The Antecedents and Performance Implications of Cooperative Exchange Norms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0213

References

  • Anderson E. Selling efficiency and choice of integrated or independent sales forces: A test of Darwinian economics. Management Sci. (1988) 34(May):599–618LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E., Weitz B. The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29:18–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S. Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization. Strategic Management Rev. (1996) 17:395–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S., Liebeskind J. P. Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(1):49–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(August):396–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Artz K. W., Brush T. H. Asset specificity, uncertainty, and relational norms: An examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2000) 41:337–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R.The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Axelrod R. An evolutionary approach to norms. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1986) 80(4):1095–1111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P.Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Boyle B., Dwyer R., Robicheaux R., Simpson J. Influence strategies in marketing channels: Measures and use in different relationship structures. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 29:462–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradach J. L., Ecccles R. G. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1989) 15:97–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. T. The informant in quantitative research. Amer. J. Sociol. (1955) 60(1):339–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannon J. P., Achrol R. S., Gundlach G. T. Contracts, norms, and plural form governance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2000) 28(2):180–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crampton S. M., Wagner J. A. Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(1):67–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) 2nd ed.(Blackwell Publishers, Inc., Malden, MA) Google Scholar
  • Doty D. H., Glick W. H. Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organ. Res. Methods (1998) 1(2):374–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dwyer F. R., Schurr P. H., Oh S. Developing buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing (1987) 51(April):11–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:271–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:660–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eggertsson T., Hechter Michael, Opp Karl-Dieter. Norms in economics—with special reference to economic development. Social Norms (2001) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketting Res. (1981) 18:39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons Robert. Taking Coase seriously. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):145–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):85–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Nickerson J. A. Interorganizational-trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. (2006) . Working paper, Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  • Gundlach G., Achrol R., Mentzer J. The structure of commitment in exchange. J. Marketing (1995) 59:78–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ham R. M., Mowery D. Improving the effectiveness of public-private R&D collaboration: Case studies at a U.S. weapons laboratory. Res. Policy (1998) 26:661–675CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R. Research, development and engineering metrics. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):1670–1689LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., John G. Do norms matter in marketing relationships? J. Marketing (1992) 56(April):32–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heiman B., Nickerson J. A. Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations. Managerial Decision Econom. (2004) 25:401–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L. Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(3):500–513CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D. “Pie-expansion” efforts: Collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):461–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D., Anderson E. Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism. Management Sci. (2003) 49(12):1684–1701LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D., Ganesan S. Control mechanisms and the relationship lifecycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):227–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeffries F., Reed R. Trust and adaptation in relational contracting. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:873–882CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C., Hesterly W. S., Borgatti S. P. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):911–945CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D.LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language (1993) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Kandori M. The use of information in repeated games with imperfect monitoring. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1992) 59:581–593CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B. Transaction cost determinants of “unfair” contractual arrangements. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1980) 70:356–362Google Scholar
  • Klein B. The economics of franchise contracts. J. Corporate Finance (1995) 2:9–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B. Why hold-ups occur: The self-enforcing range of contractual relationships. Econom. Inquiry (1996) 34:444–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B., Leffler K. The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89:615–641CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B., Crawford R., Alchian A. Vertical integration, appropriable rents and competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. (1978) 21(2):297–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leiblein M. J., Miller D. J. An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management Journal (2003) 24(9):839–859CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leiblein M. J., Reuer J. J., Dalsace F. Do make or buy decisions matter? The influence of governance on technological performance. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:817–833CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macaulay S. Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1963) 28:55–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macneil I. R. Contracts: Adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. (1978) 72(6):854–901Google Scholar
  • Macneil I. R.The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations (1980) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, and London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Macneil I. R., Campbell David. The Relational Theory of Contract: Selected Works of Ian Macneil (2001) (Sweet & Maxwell Limited, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Madhok A., Tallman S. Resources, transactions, and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):326–339LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Silverman B. S. Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(3):433–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(5):547–566LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. (2004) . ForthcomingLinkGoogle Scholar
  • Noordewier T., John G., Nevin J. Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. J. Marketing (1990) 54:80–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Oxley J. Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1997) 13(2):387–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–545CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L., Zenger T. R. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(8):707–725CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(1):90–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22:427–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver J. M. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice effect FDI survival. Management Sci. (1998) 44(4):571–585LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Silverman B. S., Nickerson J. A., Freeman J. Profitability, transactional alignment, and organizational mortality in the U.S. trucking industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:31–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H.Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (1947) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Steiger J. H. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psych. Bull. (1980) 87(2):245–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steiger J. H., Lind J. C. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factor. Annual Spring Meeting Psychometric Soc. (1980) . Iowa City, IAGoogle Scholar
  • Stump R. L., Heide J. B. Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relations. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(November):431–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):55–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tesler L. A theory of self-enforcing agreements. J. Bus. (1981) 53:27–44Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73:519–540Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(June):269–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Mechanisms of Governance (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Venkatraman N. Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:373–392CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:141–159LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zellner A. An efficient method for estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and test of aggregation bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1962) 57:500–509CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zenger T. R., Lazarini S. The strength of churning ties: A dynamic theory of interorganizational relations. (2002) . Working paper, Olin School of Business, Washington University in St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.