Competitive Implications of Interfirm Mobility

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0219

References

  • Agarwal R. E. Echambadi, Franco A. M., Sakar M. B. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development and survival. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):501–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D.Survival Analysis Using the SAS System (1995) (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) Google Scholar
  • Baldwin C. Y., Clark K.Design Rules, Vol. 1. The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron J. N., Burton M. D., Hannan M. T. The road taken: Origins and early evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5(2):239–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhide A. V. How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1994) 72(2):150–161Google Scholar
  • Bhide A. V.The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boeker W. Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product market entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boone C., Bröcheler V., Carroll G. R. Custom service: Application and tests of resource-partitioning theory among Dutch auditing firms from 1896 to 1992. Organ. Stud. (2000) 21(2):355–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boone C., Carroll G. R., van Witteloostuijn A. Environmental resource distributions and market partitioning: Dutch daily newspaper organizations from 1968 to 1994. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2002) 67:408–431CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boone C., Wezel F. C., van Witteloostuijn A., Baum J. A. C., Dobrev S., van Witteloostuijn A. Top management team composition and organizational ecology. Ecology and Strategy: Advances in Strategic Management (2006) 23(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 103–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braum E., MacDonald S.Revolution in Miniature (1978) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Burton M. D., Sorensen J. B., Beckman C. M., Lounsbury M., Ventresca M. J. Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (2002) 19(Elsevier Science, New York) 229–262Google Scholar
  • Cattani G., Pennings J. M., Wezel F. C. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in founding patterns. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):670–685LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coff R. Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(2):374–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M., Bacdayan P. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:554–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corredoira F. Social capital accessibility and innovation: Mobility ties and reverse knowledge flows in the semiconductor industry. SMS Conf. (2006) Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Edmondson A., Bohmer R., Pisano G. Disrupted routines: Group learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:685–716CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(3):504–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T., Foss N. J. Organizational routines: A sceptical look. (2005) . DRUID Working Paper 04-13Google Scholar
  • Freeman J. H., Libecap G. Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth (1986) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 33–58Google Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B., McLean A. N., Nohria N. Are leaders portable? Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84:92–101Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. H. The population ecology of organization. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82:929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. H. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49:149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris D., Helfat C. Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:895–920CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence: Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:63–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman R. S., Pisano G. P. The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2006) 52:473–488LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S. Employee startups in high-tech industries. Indust. Corporate Change (2001) 10:639–674CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S., Sleeper S. Entry by spin-offs. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1291–1306LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knott A. M. The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Sci. (2001) 47(3):430–448LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linz J. J., de Miguel A., Merritt R. L., Rokkan S. Within-nation differences and comparisons: The eight Spains. Comparing Nations: The Use of Quantitative Data in Cross-National Research (1966) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Lounsbury M., Ventresca M. J., Lounsbury M., Ventresca M. J. Social structure and organizations revisited. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (2002) 19(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 3–36Google Scholar
  • Maijoor S., van Witteloostuijn A. An empirical test of the resource-based theory: Strategic regulation in the Dutch audit industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:549–569CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maister D. H.Managing the Professional Service Firm (1993) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • McKelvey B.Organizational Systematics: Taxonomy, Evolution and Classification (1982) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Pennings J. M., Lee K., van Witteloostuijn A. Human capital, social capital and firm dissolution. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):425–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennings J., Wezel F. C.Micro-Behaviors and Organizational Evolution (2006a) (Edward Elgar, Chaltenham) Google Scholar
  • Pennings J., Wezel F. C. Demographic diversity, inter-firm mobility and competition. (2006b) . Working paper, Tilburg University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(5):793–781CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen T., Marsden P. Time aggregation bias in continuous-time hazard-rate models. Sociological Methods (1991) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 263–290Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Competitive Advantage Through People (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips J. D. A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer and Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:474–506CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putnam R. D. The strange disappearance of civic America. Amer. Prospect (1996) 7(24):34–38Google Scholar
  • Rao H., Drazin R. Overcoming resource constraints on product innovation by recruiting talent from rivals: A study of the mutual fund industry, 1986–1994. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(3):491–507CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruef M., Keister L. Origins of organizations: The entrepreneurial process. Research in the Sociology of Work (2005) (JAI Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Ruef M., Aldrich H. E., Carter N. The structure of organizational founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2003) 68:195–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49:351–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. Executive migration and interorganizational competition. Soc. Sci. Res. (1999) 28:289–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A., March J. G. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 142–193Google Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuma N., Hannan M. T.Social Dynamics: Models and Methods (1984) (Academic Press, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Wagner J. The life history of exits from German manufacturing. Small Bus. Econom. (1999) 13:71–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wezel F. C., Saka A. Antecedents and consequences of organizational change: “Institutionalizing” the behavioral theory of the firm. Organ. Stud. (2006) 27:265–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams K. Y., O’Reilly C., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior (1998) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 77–149Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G. The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(Special issue):981–996CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter S. G., Szulanski G. Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:730–743LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yamaguchi Y.Event History Analysis (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Yin R.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Zenger T. R., Lawrence B. S. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:353–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–351LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.