A Multilevel Investigation of the Motivational Mechanisms Underlying Knowledge Sharing and Performance

References

• Alavi M., Leidner D. E. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. (2001) 1:107–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:150–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36:140–154Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49:571–582Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Ingram P., Levine J. M., Moreland R. L. Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:1–8Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia P. G., Locke E. A., Smith K. G. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:837–854Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia P. G., Kristof-Brown A., Brown K., Locke E. A. The relationship of goals and microlevel work processes to performance on a multipath manual task. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81:483–497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakeman R., Gottman J. M.Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis (1997) 2nd ed.(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A.Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (1997) (W. H. Freeman & Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Bandura A., Jourden F. J. Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1991) 60:941–956Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry B., Crant J. M. Dyadic communication relationships in organizations: An attribution/expectancy approach. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:648–664Link, Google Scholar
• Bartol K. M., Durham C. C., Cooper C. L., Locke E. A. Incentives: Theory and practice. Theory and Practice in Industrial-Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (2000) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 1–33Google Scholar
• Bartol K. M., Srivastava A. Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. J. Leadership & Organ. Stud. (2002) 9:64–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44:996–1016Link, Google Scholar
• Bettenhausen K. L., Murningham J. K. The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:350–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 349–381Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Drasgow F., Schmitt N. Multilevel random coefficient modeling in organizational research: Examples using SAS and S-PLUS. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis (2002) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Hanges P. J. Non-independence in random coefficient models: It is not only about too much Type I error. 61st Acad. Management Meetings (2001) (Washington, D.C.)Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Ployhart R. Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organ. Res. Methods (2002) 5:362–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bobko P. A solution to some dilemmas when testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions. J. Appl. Psych. (1986) 71:323–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bock G. W., Kim Y. Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Inform. Res. Management J. (2002) 15:14–21Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49:432–446Link, Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:40–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizing knowledge. California Management Rev. (1998) 40:90–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:198–213Link, Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Local knowledge: Innovation in the networked age. Management Learn. (2002) 33:427–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesney A. A., Locke E. A. Relationships among goal difficulty, business strategies, and performance on a complex management simulation task. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:400–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole R. E. Introduction. California Management Rev (1998) 45(3):15–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings L. L., Bromiley P., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. The organization trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H., Prusak L.Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Dawes R. M. Social dilemmas. Annual Rev. Psych (1980) 31:169–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M. An experimental study of the effects of competition and cooperation upon group process. Human Relations (1949) 2:129–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M., Gumpert P., Epstein Y. The effect of incentive magnitude on cooperation the prisoner’s dilemma game. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1969) 11:66–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M., Epstein Y., Canavan D., Gumpert P. Strategies of inducing cooperation: An experimental study. J. Conflict Resolution (1967) 11:345–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks K. T. The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84:445–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks K. T., Ferrin D. L. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:450–467Link, Google Scholar
• Durham C. C., Knight D., Locke E. A. Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1997) 72:203–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley P. C., Perry B. C. Work plan availability and performance: An assessment of task strategy priming on subsequent task completion. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1987) 39:279–302Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1554–1568Link, Google Scholar
• Ferrin D. L., Dirks K. T. The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:18–31Link, Google Scholar
• Geen R. G. Social motivation. Ann. Rev. Psych. (1991) 42:377–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gist M. E., Mitchell T. R. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad. Mgmt. Rev. (1992) 17:183–202Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Darr E. D. Exchanging best practices through computer-aided systems. Acad. Management Executive (1996) 10:7–19Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Darr E. D. Computer-aided systems and communities: Mechanisms for organizational learning in distributed environments. MIS Quart. (1998) 22:417–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge management’s social dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel. Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 42(1):71–80Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Lorsch J. W. The design of effective work teams. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Group influences on individuals in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1992) 2nd ed.(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 199–267Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Mors M. L., Lovas B. Knowledge sharing in organizations: A relational perspective. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:776–795Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes R. H., Clark K. B. Explaining observed productivity differentials between plants: Implications for operations research. Interfaces (1985) 15:3–14Link, Google Scholar
• Hofmann D. A. An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. J. Management (1997) 23:723–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holtshouse D. Knowledge research issues. California Management Rev. (1998) 40:277–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hornstein H., Deutsch M. The tendency to compete and attack as a function of inspection, incentive, and available alternatives. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1967) 5:311–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Knoll K., Leidner D. E. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14:29–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Shaw T. R., Staples D. S. Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15:250–267Link, Google Scholar
• Jassawalla A. R., Sashittal H. C. Building collaborative cross-functional teams. Acad. Management Executive (1999) 12:50–63Google Scholar
• Joreskog K. G., Sorbom D.LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide (1996) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Kalman M. E., Monge P., Fulk J., Heino R. Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Comm. Res. (2002) 29:125–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandel E., Lazear E. P. Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100:801–817Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz R., Allen T. J. Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A new look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management (1982) 12(1):88–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L., Shapiro D. L. Understanding why team members won’t share: An examination of factors related to employee receptivity to team-based rewards. Small Group Res. (2000) 31:175–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. What do firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:502–518Link, Google Scholar
• Kostova T. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24:308–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S. W. J., Klein K. J., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 3–90Google Scholar
• Landy F., Becker W. S. Motivation theory reconsidered. Res. Organ. Behav. (1987) 9:1–38Google Scholar
• Latham G. P., Baldes J. J. The “practical significance” of Locke’s theory of goal-setting. J. Appl. Psych. (1975) 60:122–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler E. E.Pay and Organizational Development (1981) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Lee C., Bobko P. Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79:364–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin D. Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50:1477–1490Link, Google Scholar
• Locke E. A.Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings (1986) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
• Locke E. A., Latham G. P.A Theory of Goal-Setting and Task Performance (1990) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Locke E. A., Latham G. P. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. Amer. Psych. (2002) 57:705–715Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke E. A., Frederick E., Lee C., Bobko P. The effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:241–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Malhotra A., John R. Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology-enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16:9–27Link, Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman D. F. An integration model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20:709–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAllister D. J. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:24–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B., Perrone V., Zaheer A. Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:91–103Link, Google Scholar
• Menon T., Pfeffer J. Valuing internal vs. external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Sci. (2003) 49:497–514Link, Google Scholar
• Mento A. J., Locke E. A., Klein H. J. Relationship of goal level to valence and instrumentality. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77:395–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Messick D. M., Brewer M. B., Wheeler L., Shaver P. Solving social dilemmas: A review. Review of Personality and Social Psychology (1983) 4(Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) 11–44Google Scholar
• Miner J. B. The rated important, scientific validity, and practical usefulness of organizational behavior theories: A quantitative review. Acad. Management Learning Education (2003) 2:250–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell T. R. Matching motivational strategies with organizational contexts. Res. Organ. Behav. (1997) 19:57–149Google Scholar
• Mohammed S., Dumville B. C. Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. J. Organ. Behav. (2001) 22:89–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Levine J. M., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Socialization in organizations and work groups. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2001) 2nd ed.(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 199–267Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Myaskovsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:117–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulvey P. W., Klein H. J. Impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1998) 74:62–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge Creating Company (1995) (Oxford, New York) Google Scholar
• O’Dell C., Grayson C. J. If we only knew what we know: Identification and transfer of internal best practices. California Management Rev. (1998) 40:154–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T. Grammatical models of organizational processes. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:541–556Link, Google Scholar
• Pinder C. C.Work Motivation: Theory, Issues, and Applications (1984) (Scott, Glenville, IL) Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J. C., Bates D. M.Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS (2000) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prussia G. E., Kinicki A. J. A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81:187–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rau D. The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory: Performance relationships in top management teams. Small Group Res. (2005) 36:746–771Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2002) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Robinson S. Trust and the breach of the psychological contract. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:574–599Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger F. J., Dickson W. J.Management and the Worker (1939) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Rutte C. G., Wilke H. A. M., Leibrand W., Messick D., Wilke H. A. M. Goals, expectations, and behavior in a social dilemma situation. Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings (1992) (Pergamon, New York) 280–305Google Scholar
• Spender J. C., Grant R. M. Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:5–9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivas T. A benchmarking method for business-process reengineering and improvement. Internat. J. Flexible Manufacturing Systems (2000) 12:291–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G., Titus W. Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psych. Inquiry (2003) 14:304–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M. Attribution of the “causes” of performance—A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1975) 13:414–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens L. Incentives for sharing. Knowledge Management (2000) Oct.):54–60Google Scholar
• Strube M. J., Bobko P. Testing hypothesis about ordinal interactions: Simulations and further comments. J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74:247–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:9–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G., Cappetta R., Jensen R. J. When and how trustworthiness matters: Knowledge transfer and moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:600–613Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson K. R., Hochwarter W. A., Mathys N. J. Stretch targets: What makes them effective? Acad. Management Executive (1997) 11:48–60Google Scholar
• Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:996–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Ferry D. L.Measuring and Assessing Organizations (1978) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Van Lange P. A., Liebrand W., Messick D., Wilke H., Liebrand W. B. G., Messick D. M., Wilke H. Introduction and literature review. Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings (1992) (Pergamon, New York) 3–28Google Scholar
• Wageman R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:145–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R., Turner M. E. The meaning of interdependence. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 197–218Google Scholar
• Wageman R., Baker G. P. Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. J. Organ. Behav. (1997) 18:139–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weldon E., Weingart L. R. Group goals and group performance. British J. Soc. Psych. (1993) 32:307–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:141–160Link, Google Scholar
• Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:76–92Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G. Institutional theories of organization. Ann. Rev. Soc. (1987) 13:443–464Crossref, Google Scholar