A Triple Take on Information System Implementation

References

• Adams D. E., Nelson R. R., Todd P. A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and information usage. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):227–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R., Karahanna E. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive Absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):665–694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken M., Hage J. The organic organization and innovation. Sociology (1971) 5:63–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I., Fishbein M.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Behaviors (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Allison G. T.Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (1971) (Little Brown, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Allison G. T., Zelikow P.Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (1999) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley Longman, New York) Google Scholar
• Ash J. S., Bates D. W. Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J. Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc. (2005) 12(1):8–12Google Scholar
• Auerbach Carl F., Silverstein L. B.Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis (2003) (New York University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Baldrige J. V., Burnham R. Organizational innovation: Industrial, organizational and environmental impact. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20:165–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A., Pinsonneault A. Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):493–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Barki H. Quo vadis TAM. J. Assoc. SystemsForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Compeau D., Higgins C. A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):189–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crabtree B. F., Miller W. L.Doing Qualitative Research, Research Methods for Primary Care (1992) 3(Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Creswell J. W.Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2003) 2nd ed.(Sage, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Becker S. W.The Innovative Organization (1978) (Elsevier, New York) Google Scholar
• Damanpour F. The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. J. Management (1987) 13(4):675–688Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(3):555–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour F. Organizational size and innovations. Organ. Study (1992) 13(3):375–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour F., Gopalakrishnan S. Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: The role of environmental change. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1998) 15(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warsaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003Link, Google Scholar
• Doty H. D., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1196–1250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downey-Ennis K., Harrington D. In search of excellence in Irish health care. Internat. J. Health Care Quality Assurance (2002) 15(2):65–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gattinker T. F., Goodhue D. L. What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):559–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan S., Damanpour F. A review of innovation research in economics, sociology, and technology management. Omega (1997) 25(1):15–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guba E. G., Lincoln Y. S.Fourth Generation Evaluation (1989) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R. Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. J. Organ. Behav. (2003) 24:905–922Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Cragg P., Cavaye A. L. M. Personal computing acceptance in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(3):279–302Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasperson J., Carter P. E., Zmud R. W. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):525–558Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil M. Escalation of commitment in information systems development: A comparison of three theories. Acad. Management J. (1995) 348–352Google Scholar
• Kimberly J. R., Evanisko M. J. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad. Management J. (1981) 24(4):689–713Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(4):691–710Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lapointe L., Rivard S. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly (2005) 29(3):461–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee A. S., Myers M., Paré G., Urquhart C., Markus M. L., Orlikowski W. J., Weill P., Ang S., Krcmar H. C. Three perspectives: If Markus’ 1983 classic study, “Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation,” were being reviewed today. Proc. 21st ICIS (2000) Brisbane, Australia:724–726Google Scholar
• Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G.Naturalistic Inquiry (1985) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Rice R. E., Malhotra A., King N., Ba S. Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):569–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Comm. ACM (1983) 26(6):430–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Tanis C., Zmud R. W. The enterprise system experience—From adoption to success. Framing the Domains of IT Research (2000) (Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, OH) 173–207Google Scholar
• Mason R. O., Mitroff I. I. A program for research on management information systems. Management Sci. (1973) 19(5):475–487Link, Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman M. A.Qualitative Data Analysis (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Sci. (1980) 26(3):322–341Link, Google Scholar
• Moch M. K. Structure and organizational resource allocation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21:661–674Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton M. Q.Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (2002) 3rd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Pierce J. L., Delbecq A. L. Organizational structure, individual attitude, and innovation. Acad. Management Rev. (1977) 2:26–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross P. F. Innovation adoption by organizations. Personnel Psych. (1974) 27:21–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Kirsch L. J. An integrative framework of the information system development process. Decision Sci. (2000) 31(2):391–411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitz J., Fulk J. Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail. Comm. Res. (1991) 18(4):487–523Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W. R., Ruef M., Mendel P. J., Caronna C. A.Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Swanson E. B., Ramiller N. C. Innovating mindfully with IT. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):553–583Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson V. A. Bureaucracy and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1965) 10:1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wixom B. H., Todd P. A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):85–102Link, Google Scholar
• Yin R. K.Case Study Research, Design and Methods (2003) 3rd ed.(Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Zaltman G., Duncan R., Holbek J.Innovations and Organizations (1973) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar