Leveraging Knowledge Across Geographic Boundaries

References

• Adams J. Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. J. Econom. Geography (2002) 2(3):253–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams J., Jaffe A. Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched firm and establishment data. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27:700–721Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A. Innovation, growth theory and the role of knowledge spillovers. Innovation Anal. Bull. (2002) 4(3):3–6Google Scholar
• Alcacer J., Gittelman M. How do I know what you know? The role of inventors and examiners in the generation of patent citations. (2004) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917Link, Google Scholar
• Anselin L., Acs Z., Vargas A. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J. Urban Econom. (1997) 42:422–448Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachmann A. Profiles of corporate technological capabilities: A comparison of large British and German pharmaceutical firms. Technovation (1998) 18(10):593–604Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartholomew S. National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1997) 28(2):241–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bramstetter L. Measuring the link between academic science and innovation: The case of California research universities. (2002) . Mimeo, University of California, Davis, CAGoogle Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R., March J.The Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Ellison G., Glaeser E. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. J. Political Econom. (1997) 105(5):889–928Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. The Internet revolution and the geography of innovation. Internat. Soc. Sci. J. (2002) 54:47–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M., Audretsch D. Innovation in cities: Science based diversity, specialization and localized competition. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1999) 43(2):409–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser E., Kallal H., Scheinkman J., Shleifer A. Growth in cities. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(6):1126–1152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granstrand O., Patel P., Pavitt K. Multi-technology corporations: Why they have distributed rather than core competencies? California Management Rev. (1997) 39(4):8–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within the multinational corporation. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(4):473–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamel G. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(4):83–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. Real effects of academic research. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(5):957–970Google Scholar
• Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., Fogarty M., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. The meaning of patent citations: Report of the NBER/Case Western survey of patentees. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (2002) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 374–401Google Scholar
• Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(3):577–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B. Country capabilities and the permeability of borders. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(4):33–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krmenec A., Esparza A. City systems and industrial market structure. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers (1999) 89(2):267–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane P., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(5):461–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markusen A., Barnes T., Gertler M. Sticky places in slippery space. The New Industrial Geography (1999) (Routledge, London, UK) 98–126Google Scholar
• Narin F., Noma E., Perry R. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Res. Policy (1987) 16(2–4):143–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phene A., Fladmoe-Lindquist K., Marsh L. Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(4):369–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) Nov–Dec):77–90Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Econom. Development Quart. (2000) 14(1):15–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Praest M. Changing technological capabilities in high tech firms: A study of the telecommunication industry. J. High Tech. Management Res. (1998) 9(2):175–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romanelli E., Khessina O. Regional industrial identity: Cluster configurations and economic development. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):344–358Link, Google Scholar
• Saxenian Anna Lee. Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Rev. (1990) 33(1):39–112Google Scholar
• Shan W., Song J. Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technological advantage: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1997) 28(2):267–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Storper M. The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. J. Eur. Urban Regional Stud. (1995) 2:191–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallman S., Jenkins M., Henry N., Pinch S. Knowledge clusters and competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29(2):258–271Google Scholar