Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters

References

• Adler P. S. Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:215–234Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson A. I., Compton D., Mason T. Managing in a dangerous world: The National Incident Management System. Engrg. Management J. (2004) 16(4):3–9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
• Argote L., McGrath J. Group processes in organizations: Continuity and change. Internat. Rev. Indust. Organ. Psych. (1993) 8:333–389Google Scholar
• Argote L., Ingram P., Levine J. M., Moreland R. L. Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:1–8Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky B. A. Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):3–21Link, Google Scholar
• Bigley G. A., Roberts K. The incident command system: High reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1281–1300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackler F. Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organ. Stud. (1995) 16:1021–1046Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blickensderfer E., Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E., Beyerlein M. M., Johnson D. A., Beyerlein S. T. Theoretical bases for team self-correction: Fostering shared mental models. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Implementation Issues (1997) 4(JAI Press, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Boland R. J., Tenkasi R. V. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:350–372Link, Google Scholar
• Brandon D. P., Hollingshead A. B. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:633–644Link, Google Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K.Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1998) (Harvard School Publishing, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Child J., Mollering G. Contextual confidence and active trust development in the Chinese business development. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):69–80Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke L. B.Acceptable Risk? Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment (1989) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Cook S. D., Brown J. S. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:381–400Link, Google Scholar
• Coppola N. Building trust in virtual teams. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. (2004) 47(2):95–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Department of Homeland Security (DHS) National Incident Management System. (2004) (Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.) . http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/NIMS-90-web.pdfGoogle Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Monge P. Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:693–703Link, Google Scholar
• Drabek T. E.Human System Responses to Disasters: An Inventory of Social Findings (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drabek T. E., McEntire D. A. Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: Lessons, trends and opportunities from the research literature. Disaster Prevention and Management (2003) 12(2):97–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drabek T. E., Taminga J. L., Kilijanek T. S., Adams C. R.Managing Multiorganizational Emergency Responses: Emergent Search and Rescue Networks in Natural Disasters and Remote Area Settings (1981) . Bounder Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
• Dyer L., Shafer R., Peterson R. S., Mannix E. A. Dynamic organizations. Managing People in Dynamic Organizations (2003) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 7–40Google Scholar
• Dynes R. Problems in emergency planning. Energy (1983) 8:633–660Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dynes R., Tierney K.Disasters, Collective Behavior, and Social Organization (1994) (University of Delaware Press, Newark, DE) Google Scholar
• Ellis A. P. J. System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:576–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1554–1568Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Xiao Y. Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1155–1189Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:94–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foreman T., Ahlers M. M., Cooper A. People making decisions hesitated. (2005) . http://www.cnn.comGoogle Scholar
• GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office) Hurricane Katrina: Providing oversight of the nation’s preparedness, response, and recovery activities. (2005) . GAO-05-1053T (Sept. 28)Google Scholar
• Haas M. R. Knowledge gathering, team capabilities, and project performance in challenging work environments. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1170–1184Link, Google Scholar
• Hagel J., Brown J. S.The Only Sustainable Edge (2005) (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Hale J. E., Dulek R. E., Hale D. P. Crisis response communication challenges. J. Bus. Comm. (2005) 42:112–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison R. T., Dibben M. R., Mason C. M. The role of trust in the informal investor’s investment decision: An exploratory analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (1997) Summer):63–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1998a) 34:423–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998b) 74:659–671Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Perceptions of expertise in and transactive memory in work relationships. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations (2000) 3:257–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81:1080–1089Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Majchrzak A. Developing individuals’ transactive memories of their ego-centric networks to mitigate risks of knowledge sharing: The case of professionals protecting cybersecurity. 26th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems Proc. (2005) Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Knoll K., Leidner D. Is anybody out there? The antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(4):29–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999) 50:569–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps G. Sociological inquiry and disaster research. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1984) 10:309–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langfred C. W. Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(3):385–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuf B., Cunningham W.The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web (2001) (Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Levine J. M., Moreland R. L., Thompson L. L., Levine J. M., Messnick D. M. Knowledge transmission in work groups: Helping newcomers to succeed. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (1999) (Lawrence Erlbaum, London, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewicki R. J., Bunker B. B., Bunker B. B., Rubin J. Z. Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice (1995) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:587–604Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K., Lange D., Gillis L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:581–598Link, Google Scholar
• Liang D., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21:384–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Cooper L., Neece O. Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Sci. (2004) 50:174–188Link, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Malhotra A., Lipnack J., Stamps J. J. Can absence make a team grow stronger? Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82:131–137Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20:709–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:473–490Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon T., Thompson L., Cho H.-S. Tainted knowledge vs. tempting knowledge: People avoid knowledge from internal rivals and seek knowledge from external rivals. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1129–1144Link, Google Scholar
• Meyerson D., Weick K. E., Kramer R. M. Swift trust and temporary groups. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Study and Research (1996) (Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohammed S., Dumville B. C. Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. J. Organ. Behav. (2001) 22:89–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Argote L., Peterson R. S., Mannix E. A. Transactive memory in dynamic organizations. Leading and Managing People in the Dynamic Organization (2003) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Myaskowsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:117–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moynihan D. P. Leveraging collaborative networks in infrequent emergency situations. (2005) . Collaboration series: Research report. IBM Center for the Business of Government (June)Google Scholar
• Nagle K. J. Katrina’s federal heroes. Traffic World (2005) Sept. 19Google Scholar
• Neal D., Phillips B. Effective emergency management: Reconsidering the bureaucratic approach. Disasters (1995) 19:327–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Government prepares for next big disasterNew York Times (2005) Dec. 31Google Scholar
• Red Cross sifting internal charges over Katrina aidNew York Times (2006) March 24Google Scholar
• Peterson R. S., Mannix E. A.Leading and Managing People in the Dynamic Organization (2003) (Erlbaum, NJ) Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Hollingshead A. B.Theories of Small Groups: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2005) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Quarantelli E. L.What Is a Disaster? (1998) (Routledge, New York) Google Scholar
• Quinn J. B., Anderson P., Finkelstein S. Making the most of the best. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(2):71–80Google Scholar
• Tierney K. J., Trainor J. E.Networks and Resilience in the World Trade Center Disaster (2004) (Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY) Google Scholar
• Tierney K. J., Lindell M. K., Perry R. W.Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States (2001) (Joseph Henry Press)Google Scholar
• Four places where the system broke downTime (2005) 166(Sept. 19):34–41Google Scholar
• Trainor J. E. Searching for a System: Multi-Organizational Coordination in the September 11th World Trade Center Search and Rescue Response. (2004) . Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice and Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DEGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Congress House Ways and Means Committee, Subcommittee on Oversight. Hearing to Review the Response by Charities to Hurricane Katrina (2005) Dec. 13Google Scholar
• Vera D., Crossan M. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:203–224Link, Google Scholar
• Wachtendorf T. Improvising 9/11: Organizational Improvisation Following the World Trade Center Disaster. (2004) . Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice and Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DEGoogle Scholar
• Wachtendorf T., Kendra J. M. Improvising disaster in the city of jazz: Organizational response to Hurricane Katrina. (2005) . http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Wachtendorf_Kendra/Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Mullen B., Goethals G. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1987) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M. A computer network model of human transactive memory. Soc. Cognition (1995) 13:319–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Introductory essay: Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:543–555Link, Google Scholar