Organizations Non Gratae? The Impact of Unethical Corporate Acts on Interorganizational Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0229

References

  • Aldrich H., Auster E. R., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior (1986) 8(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 165–198Google Scholar
  • Baker W., Faulkner R. The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1993) 58:837–860CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baucus M. S., Baucus D. A. Paying the piper: An empirical examination of longer-term financial consequences of illegal corporate behavior. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:129–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baucus M. S., Near J. P. Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:9–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J., Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:187–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J., Oliver C. Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1992) 57:540–559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C., Haunschild P. R. Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart (2002) 47:92–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C., Haunschild P. R., Phillips D. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:259–276LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamin B. A., Podolny J. Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:563–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bilimoria D., Piderit S. K. Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:1453–1477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boeker W., Goodstein J. Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 34:805–826CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonacich P. Factoring and weighing approaches to clique identification. J. Math. Sociol. (1972) 2:113–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.UCInet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brass D. J., Butterfield K. D., Skaggs B. C. Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:14–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broschak J. Managers’ mobility and market interface: The effect of managers’ career mobility on the dissolution of market ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:608–640Google Scholar
  • Burt R.Corporate Profiles and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy (1983) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Burt R.Structural Holes (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. The network structure of social capital. Res. Organ. Behav. (2000) 22:345–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • SBC Communications Inc. ranked America’s most admired telecommunications CompanyBusiness Wire (2000) Feb. 8Google Scholar
  • Davis G. F. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:583–613CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G. F., Yoo M., Baker W. E. The network topography of the corporate elite 1982–2001. Strategic Organ. (2003) 1:301–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse D. L. Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource–based theories. J. Management (2000) 26(6):1091–1112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Egbert D. Durham, N.C.-based broker still believes in bandwidth trading. News & Observer (2002) January 23Google Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:57–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., Sutton R. I. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:699–738CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fombrun C.Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (1996) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fombrun C., Shanley M. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33:233–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fombrun C., Gardberg N., Sever J. The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. J. Brand Management (2000) 7:241–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford R. C., Richardson W. D. Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. J. Bus. Ethics (1994) 13:205–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedkin N. E. Social cohesion. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1998) 30:409–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galaskiewicz J. Interorganizational relations. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1985) 11:281–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:293–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do international networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105:107–231Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. H. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82:929–965CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:80–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrigan K. R. Numbers and positions of women elected to corporate boards. Acad. Management J. (1981) 24:619–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:564–592CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R. How much is that company worth?: Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty, and acquisition premiums. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:391–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber P. J. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proc. 5th Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. (1967) 1(University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Human S. E., Provan K. G. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:327–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacquemin A., Nambu T., Dewez I. A dynamic analysis of export cartels: The Japanese case. Econom. J. (1981) 91:685–696Google Scholar
  • Jones T. M. Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 20:404–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koenig T., Gogel R., Sonquist J. Models of the significance of interlocking corporate directorates. Amer. J. Econom. Sociol. (1979) 38:173–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kyradzidou E. Estimation of a panel data sample selection model. Econometrica (1997) 65:1335–1364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lang J., Lockhardt D. Increased environmental uncertainty and changes in board linkage patterns. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33:106–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang S. L., Zeger K.-Y. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika (1986) 73:13–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B., Zaheer A. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:1133–1156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meindl J. R., Ehrlich S. B., Dukerich J. M. The romance of leadership. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:78–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83:340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Amburgey T. L., Stearns T. Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:689–713CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizruchi M. S., Stearns L. A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 39:194–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nijman T., Verbeek M. Nonresponse in panel data: The impact on estimates of a life-cycle consumption function. J. Appl. Econometrics (1992) 7:243–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nohria N., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? Networks and Organizations (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. (2003) 24:403–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D. Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:40–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D., Zhou X., Barber B., Soysal Y. The friendly and predatory acquisition of large U.S. corporations in the 1960s: The other contested terrain. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1995) 60:469–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper & Row Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J., Phillips D. The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5:453–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J., Stuart T., Hannan M. Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (1996) 102:659–689CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollock T. G., Rindova V. P. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(5):631–642CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:29–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:240–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reichert A. K., Lockett M., Rao R. The impact of illegal business practice on shareholder returns. The Financial Rev. (1996) 31:67–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson R. J. Directorship interlocks and corporate profitability. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1987) 32:367–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts P. W., Dowling G. R. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:1077–1093CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (2001) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Shapiro S. Thinking about white-collar crime: Matters of conceptualization and research. Research on White Collar Crime (1980) (National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Sine W. D., Shane S., Di Gregorio D. The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. (2003) 49:478–492LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Epstein L. D. What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation and CEO pay. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:523–556CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Szwajkowski E. The scarcity-munificence of organizational environments and the commission of illegal acts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20:345–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart D. G. Social status in an open-source community. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2005) 70(5):823–842CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stokman F. N., Van der Knoop J., Wasseur F. Interlocks in the Netherlands: Stability and careers in the period 1960–1980. Soc. Networks (1988) 10:183–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:315–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suchman M. C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev (1995) 20:571–610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trevino L. K., Brown M. E. Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Acad. Management Executive (2004) 18:69–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Useem M.The Inner Circle (1984) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61:674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wall J. K. The Indianapolis Star downtown digest column. The Indianapolis Star (2003) February 24Google Scholar
  • Washington M., Zajac E. Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. (2004) 48:282–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal J. D. Board games: How CEOs adapt to increases in structural board independence from management. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:511–537CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica (1982) 50:1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiewel W., Hunter A. The interorganizational network as a resource: A comparative case study on organizational genesis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:482–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:269–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou X. Occupational prestige ranking. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 111:90–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L. G. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1977) 42:726–743CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.