Fairness from the Top: Perceived Procedural Justice and Collaborative Problem Solving in New Product Development

References

• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1981) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aram J. D., Morgan C. P., Esbeck E. S. Relation of collaborative interpersonal relationships to individual satisfaction and organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 16:289–297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:420–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong S. J., Overton T. S. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14:396–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K., Li H. Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:583–597Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autio E., Sapienza H. J., Almeida J. G. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:909–924Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avolio B. J., Yammarino F. J., Bass B. M. Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue. J. Management (1991) 17:571–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P., Phillips L. W. Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:459–489Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51:1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boomsma A. On the robustness of LISREL (maximum likelihood estimation) against small sample size and nonnormality. (1983) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Booz, Allen, and HamiltonNew Products Management for the 1980s (1982) (Booz, Allen, and Hamilton, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Brockner J., Wiesenfeld B. M. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psych. Bull. (1996) 120:189–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J., Tyler T. R., Cooper-Schneider R. The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness: The higher they are, the harder they fall. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:241–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20:343–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Cohen-Charash Y., Spector P. E. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 86:278–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt J. A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86:386–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt J. A., Conlon D. E., Wesson M. J., Porter C. O. L. H., Ng K. Y. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86:425–445Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowherd D. M., Levine D. I. Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:302–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dailey R. C. The role of team and task characteristics in R&D team collaborative problem solving and productivity. Management Sci. (1978) 24:1579–1587Link, Google Scholar
• DiStefano J. J., Maznevski M. L. Creating value with diverse teams in global management. Organ. Dynam. (2000) 29:45–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:77–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:350–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R., Fasolo P., Davis-LaMastro V. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75:51–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folger R. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement of experienced inequity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1977) 35:108–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J. Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79:288–297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Geletkanycz M. A., Fredrickson J. W. Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:401–418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hare A. P. Group size. Amer. Behavioral Scientist (1981) 24:695–708Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:716–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jassawalla A. R., Sashittal H. C. An examination of collaboration in high-technology new product development processes. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15:237–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn K. B. Interdepartmental integration—A definition with implications for product development performance. J. Product Innovation Management (1996) 13:137–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim W. C., Mauborgne R. A. Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals’ corporate strategic decisions. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:502–526Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim W. C., Mauborgne R. A. A procedural justice model of strategic decision making: Strategy content implications in the multinational. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:44–61Link, Google Scholar
• Kim W. C., Mauborgne R. A. Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:323–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korsgaard M. A., Schweiger D. M., Sapienza H. J. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:60–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leventhal G. S., Gergen K., Greenberg M., Willis R. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (1980) (Plenium, New York) 27–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liedtka J. M. Collaborating across lines of business for competitive advantage. Acad. Management Executive (1996) 10:20–37Google Scholar
• Lind E. A., Tyler T. R.The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (1988) (Plenum Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind E. A., van den Bos K. , Staw B. M., Kramer R. M. When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior (2002) (Elsevier, Boston, MA) 181–223Google Scholar
• Lind E. A., Greenberg J., Scott K. S., Welchans T. D. The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:557–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long C. Justice and outcomes. (2002) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
• MacCormack A. Product development practices that work: How Internet companies build software. Sloan Management Rev. (2001) 42(2):75–81Google Scholar
• Masterson S. S., Lewis K., Goldman B. M., Taylor M. S. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:738–748Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Schoorman F. D. Predicting participation and production outcomes through a two-dimensional model of organizational commitment. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:671–684Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonough E., Barczak G. The effects of cognitive problem-solving orientation and technological familiarity on faster new product development. J. Product Innovation Management (1992) 9:44–52Google Scholar
• McDougall P. P., Covin J. G., Robinson R. B., Herron L. The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategy content. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:537–554Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGee J. E., Dowling M. J., Megginson W. L. Cooperative strategy and new venture performance: The role of business strategy and management experience. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:565–580Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. Relating Porter’s business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Acad. Management. J. (1988) 32:280–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss M. M., Calantone R. Determinants of new product performance—A review and meta-analysis. J. Product Innovation Management (1994) 11:397–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C., Miner A. S. The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34:91–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowday R. T., Steers R. M., Porter L. W. The measurement of organizational commitment. J. Vocational Behav. (1979) 14:224–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naumann S. E., Bennett N. A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:881–889Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• O’Reilly C., Chatman J. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. J. Appl. Psych. (1986) 71:492–499Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinto M. B., Pinto J. K., Prescott J. E. Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Sci. (1993) 39:1281–1297Link, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12:531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S .B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott S. G., Bruce R. A. Determinants of innovative behavior—A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:580–607Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethi R. Superordinate identity in cross-functional product development teams: Its antecedents and effect on new product performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2000) 28:330–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheremata W. A. Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:389–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T. L., Peterson R. S. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85:102–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T., Pelled L. H., Smith K. A. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:662–673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith K. G., Collins C. J., Clark K. D. Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:346–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song X. M., Montoya-Weiss M. M., Schmidt J. B. Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives. J. Product Innovation Management (1997) 14:35–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spector P. E. Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? J. Appl. Psych. (1987) 72:438–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart G. L., Barrick M. R. Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:135–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton R. I., Hargadon A. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:685–718Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swink M. Technological innovativeness as a moderator of new product design integration and top management support. J. Product Innovation Management (2000) 17:208–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tepper B. H., Lockhart D., Hoobler J. Justice, citizenship, and role definition effects. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86:789–796Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tepper B. J., Taylor E. C. Relationships among supervisors’ and subordinates’ procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:97–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thibaut J. W., Walker L.Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (1975) (Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Thomke S. H. Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Sci. (1998) 44:743–762Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S., Fujimoto T. The effect of “front-loading” problem-solving on product development performance. J. Product Innovation Management (2000) 17:128–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R. The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (1997) 1:323–345Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Lind E. A., Zanna M. P. A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Psychology (1992) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 115–191Google Scholar
• Van den Bos K. Reactions to perceived fairness: The impact of mortality salience and self-esteem on ratings of negative affect. Soc. Justice Res. (2001) 14:1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal J. D. Board games—How CEOs adapt to increases in structural board independence from management. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:511–537Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zirger B. J., Maidique M. A. A model of new product development: An empirical test. Management Sci. (1990) 36:867–883Link, Google Scholar