Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms

References

• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Aldrich H. E.Organizations and Environments (1979) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Aldrich H. E.Organizations Evolving (1999) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Amit R., Zott C. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:493–520Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhide A.The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger A. M., Nalebuff B. J. The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73:57–71Google Scholar
• Brandenburger A. M., Stuart H. Value-based business strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1996) 5:5–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T., Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117:339–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L., Dutton W., Kahin B., O’Callaghan R., Wyckoff A. Intangible assets and the economic impact of computers. Transforming Enterprise (2004) (MIT Press, Boston, MA) 27–48Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H., Rosenbloom R. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spinoff companies. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11:529–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M. The past and future of competitive advantage. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2001) 42:105–109Google Scholar
• Clemons E. K., Row M. C. Information technology and industrial cooperation: The changing economics of coordination and ownership. J. Management Inform. Systems (1992) 9:9–28Google Scholar
• Coff R. L. When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:119–133Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Cohen P.Applied Multiple Regression: Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lewin A. Y. Where are the theories for the “new” organizational forms? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:i–viGoogle Scholar
• Davidow W. H., Malone M. S.The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century (1992) (HarperBusiness, New York) Google Scholar
• Deephouse D. L. To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:147–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Beard D. W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:52–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Robinson R. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5:265–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowling M. J., McGee J. E. Business and technology strategies and new venture performance: A study of the telecommunications equipment industry. Management Sci. (1994) 40:1663–1677Link, Google Scholar
• Drucker P.Innovation and Entrepreneurship (1985) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Dunbar R. L. M., Starbuck W. H. Learning to design organizations, and designing to learn from them. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:171–178Link, Google Scholar
• Filson D. The impact of e-commerce strategies on firm value: Lessons from Amazon.com and its early competitors. J. Bus. (2004) 77:135–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and management error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18:39–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss N. J. Introduction: New organizational forms—Critical perspectives. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. (2002) 9:1–8Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatignon H.Statistical Analysis of Management Data (2003) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Gatignon H., Tushman M., Smith W., Anderson P. A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type and characteristics. Management Sci. (2002) 48:1103–1122Link, Google Scholar
• Greene W.Econometric Analysis (2003) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hargadorn A. B., Douglas Y. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:476–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawawini G., Subramanian V., Verdin P. Is performance driven by industry- or firm-specific factors? A new look at the evidence. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hite J. M., Hesterly W. S. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:275–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt M. A., Ireland R. D., Camp S. M., Sexton D. L. Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:479–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:195–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., Clark K. B. Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3:557–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C., Kochan T. A., Levine D., Olson C., Strauss G. What works at work: Overview and assessment. Indust. Relations (1996) 35:299–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilinitch A. Y., D’Aveni R. A., Lewin A. Y. New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:211–220Link, Google Scholar
• Ireland R. D., Hitt M. A., Camp M., Sexton D. L. Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Acad. Management Executive (2001) 15:49–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum D. G., Kupper L. L., Muller K. E., Nizam A.Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods (1998) 3rd ed.(Duxberry Press, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
• Kotha S., Rajgopal S., Venkatchalam M. The role of online buying experience as a competitive advantage: Evidence from third party ratings from e-commerce firms. J. Bus. (2004) 77:109–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N. Transaction costs in real time. Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1:99–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N. The entrepreneurial theory of the firm and the theory of the entrepreneurial firm. (2005) . Working paper, Department of Economics, 2005-27, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CTGoogle Scholar
• Langlois R. N., Robertson P. R.Firms, Markets, and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions (1995) (Routledge, London, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H., Smith K. G., Grimm C. G. The effect of new product radicality and scope on the extent and speed of innovation diffusion. J. Management (2003) 29:753–768Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Volbverda H. Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:519–534Link, Google Scholar
• Lieberman M. Did first-mover advantage survive the dot-com crash? (2005) . Working paper, UCLA, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
• Lounsbury M., Glynn M. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:545–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A., Verganti R., Iansiti M. Developing products on “Internet time:” The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Sci. (2001) 47:133–150Link, Google Scholar
• Maddala G. S.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• McArthur A. W., Nystrom P. C. Environmental dynamism, complexity and munificence as moderators of strategy-performance relationships. J. Bus. Res. (1991) 23:349–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGahan A., Porter M. What do we know about variance in accounting profitability? Management Sci. (2002) 48:834–851Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath R., MacMillan I.The Entrepreneurial Mindset (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Mendelson H. Organizational architecture and success in the information technology industry. Management Sci. (2000) 46:513–529Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer A. D., Tsui A. S., Hinings C. R. Guest co-editors’ introduction: Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:1175–1195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organization Structure, Strategy, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C. Organizations: New concepts for new forms. California Management Rev. (1986) 28:62–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. R., Roberts J.Economics, Organization and Management (1992) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Miller D. Configurations revisited. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:505–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizik N., Jacobson R. Trading off between value creation and value appropriation: The financial implications of shifts in strategic emphasis. J. Marketing (2003) 67:63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge-Creating Company (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Nystrom P. C., Starbuck W. H.Handbook of Organizational Design (1981) (Oxford University Press, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Park N. K., Mezias J. Before and after the technology sector crash: Stock market response to alliances of e-commerce firms. Strategic Management J. (2005) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Pastor L., Veronesi P. Was there a NASDAQ bubble in the late 1990s? (2004) . Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Poppo L., Zenger T. Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:853–877Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (1980) (Free Press/Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Rajgopal S., Venkatachalam M., Kotha S. Managerial actions, stock returns, and earnings: The case of business-to-business Internet firms. J. Accounting Res. (2002) 40:529–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajgopal S., Venkatachalam M., Kotha S. The value relevance of network advantages: The case of e-commerce firms. J. Accounting Res. (2003) 41:135–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randolph W. A., Dess G. G. The congruence perspective of organization design: A conceptual model and multivariate research approach. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:114–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinartz W., Krafft M., Hoyer W. The CRM process: Its measurement and performance. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41:293–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V., Kotha S. Continuous “morphing:” Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1263–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romanelli E. The evolution of new organizational forms. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1991) 17:79–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romme A. G. L. Making a difference: Organization as design. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:558–573Link, Google Scholar
• Rumelt R., Teece D. J. Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. The Competitive Challenge (1987) (Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA) 137–158Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. How much does industry matter? Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:167–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (1934 (Reprint 1996)) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. Takeovers in the 60s and the 80s: Evidence and implications. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:51–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman B., Baum J. A. C. Organizational economics. Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2001) (Blackwell Publishers, London, UK) 465–493Google Scholar
• Sorensen J. The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:70–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Sorensen J. Finding the right mix: Franchising, organizational learning, and chain performance. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:713–724Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A., March J. G. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 142–193Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:315–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A., Hudson D., Schroeder M. Designing new business startups: Entrepreneurial, organizational, and ecological considerations. J. Management (1984) 10:87–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies—Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E., Ronen J. Organizational innovation: The transaction cost approach. Entrepreneurship (1983) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) 101–133Google Scholar
• Zimmerman M. A., Zeitz G. J. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27:414–431Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C. Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:97–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C., Amit R. Exploring the fit between business strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. (2006) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Zott C., Huy Q. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. (2006) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar