Expertise and Collaboration in the Geographically Dispersed Organization

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0263

References

  • Ackerman M., Smith J. B., Smith F. D., Malone T. W. Augmenting the organizational memory: A field study of Answer Garden. Proc. ACM Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW’94) (1994) (ACM Press, Chapel Hill, NC) 243–252Google Scholar
  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Armstrong D. J., Cole P., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 167–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker M. C. Managing dispersed knowledge: Organizational problems, managerial strategies and their effectiveness. J. Management Stud. (2001) 38(7):1037–1051CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belsley D., Kuh E., Welsch R.Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (1980) (John Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandon D. P., Hollingshead A. B. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):633–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark H., Brennan S., Resnick L. B., Levine J. M., Teasley S. D. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (1991) (APA Books, Washington, D.C.) 127–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox D. R., Snell E. J.The Analysis of Binary Data (1989) 2nd ed.(Chapman and Hall, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:346–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):352–364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings J. N., Kiesler S. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Soc. Stud. Sci. (2005) 35(5):703–722CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Curtis B., Krasner H., Iscoe N. A field study of the software design process for large systems. Comm. ACM (1988) 31:1268–1287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Empson L. Introduction: Knowledge management in professional service firms. Human Relations (2001) 54(7):811–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espinosa J. A., Carmel A. The effect of time separation on coordination costs in global software teams: A dyad model. Proc. 37th Hawaii Internet Conf. System Sci. (2004) (IEEE)Google Scholar
  • Even-Shoshan M., Gilad T. Network your way to better recruitment. Workforce (1999) 78(6):106–113Google Scholar
  • Finholt T. A., Sproull L., Kiesler S., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Outsiders on the inside: Sharing know-how across space and time. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78:1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996a) 7(4):375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996b) 17(Winter Special Issue):109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grudin J. Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. Proc. ACM Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. (1988) (ACM Press, New York) 85–93Google Scholar
  • Herbsleb J. D., Mockus A. An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (2003) 29(3):1–14Google Scholar
  • Hinds P., Bailey D. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):615–632LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P., Mortensen M. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):290–307LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P., Pfeffer J., Ackerman M., Pipek V., Wulf V. Why organizations don’t “know what they know:” Cognitive and motivational factors affecting the transfer of expertise. Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management (2003) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 1–22Google Scholar
  • Hitt M. A., Bierman L., Shimizu K., Kochhar R. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):13–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S.Applied Logistic Regression (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Kanfer R., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. Motivation theory and industrial/organizational psychology. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1990) 1(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 75–170Google Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. (1999) 16:183–210Google Scholar
  • Kraut R. E., Egido C., Galegher J., Galegher J., Kraut R. E., Egido C. Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (1990) (Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 149–171Google Scholar
  • Kraut R. E., Fussell S. R., Brennan S. E., Siegel J., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 137–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee-Kelley L. Situational leadership: Managing the virtual project team. J. Management Development (2002) 21(5/6):461–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lepak D., Snell S. The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(1):31–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Perspect. Soc. Psych. B (1995) 21:384–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowendahl B. R., Revang O., Fosstenlokken S. M. Knowledge and value creation in professional service firms: A framework for analysis. Humam Relations (2001) 54(7):911–931CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maister D. H.Managing the Professional Service Firm (1993) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Malhotra A., Stamps J., Lipnack J. Can absence make a team grow stronger? Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(5):131–155Google Scholar
  • Mark G. Large-scale distributed collaboration: Tension in a new interaction order. Proc. Soc. Informatics Workshop (2005) Irvine, CA. http://crito.uci.edu/2/si/resources.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Mark G., Grudin J., Poltrock S. E., Bodker S., King M., Schmidt M. K. Meeting at the desktop: An empirical study of virtually collocated teams. Proc. 6th Eur. Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands) 159–178Google Scholar
  • May A., Carter C. A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry. Internet J. Indust. Ergonomics (2001) 27(3):171–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maybury M., D’Amore R., House D., Ackerman M., Pipek V., Wulf V. Automated discovery and mapping of expertise. Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management (2003) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Miner J. B., Crane D. P., Vandenberg R. J. Congruence and fit in professional role motivation theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):86–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nardi B. A., Whittaker S., Hinds P., Kiesler S. The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 83–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nordhaug O., Gronhaug K. Competences as resources in firms. Internet J. Human Resource Management (1994) 5:89–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson G. M., Olson J. S. Distance matters. Human-Comput. Interaction (2000) 15:139–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pipek V., Hinrichs J., Wulf V., Ackerman M., Pipek V., Wulf V. Sharing expertise: Challenges for technical support. Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management (2003) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 111–136Google Scholar
  • Priem R. L., Butler J. E. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(1):22–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Steensma H. K. Disentangling the theories of firm boundaries: A path model and empirical test. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):387–401LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how and intangible assets. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):55–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walther J. B., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Time effects in computer-mediated groups: Past, present, and future. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 235–257Google Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weisband S., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 311–334Google Scholar
  • White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica (1980) 48(4):817–838CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.