Developing Issue-Selling Effectiveness over Time: Issue Selling as Resourcing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0266

References

  • Abbott A., Ragin C., Becker H. What do cases do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis. What is a Case? Exploring Foundations of Social Inquiry (1992) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 53–82Google Scholar
  • Anderson P., Blatt R., Christianson M., Grant A., Marquis C., Neuman E., Sonenshein S., Sutcliffe K. Understanding mechanisms in organizational research: Reflections from a collective journey. J. Management Inquiry (2006) 15:102–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashford S., Rothbard N., Piderit S., Dutton J. Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:23–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bacharach S., Baratz M. Decision and nondecisions: An analytical framework. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1963) 57:641–651Google Scholar
  • Bansal P. From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environment issues. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:510–527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S., Tolbert P. S. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ. Stud. (1997) 18:93–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benford R. D., Snow D. A. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2000) 26:611–639CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P.Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D., Burkhardt M. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(3):441–470CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman R. A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Acad. Management Rev. (1983) 8:61–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:442–455LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:555–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P., Rebentisch E. Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. (2003) 49:1180–1195LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Clegg S. R., Hardy C. Some dare call it power. Handbook of Organization Studies (1996) (Sage Publications, London, UK) 622–641Google Scholar
  • Creed W., Scully M., Austin J. Clothes make the person?: The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:475–496LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crozier M.The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (1964) (Tavistock, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Dahl R. The concept of power. Behavioral Sci. (1957) 2(3):201–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J., Ashford S. Selling issues to top management. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:397–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J., Jackson S. Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12:76–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J., Ashford S., Lawrence K., Miner-Rubino K. Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:355–369LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J., Ashford S., O’Neill R., Lawrence K. Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:716–736CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J., Ashford S., Wierba E., O’Neill R., Hayes E. Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for issue selling to top managers. Strategic Management J. (1997) 15:407–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fairhurst G. Reframing The Art of Framing: Problems and prospects for leadership. Leadership (2005) 1(2):165–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farmer S., Maslyn J., Fedor D., Goodman J. Putting upward influence strategies in context. J. Organ. Behav. (1997) 18:17–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(3):295–309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Floyd S., Woolridge B. Middle management involvement in strategy and its association with strategic type: A research note. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:153–167CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Floyd S., Woolridge B. Middle management’s strategic influence and organizational performance. J. Management Stud. (1997) 34(3):465–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine de Gruyter, New York) Google Scholar
  • Goffman E.Forms of Talk (1981) (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
  • Golden B. The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:848–860CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardy C., Hardy C. Power and politics in organizations. Managing Strategic Action (1994) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 220–238Google Scholar
  • Hickson D., Hinings C., Lee R., Schenck R., Pennings J. A structural contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 16:216–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman A. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:351–371CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville J. A.Corporate Culture and Environmental Practice: Managing Change at a High-Tech Manufacturer (2007) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) Google Scholar
  • Johnson G., Melin L., Whittington R. Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view. J. Management Stud. (2003) 40:3–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kipnis D., Schmidt S., Wilkinson I. Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. J. Appl. Psych. (1980) 65:440–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lueger M., Sandner K., Meyer R., Hammerschmid G. Contextualizing influence activities: An objective hermeneutical approach. Organ. Stud. (2005) 26(8):1145–1168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lukes S.Power: A Radical View (1974) (McMillan, London, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maguire S., Hardy C., Lawrence T. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(5):657–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Mowday R. T. The exercise of upward influence in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1978) 23:137–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:404–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Østerlund C., Carlile P. Relations in practice: Sorting through theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. Inform. Soc. (2005) 21:91–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(4):527–548CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Phillips N. Bringing the organization back in: A comment on conceptualizations of power in upward influence. J. Organ. Behav. (1997) 18:43–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranson S., Hinings B., Greenwood R. The structuring of organizational structures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(1):1–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilit W. K., Locke E. A. A study of upward influence in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:304–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilit W. K., Paine F. T. An examination of the underlying dynamics of strategic decisions subject to upward influence activity. J. Management Stud. (1987) 24:161–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schön D. A.The Reflective Practitioner (1983) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schutz A., Luckmann T.The Structures of the Life-World (1973) (Heinemann, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Sewell W. H. J. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. (1992) 98(1):1–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonenshein S. Crafting social issues at work. Acad. Management J. (2005) 49(6):1158–1172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Yukl G., Falbe C. Influence tactics in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75:416–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yukl G., Falbe C. The importance of difference sources of power in downward and lateral relations. J. Appl. Psych. (1991) 76:416–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yukl G., Kim H., Falbe C. M. Antecedents of influence outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81:309–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.