Small Worlds and Regional Innovation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0289

References

  • Acs Z., Anselin L., Varga A. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res. Policy (2002) 31:1069–1085CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(3):425–457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albert M. B., Narin F., Avery D., McAllister P. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Res. Policy (1991) 20:251–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile T., Hadley C. N., Kramer S. J. Creativity under the gun. Special issue on the innovative enterprise: Turning ideas into profits. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(8):52–61Google Scholar
  • Amaral L., Scala A., Barthelemy M., Stanley H. Classes of small-world networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. (2000) 97(21):11149–11152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angel D. The labor market for engineers in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Econom. Geography (1989) 65(2):99–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balconi M., Breschi S., Lissoni F. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Res. Policy (2004) 33:127–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabasi A., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286:509–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batagelj V., Mrvar A. P. A program for large network analysis. (1998) . Connections 21, 47–57. Pajek v. 0.91, 2003. http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Shipilov A. V., Rowley T. J. Where do small worlds come from? Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12:697–725CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Breschi S., Lissoni F. knowledge networks from patent data: Methodological issues and research targets. (2004) . Working Paper 150, Centro di Ricerca sui Processi di Innovazione e InternazionalizzazioneGoogle Scholar
  • Bureau of Economic Analysis Bureau of economic analysis, regional economic accounts local area personal income. (2004) . http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/regional/reis/. Deflation data http://www.census.gov/hhes/income/income02/cpiurs.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110:349–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen R. Interview by author. (2003) . Cambridge, MA (November 12)Google Scholar
  • Cowan R., Jonard N. The dynamics of collective invention. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2003) 52:513–532CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cowan R., Jonard N. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2004) 28:1557–1575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davila A., Foster G., et al. Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. J. Bus. Venturing (2003) 18(6):689–708CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G. F., Yoo M., Baker W. E. The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organ. (2003) 1:301–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dodds P., Muhamad R., Watts D. An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science (2003) 301:827–829CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feinberg S. E., Gupta A. K. Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:823–845CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Indust. Corporate Change (2001) 10(4):861–892CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., Marx M. Managing creativity in small worlds. California Management Rev. (2006) 48(4):6–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., Mingo S., Chen D. Collaborative brokerage, geuevative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2007a) 52:443–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., Colfer L., Marin A., McPhie J., Powell W., Padgett J. Why the valley went first: Aggregation and emergence in regional inventor networks. Market Emergence and Transformation (2007b) (Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Florida R. America's looming creativity crisis. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(10):122–124126, 128Google Scholar
  • Friedrich R. In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. Amer. J. Political Sci. (1982) 26(4):797–833CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Froix M. Personal interview by author. (2003) . Palo Alto, CA (July 8)Google Scholar
  • Gilson R. J. The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete. New York University Law Rev. (1999) 74:575–629Google Scholar
  • Gittleman M. Does geography matter for science based firms? Epistemic communities and the geography of patenting and research in biotechnology. (2003) . Working paper, Stern School of BusinessCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers P., Lerner J. The use of covenants: An empirical analysis of venture partnership agreements. J. Law Econom. (1996) 39:463–498CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goyal S., Leij M., Moraga-Gonzalez J. Economics: An emerging small world? (2004) . Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI2004-001/1Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78:1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W.Econometric Analysis (2002) (Prentice Hall, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A.How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hausman J., Hall B., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents R&D relationship. Econometrica (1984) 52:909–938CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunt M., Ogden T., Neale M. Who's really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):464–477LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hyde A.Working in Silicon Valley: Economics and Legal Analysis of a High-Velocity Labor Market (2003) (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) Google Scholar
  • Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Hendeson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 434:578–598Google Scholar
  • Katz A. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:81–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaufman C. Interview by author. (2003) . Westford, MA (August)Google Scholar
  • Khanna P. Interview by author. (2003) . Fremont, CA (July 10)Google Scholar
  • Kino G. Interview by author. (2003) . Stanford, CA (July 8)Google Scholar
  • Kogut B., Walker G. The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2001) 66:317–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koning P. Interview by author. (2003) . Cambridge, MA (August)Google Scholar
  • Kozlovsky W. Interview by author. (2003) . Stanford, CA (December 11)Google Scholar
  • Marshall A.Industry and Trade (1919) (MacMillan, London) Google Scholar
  • McEvily W., Reagans R. Networks and knowledge transfer: The search-transfer problem reconsidered. (2005) . Working paper, Tepper School of BusinessGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily W., Zaheer A., Kramer R., Cook K. Architects of trust: The role of network facilitators in geographical clusters. Trust and Distrust in Organizations (2004) (Rusell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Milgram S. The small world problem. Psych. Today (1967) 1:60–67Google Scholar
  • Nerkar A., Paruchuri S. Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role or knowledge networks within the firm. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):771–785LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. of the United States of America (2001) 98:404–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M., Watts D. Scaling and percolation in the small-world network model. Physical Rev. Part E (1999) 60:7332–7342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M., Watts D., Strogatz S. Random graph models of social networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. of the United States of America (2002) 99:2566–2572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:100–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(1):5–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perlman R. Interview with author. (2003) . Cambridge, MA (August)Google Scholar
  • Piore M., Sabel C.The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:240–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ribi H. Interview by author. (2003) . Cambridge, MA to Burlingame, CA (June 12)Google Scholar
  • Risk W. Interview by author. (2003) . San Jose, CA (July 9)Google Scholar
  • Robinson W. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1950) 15(3):351–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian A.Regional Advantage (1994) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Phelps C. C. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. (2007) 53:1113–1126LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. (2005) 51:756–770LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Solow R. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1957) 39:312–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O., Audia P. The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the U.S., 1940–1989. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106:324–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O., Stuart T. Syndication networks and spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(6):1546–1588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O., Rivkin J., Fleming L. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res. Policy (2006) 35:994–1017CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart R. Interview by author. (2004) . Cambridge, MA (June 17)Google Scholar
  • Stuart T., Podolny J. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1996) SummerGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T., Podolny J., Andrews S., Knoke D. Positional causes and correlates of strategic alliances in the semiconductor industry. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (1999) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 161–182Google Scholar
  • Stuart T., Sorenson O. Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:175–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton R., Hargadon A. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(4):685–718CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best transfer within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Umatoy S. Interview by author. (2003) . San Jose, CA, July 9Google Scholar
  • University of Virginia County business patterns online. (2004) . Geospatial and Statistical Data Center, University of Virginia Library. http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/collections/stats/cbp/Google Scholar
  • U.S. Patent Office (2003) . Patents BIB (January)Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Spiro J. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. (2006) 111(2):447–504CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verspagen B., Duysters G. The small worlds of strategic technology alliances. Technovation (2003) 23Google Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105:493–527CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D., Strogatz S. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature (1998) 393:440–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ZIPList5 MSA (2003) . CD Light, LLC. http://www.zipinfo.com/products/z5msa/z5msa.htmGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.