Combining Patent Law Expertise with R&D for Patenting Performance

References

• Adner R., Helfat C. E. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 22(10):1011–1025Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:317–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G., Katila R. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(3):197–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker V. L., Mueller G. C. CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Sci. (2002) 48(6):782–801Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B.Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantages (1997) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Barney J. B., Zajac E. J. Competitive organizational behavior: Toward an organizationally-based theory of competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:5–9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N., Van Reenen J. Patents, real options and firm performance. Econom. J. (2002) 112(478):97–116Google Scholar
• Blundell R., Griffith R., Van Reenen J. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Econom. J. (1995) 105(429):333–344Google Scholar
• Burton M. D., Sørensen J., Beckman C. M., Lounsbury M., Ventresca M. Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (2002) Vol. 19(Elsevier/JAI Press, New York) 229–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron A. C., Trivedi P. K.Regression Analysis of Count Data (1998) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter M. A. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(3):275–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castanias R. P., Helfat C. E. Managerial resources and rents. J. Management (1991) 17(1):155–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Mowery D. M., Bozeman B., Crow M., Link A. Firm heterogeneity and R&D: An agenda for research. Strategic Management of Industrial R&D (1984) (DC Heath Books, Lexington, MA) 107–132Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). (2000) . NBER Working Paper 7552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conner K. R. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? J. Management (1991) 17(1):121–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeCarolis D. M., Deeds D. L. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(10):953–968Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35(12):1504–1511Link, Google Scholar
• Fox S. P., Sullivan P. Intellectual property management: From theory to practice. Profiting from Intellectual Capital (1998) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 142–156Google Scholar
• Gourieroux C., Monfort A., Trognon A. Pseudo-maximum likelihood methods: Applications to Poisson models. Econometrica (1984) 52(3):701–720Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1997) (Prentice Hall, Upper Sadle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature (1990) 28(4):1661–1707Google Scholar
• Griliches Z., Hall B. H., Pakes A. R&D, patents, and market value revisited: Is there a second (technological opportunity) factor? Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1991) 1(3):183–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z., Pakes A., Hall B. H., Dasgupta P., Stoneman P. The value of patents as indicators of incentive activity. Economic Policy and Technological Performance (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 97–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grindley P. C., Teece D. J. Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Rev. (1997) 39(2):8–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Higgins M. C. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of inter-organizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(2):127–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. Exploring the patent explosion. J. Tech. Transfer (2004) 30:35–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Ziedonis R. H. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(1):101–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Griliches Z., Hausman J. A. Patents and R and D: Is there a lag? Internat. Econom. Rev. (1986) 27(2):265–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. (2001) . NBER Working Paper 8498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36:16–38Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper echelons—the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):193–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J., Hall B., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica (1984) 52(4):909–938Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins M. C., Gulati R. Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):244–263Link, Google Scholar
• Higgins M. C., Gulati R. Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(1):1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Fogarty M. S., Banks B. A. Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(2):183–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M., Zajac E. J. Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(6):507–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kortum S., Lerner J. What is behind the recent surge in patenting? Res. Policy (1999) 28(1):1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kusunoki K., Nonaka I., Nagata A. Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: A conceptual framework and empirical findings. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(6):699–718Link, Google Scholar
• Levin R., Klevorick A., Nelson R., Winter S. Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1987) 1987(3):783–831Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang K. Y., Zeger S. L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika (1986) 73(1):13–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman S. A., Rumelt R. P. A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1069–1086Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E. Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Sci. (1986) 32:173–181Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Markman G. D., Espina M. I., Phan P. H. Patents as surrogates for inimitable and non-substitutable resources. J. Management (2004) 30(4):529–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCullagh P., Nelder J. A.Generalized Linear Models (1989) 2nd ed.(Chapman and Hall, London, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moran P., Ghoshal S. Markets, firms, and the process of economic development. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):390–412Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicholls-Nixon C. L., Woo C. Y. Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(7):651–666Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (1995) (Oxford Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(9):697–713Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A. On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(2):390–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A., Griliches Z. Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look. Econom. Lett. (1980) 5:377–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner-Hahn J., Shaver J. M. Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(2):121–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. P., Lamb R. B. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management (1974) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 556–570Google Scholar
• Scherer F. M. Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1965) 55(5):1097–1125Google Scholar
• Somaya D. Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(1):17–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasik E.Patent or Perish: A Guide for Gaining and Maintaining Competitive Advantage in the Knowledge Economy (2003) (Althos, Fuquay Varina, NC) Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15(6):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas A. S., Litschert R. J., Ramaswamy K. The performance impact of strategy-manager co-alignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(7):509–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of inventions. RAND J. Econom. (1990) 21:172–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5(2):171–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema M. F., Bantel K. A. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(1):91–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson I. O., Cable D. M. Organizational hiring patterns, interfirm network ties, and interorganizational imitation. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(3):349–358Crossref, Google Scholar