Product Demography of De Novo and De Alio Firms in the Optical Disk Drive Industry, 1983–1999

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0301

References

  • Agarwal R., Echambadi R., Franco A. M., Sarkar M. B. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:501–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W. P. The dynamics of competitive intensity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:128–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., Freeman J. Too much of a good thing? Product proliferation and organizational failure. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):539–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., McKendrick D. G. Why are some organizations more competitive than others? Evidence from a changing global market. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:535–571Google Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., Swanson A.-N., Sorenson O. Asymmetric selection among organizations. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12:673–695CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barthelemy J. Sourcing in noses in the fragrance industry across its history. (2006) . Unpublished manuscript, ESSEC, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Korn H. J., Kotha S. Dominant designs and population dynamics in telecommunications services: Founding and failure of facsimile transmission service organizations, 1965–1992. Soc. Sci. Res. (1995) 24:97–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bayus B. L. An analysis of product lifetimes in a technologically dynamic industry. Management Sci. (1998) 44(6):763–775LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bruderl J., Schussler R. Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:530–547CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruderl J., Preisendorfer P., Ziegler R. Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1992) 57:227–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buechler S. M.Social Movements in Advanced Capitalism: The Political Economy and Social Contraction of Activism (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Hannan M. T.The Demography of Corporations and Industries (2000) (Princeton Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Khessina O. M., Alvarez S. A., Agarwal R., Sorenson O. The ecology of entrepreneurship. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives (2005) (Springer, New York) 167–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Bigelow L. S., Seidel M.-D. L., Tsai L. B. The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American automobile industry, 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:117–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen C. M., Rosenbloom R. S. Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value networks. Res. Policy (1995) 24:233–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cottrell T., Nault B. R. Product variety and firm survival in the microcomputer software industry. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:1005–1025CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Figueiredo J. M., Kyle M. K. Surviving the gales of creative destruction: The determinants of product turnover. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27:241–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Disk/Trend, Inc.Disk/Trend Report: Optical Disk Drives (1985–1999) (Disk/Trend, Inc., Mountain View, CA) Google Scholar
  • Dobrev S. D., Kim T., Hannan M. T. Dynamics of niche width and resource partitioning. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106:1299–1337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunne T., Roberts M. J., Samuelson L. Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. manufacturing industries. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19:495–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esener S. C., Forrest S. Optical storage technology. Optoelectronics in Japan and the United States (1996) 35–64JTEC Panel Report, International Technology Research Institute, Loyola College, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Esener S. C., Esener S. C., Kryder M. H. Introduction-optical storage. The Future of Data Storage Technologies (1999) 1–9WTEC Panel Report, WTEC Hyper-Librarian, International Technology Research Institute, Loyola College, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman J., Singh J. V. Ecological analysis of semiconductor firm mortality. Organizational Evolution: New Directions (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 53–77Google Scholar
  • Greenstein S. M., Wade J. B. The product life cycle in the commercial mainframe computer market, 1968–1982. RAND J. Econom. (1998) 29:772–789CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49:149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The ecology of organizational mortality: American labor unions, 1836–1985. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94:25–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Pólos L., Carroll G. R. Cascading organizational change. Organ. Sci. (2003a) 14(5):463–482LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Pólos L., Carroll G. R. The fog of change: Opacity and asperity in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003b) 48:399–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Carroll G. R., Dobrev S. D., Han J. Organizational mortality in European and American automobile industries, Part I: Revisiting the effects of age and size. Eur. Sociol. Rev. (1998) 14:279–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A., Nonnemaker L. Competition in multiple geographic markets: The impact on growth and market entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:232–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerin R. A., Kalyanaram G., Howard D. J. Product hierarchy and brand strategy influences on the order of entry effect for consumer packaged goods. J. Product Innovation Management (1996) 13:21–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khessina O. M. Entry mode, technological innovation and firm survival in the worldwide optical disk drive industry, 1983–1999. (2003) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Khessina O. M., Baum J. A. C., Dobrev S. D., van Witteloostujin A. Direct and indirect effects of product portfolio on firm survival in the worldwide optical disk drive industry, 1983–1999. Ecology and Strategy: Adv. Strategic Management (2006) 23(JAI, Oxford, UK) 591–630CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King A. A., Tucci C. L. Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):171–186LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S., Simons K. L. Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:997–1016CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidi ties: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:S111–S125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J. An empirical analysis of a technology race. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28:228–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman M., Montgomery B. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:S41–S58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKendrick D. G., Carroll G. R. On the genesis of organizational forms: Evidence from the market for disk drive arrays. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(6):661–682LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McKendrick D. G., Donner R. F., Haggard S.From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry (2000) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
  • McKendrick D. G., Jaffee J., Carroll G. R., Khessina O. M. In the bud? Analysis of disk array producers as a (possibly) emergent organizational form. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:60–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merrill Lynch and Co., McKinsey and Company The storage report—Customer perspectives and industry evolution. (2001) . Special report of a joint industry studyGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell W. The dynamics of evolving markets: The effects of business sales and age on dissolutions and divestitures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:575–602CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miyazaki K.Building Competencies in the Firm: Lessons from Japanese and European Optoelectronics (1995) (St. Martin's Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nerkar A., Roberts P. W. Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:779–799CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noble G. W. Conspicuous failures and hidden strengths of the ITRI model: Taiwan's technology policy toward hard disk drives and CD-ROMs. (2000) . Report 2000–02, The Information Storage Industry Center, University of California, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen T., Masden P. Time-aggregation bias in continuous-time hazard-rate models. Sociological Methodology (1991) 21(Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 263–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98:829–872CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Purcell L.CD-R/DVD: Disc Recording Demystified (2000) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rao H. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:29–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxonhouse G. R., Forrest S. Optoelectronics in Japan: Some economic considerations. Optoelectronics in Japan and the United States (1996) 137–162JTEC Panel Report, International Technology Research Institute, Loyola College, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. Stpiece: A program for the estimation of piecewise-constant rate hazard models in STATA 6.0. (1999) . Unpublished ado-file, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B., Stuart T. E. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:81–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O. Letting the market work for you: An evolutionary perspective on product strategy. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:577–592CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stavins J. Model entry and exit in a differentiated-product industry: The personal computer market. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1995) 77:571–584CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Acad. Management Rev. (1981) 6:577–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L., March J. G. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 142–193Google Scholar
  • Swanson A.-N. Form coherence and the fates of de alio and de novo organizations in the U.S. digital computer industry: 1951–1994. (2002) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor J., Johnson M. R., Crawford C. G.DVD Demystified (2006) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Anderson P. C. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman E. The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104:1398–1438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.