Founding the Future: Path Dependence in the Evolution of Top Management Teams from Founding to IPO

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0311

References

  • Aldrich H. E.Organizations Evolving (1999) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E., Zimmer C., Sexton D. L., Smilor R. W. Entrepreneurship through social networks. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (1986) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 3–23Google Scholar
  • Ancona D., Caldwell D. F. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:321–341LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Rider C. I. A garage and an idea: What more does an entrepreneur need? California Management Rev. (2005) 48:6–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron J. N., Burton M. D., Hannan M. T. The road taken: Origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5:239–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron J. N., Burton M. D., Hannan M. T. Engineering bureaucracy: The genesis of formal policies, positions, and structures in high-technology firms. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1999) 15:1–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baty G. B., Evan W. M., Rothermel T. W. Personnel flows as interorganizational relations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 16:430–443CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C. M. The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):741–758CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Burton M. D., O'Reilly C. Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing (2007) 22(2):147–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boeker W., Carroll G. R. Organizational origins: Entrepreneurial and environmental imprinting at time of founding. Ecological Models of Organizations (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 33–51Google Scholar
  • Boeker W. Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boeker W., Karichalil R. Entrepreneurial transitions: Factors influencing founder departure. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:818–826CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boeker W., Wiltbank R. New venture evolution and managerial capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:123–133LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boone C., van Olffen W., van Witteloostuijn A., De Brabander B. The genesis of top management team diversity: Selective turnover among top management teams in Dutch newspaper publishing, 1970–94. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:633–656CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:875–893CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton M. D., Beckman C. M. Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2007) 72:239–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton M. D., Sørensen J. B., Beckman C., Lounsbury M., Ventresca M. Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (2002) 19(JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT) 229–262Google Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Harrison J. R. Organizational demography and culture: Insights from a formal model and simulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:637–667CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Certo S. T., Covin J. G., Daily C. M., Dalton D. R. Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6/7):641–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charan R., Hofer C. W., Mahon J. F. From entrepreneurial to professional management: A set of guidelines. J. Small Bus. Management (1980) 18:1–10Google Scholar
  • Cooper A. C., Gimeno-Gascon F. J., Woo C. Y. Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing (1994) 9:371–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cronbach L. Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analysis recently proposed. Psych. Bull. (1987) 102:414–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dearborn D. W. C., Simon H. A. Selective perception: A note on the departmental identification of executives. Sociometry (1958) 21(2):140–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Downs A.Inside Bureaucracy (1967) (Little Brown, Inc., Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Organizational growth: Linking founding teams, strategy, environment and growth among U.S. semi-conductor ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 28:274–291Google Scholar
  • Fine S. A., Cronshaw S. F.Functional Job Analysis: A Foundation for Human Resources Management (1999) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Florence, KY) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S., Hambrick D. C.Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (1996) (West Publishing Company, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN) Google Scholar
  • Flamholtz E., Randle Y.Growing Pains (2000) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Fligstein N.The Transformation of Corporate Control (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gompers P. A., Lerner J.The Venture Capital Cycle (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Greiner L. E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1972) 50(4):37–46Google Scholar
  • Gulati R., Higgins M. C. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(2):127–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C. Upper echelons theory: An update. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:334–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Mason P. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:193–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49:149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Burton M. D., Baron J. N. Inertia and change in the early years: Employment relations in young, high technology firms. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5:503–536CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Baron J. N., Hsu G., Kocak O. Organizational identities and the hazard of change. Indust. Corporate Change (2006) 15:755–784CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hellmann T., Puri M. The interaction between product market and financing strategy: The role of venture capital. Rev. Financial Stud. (2000) 13(4):959–984CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hellmann T., Puri M. Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. J. Finance (2002) 57:169–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(4):741–763CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M., Zajac E. J. Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(6):507–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keck S. Top management team structure: Differential effects by environmental context. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:143–156LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knight D., Pearce C. L., Smith K. G., Olian J. D., Sims H., Smith K. A., Flood P. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:445–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Batra B. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:585–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence B. The black box of organizational demography. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin D. Y., Wei L. J. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1989) 84:1074–1078CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson J. M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27:415–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michels R.Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (1915) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S. Idiosyncratic jobs in formalized organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1987) 32:327–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mittman B. S., Tolbert P., Bacharach S. Theoretical and methodological issues in the study of organizational demography and demographic change. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (1992) 10(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 3–53Google Scholar
  • Osterman P., Burton M. D., Tolbert P., Batt R. Ports and ladders: The nature and relevance of internal labor markets in a changing world. Oxford Handbook on Work and Organization (2004) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Staw B., Cummings L. Organizational demography. Res. in Organ. Behavior (1983) 5(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 299–357Google Scholar
  • Phillips D. J. A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:474–506CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips D. J. Organizational genealogies and the persistence of gender hierarchies: The case of Silicon Valley law firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:440–472CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Randel A. E., Jaussi K. S. Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:763–774CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:502–517LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W., McEvily B. How to make the team: Social networks vs. demograhy as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:101–133Google Scholar
  • Roberts E. B.Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M., Bhowmik D. K. Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quart. (1971) 34:523–538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roure J., Keeley R. Predictors of success in new technology based ventures. J. Bus. Venturing (1990) 5:201–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruef M., Aldrich H. E., Carter N. M. The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2003) 68(2):195–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schein E. H.Organizational Culture and Leadership (1992) 2nd ed.(Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Schneider B. The people make the place. Personnel Psych. (1987) 40:437–453CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S., Stuart T. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):154–170LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sine W. D., Mitsuhashi H., Kirsch D. A. Revisiting burns and stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(1):121–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith K., Smith K., Olian J., Sims H., O'Bannon D., Scully J. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:412–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. Executive migration and interorganizational competition. Soc. Sci. Res. (1999) 28:289–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. The organizational demography of racial employment segregation. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110:626–671CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M. Knee-deep in the big muddy—A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1976) 16(1):27–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L., March J. G. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 142–193Google Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:315–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutcliffe K. M. What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(5):1360–1378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10/11):1147–1161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Rosenkopf L. Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the U.S. cement industry. Management Sci. (1996) 42:939–953LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wanous J. P.Organizational Entry: Recruitment, Selection, Orientation, and Socialization of Newcomers (1992) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wasserman N. Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):149–172LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Williams K., O'Reilly C. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behavior (1998) 20:77–140Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.