How Capability Differences, Transaction Costs, and Learning Curves Interact to Shape Vertical Scope

References

• Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple S. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):140–154Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres N. S. Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(2):129–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K.The Limits of Organization (1974) (Norton, New York) Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Sci. (1986) 32(10):1231–1241Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. How a firm's capabilities affect boundary decisions. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40(3):137–146Google Scholar
• Barzel Y. Measurement cost and the organization of markets. J. Law Econom. (1982) 25:27–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capros P., Georgakopoulos T., Van Regemorter D., Proost S., Schmidt T., Conrad K. The GEM-E3 model for the European union. J. Econom. Financial Model (1997) 4:51–160Google Scholar
• Christensen C., Verlinden M., Westerman G. Distribution, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(5):955–994Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase R. H. The nature of the firm. Economica (1937) 4:386–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase R. H. The nature of the firm: Meaning. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1988) 4(Spring):19–32Google Scholar
• Combs J. G., Ketchen D. J. Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: Toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(9):867–888Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deardorff A. V. The general validity of the law of comparative advantage. J. Political Econom. (1980) 88(5):941–957Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H. The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1988) 1:141–161Google Scholar
• Feenstra R. Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy. J. Econom. Perspectives (1998) 12(4):31–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris M. C., Kanzow C., Pardalos P. M., Resende M. G. Complementarity and related problems: A survey. Handbook of Applied Optimization (2002) (Oxford University Press, New York) 514–530Google Scholar
• Ferris M. C., Munson T. S. Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2000) 24:165–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine C.Clockspeed (1998) (Perseus Books, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Gibbons R. Taking coase seriously. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1, March):145–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman S. J., Hart O. D. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):691–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman S. J., Helpman E. Integration versus outsourcing in industry equilibrium. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):85–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrigan K. Vertícal integration and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28(2):397–425Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O. D.Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G. How much you know versus how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(1):75–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides M. G. Industry change through vertical dis-integration: How and why markets emerged in mortgage banking. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(3):465–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides M. G., Hitt L. M. Losing sight of the forest for the trees? Productive capabilities and gains from trade as drivers of vertical scope. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(13):1209–1227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides M. G., Winter S. G. Capabilities, transaction costs and evolution: Understanding the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(5):395–413Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides M. G., Knudsen T., Augier M. Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Res. Policy (2006) 10:1200–1221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joskow P. L., Menard C., Sheley M. Vertical integration. Handbook of New Institutional Economics (2005) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein P. G., Menard C., Sheley M. The make-or-buy decision: Lessons from empirical studies. Handbook of New Institutional Economics (2005) (Kluwer, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopmans T. C.Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation (1951) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N. The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(2):351–385Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N., Foss N. Capabilities and governance: The rebirth of production in the theory of economic organization. Kyklos (1999) 52(2):201–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N., Robertson P. L.Firms, Markets, and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions (1995) (Routledge, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiblein M. J. The choice of organizational governance form and performance: Predictions from transaction cost, resource-based, and real options theories. J. Management (2003) 29:937–961Google Scholar
• Leiblein M. J., Miller D. J. An empirical examination of transaction and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(9):839–860Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. Adaptation in rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Lieberman M., Dhawan R. Assessing the resource base of U.S. and Japanese auto producers: A stochastic frontier production approach. Management Sci. (2005) 51(7):1060–1075Link, Google Scholar
• Macher J. T., Mowery D. C., Baum J. A. C., McGahan A. M. Vertical specialization and industry structure in high technology industries. Business Strategy over the Industry Lifecycle—Advances in Strategic Management (2004) 21(Elsevier, New York) 317–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhok A. Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:535–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F., Orsenigo L., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. History-friendly models of industry evolution: The computer industry. Indust. Corporate Change (1999) 8:1–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Principles of Economics(Macmillan, London) Google Scholar
• Masten S. E., Williamson O. E., Winter S. G. A legal basis for the firm. The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) 196–212Google Scholar
• Masten S. E., Meehan J. W., Snyder S. A. The costs of organization. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7(1):1–25Google Scholar
• Mayer K., Argyres N. S. Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):394–410Link, Google Scholar
• Monteverde K. Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1624–1638Link, Google Scholar
• North D. C. The new institutional economics. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. (1986) 142:230–327Google Scholar
• Pelikan P. Language as a limiting factor for centralization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1969) 59(4):625–631Google Scholar
• Perry M. K., Schmalensee R., Willig R. D. Vertical integration: Determinants and effects. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 185–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L., Zenger T. Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge based and measurement explanations for make or buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(9):853–878Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ricardo D.On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817) (London)Google Scholar
• Richardson G. B. The organization of industry. Econom. J. (1972) 327:883–896Google Scholar
• Riordan M. H., Sappington D. E. Information, incentives and organizational mode. Quart. J. Econom. (1987) 102(2):243–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin P. H. The expansion of firms. J. Political Econom. (1973) 81:936–949Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A., Steensma H. K. Disentangling the theories of firm boundaries: A path model and empirical test. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):387–401Link, Google Scholar
• Shelanski H. A., Klein P. G. Empirical research in transaction cost economics: A review and assessment. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1995) 11(2):335–362Google Scholar
• Silver M.Enterprise and the Scope of the Firm (1984) (Martin Robertson, London) Google Scholar
• Smith A.An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776) (Glasgow, Scotland)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler G. The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. J. Political Econom. (1951) 59(June):185–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Schuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker G., Weber D. A transaction cost approach to make or buy decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(3):373–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker G., Weber D. Supplier competition, uncertainty and make-or-buy decisions. Acad. Management J. (1987) 30:589–596Crossref, Google Scholar
• White L. J. The division of labor is limited by the standardization in the market: A note on Stigler's vertical integration theme. Indust. Organ. Rev. (1978) 5:142–143Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:269–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.The Mechanisms of Governance (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(12):1087–1108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. On coase, competence, and the corporation. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1988) 1:163–180Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Montgomery C. The four R's for strategy: Routines, resources, rents and replication. Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis (1995) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):991–995Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Szulanski G. Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(6):730–743Link, Google Scholar
• Wolter C., Veloso F. M. The effects of innovation on vertical structure: perspectives on transaction costs and competences. Acad. Management Rev. (2008) 33(3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young A. Increasing returns and economic progress. Econom. J. (1928) 38:527–542Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–351Link, Google Scholar