Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefs

References

• AIPLAReport of the Economic Survey (2005) . American Intellectual Property Association Law Practice Management Committee, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
• Allen R. C. Collective invention. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1983) 4(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axelrod R.The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Axlerod R. An evolutionary approach to norms. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1986) 80(4):1095–1111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendor J., Swistak P. The evolution of norms. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(6):1493–1545Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkler Y.The Wealth of Networks (2006) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Bernstein L. Opting out of the legal system: Extralegal contractual relations in the diamond industry. J. Legal Stud. (1992) 21:115–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessen J., Meurer M. J.Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk (2008) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Bouty I. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(1):50–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buccafusco C. J. On the legal consequences of sauces: Should Thomas Keller's recipes be per se copyrightable? Cardozo Arts Entertainment Law J. (2007) 24(3):1121–1156Google Scholar
• Cox C., Jenkins J. Between the seams, a fertile commons: An overview of the relationship between fashion and intellectual property. (2005) (Norman Lear Center Publication, Duke University Law School, Durham, NC) 4–20Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P., David P. A. Toward a new economics of science. Policy Res. (1994) 23:487–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• eGForums The eGullet Society for Culinary Arts and Letters. . http://forums.egullet.org/index.php?showtopic=84509&st=0&p=1149705&#entry1149705Google Scholar
• Ellickson R. C.Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (1991) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elster J. Social norms and economic theory. J. Econom. Perspectives (1989) 3(4):99–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman D. The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(1):47–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbs J. Norms: The problem of definition and classification. Amer. J. Sociol. (1965) 70(5):586–594Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greif A. Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders' coalition. AER (1993) 83(3):525–548Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Dunnette M. Group influences on individuals. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1976) (Rand McNally, Chicago) 1455–1525Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Harhoff D. Post grant review systems at the U.S. patent office: Design parameters and expected impact. Berkeley Law Tech. J. (2004) 19(1):1–27Google Scholar
• Hansmann H., Santilli M. Authors and artists moral rights: A comparative legal and economic analysis. J. Legal Stud. (1997) 26(January):95–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D., Henkel J., von Hippel E. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res. Policy (2003) 32(10):1753–1769Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Lerner J.Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress and What to do About It (2004) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Johnson C., Surlemont B., Nicod P., Revaz F. Behind the stars: A concise typology of Michelin restaurants in Europe. Cornell Hotel Restaurant Admin. Quart. (2005) 46(2):170–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesan J. P., Ball G. G. How are patent cases resolved? An empirical examination of the adjudication and settlement of patent disputes. Washington University, Law Rev. (2006) 84:237–312Google Scholar
• Kreiner K., Schultz M. Informal collaboration in R&D. The formation of networks across organizations. Organ. Stud. (1993) 14(2):189–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50(2):197–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macaulay S. Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1963) 28(55Google Scholar
• Merges R. Contracting into liability rules: Intellectual property rights and collective rights organizations. Californial Law Rev. (1996a) 84(October):1293–1393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merges R. Property rights and the commons: The case of scientific research. Soc. Philosophy Policy (1996b) 13:145–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merges R. From medieval guilds to open source software: Informal norms, appropriability institutions, and innovation. Univ. Wisconson Law School Inst. Legal Stud. Conf. Legal Hist. Intellectual Property (2004) November 13Google Scholar
• Merton R. K.The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1973) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Nguyen K. The good feud guide. TheAge.com.au (2006) March 26). http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/03/25/1143084055425.html#Google Scholar
• Nouvel Observateur Michelin 2005: 3 étoiles pour Régis Marcon. (2005) Google Scholar
• Ostrom E.Governing the Commons (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A. K. Regulating scientific research: Intellectual property rights and the norms of science. Northwestern University Law Rev. (1999) 94(1):77–152Google Scholar
• Raustiala K., Sprigman C. The piracy paradox: Innovation and intellectual property in fashion design. Virginia Law Rev. (2006) 92(8):1687–1777Google Scholar
• Rimal R., Real K. Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Comm. Theory (2003) 13:184–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schrader S. Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through information trading. Res. Policy (1991) 20:153–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simoni C.Mastering the Dynamics of Apparel Innovation (2003) (Firenze University Press, Firenze, Italy) Google Scholar
• Sitkin S. B., Bies R. J., Lewicki R. J., Sheppard B. H. On the positive effect of the legalization of trust. Research on Negotiation in Organizations (1995) 5(JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT) 185–217Google Scholar
• Strandburg K. Users as innovators: Implications for patent doctrine. Univ. Colorado Law Rev. (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Veblen T.The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) . Republished in Penguin 20th Century Classics, Penguin Books (1994)Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. Res. Policy (1987) 16:291–302Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.Democratizing Innovation (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P., Cho C., Cohen W. M. View from the bench: Patents and materials transfers. Science (2005) 309(September 23):2002–2003Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou K. Z., Poppo L. Relational contracts in China: Relational governance and contract assurance. (2005) . Working paper, Virginia TechGoogle Scholar