Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks

References

• Akgun A. E., Byrne J. C., Keskin H., Lynn G. S. Transactive memory system in new product development teams. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2006) 53(1):95–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand V. C., Manz C., Glick W. H. An organizational memory approach to information management. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):796–809Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluger, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Barzel Y.Economic Analysis of Property Rights (1989) (Cambridge Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Bernard H. R., Johnsen E. C., Killworth P. D., McCarty C., Shelley G. A., Robinson S. Comparing four different methods for measuring personal social networks. Soc. Networks (1990) 12:179–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau P. M.Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Boland R. J., Tenkasi R. V., Te'eni D. Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(3):456–475Link, Google Scholar
• Boland R. J., Singh J., Salipante P., Aram J. D., Fay S. Y., Kanawattanachai P. Knowledge representations and knowledge transfer. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):393–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445Link, Google Scholar
• Brandon D. P., Hollingshead A. B. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):633–644Link, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Innovation as a structural interest: Rethinking the impact of network position on innovation adoption. Soc. Networks (1980) 2(4):327–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Network items and the general social survey. Soc. Networks (1984) 6:293–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Campbell K. E., Lee B. A. Name generators in surveys of personal networks. Soc. Networks (1991) 13(4):203–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K. A theory of group stability. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1991) 56:331–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R., Rebentisch E. S. Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. (2003) 49(9):1180–1195Link, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
• Cross R., Cummings J. N. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):928–937Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R., Sproull L. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):446–462Link, Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):352–364Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):170–202Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Contingent organizing for games of innovation: Diverse configurations of core principles for innovative organization designs. Internat. J. Innovation Management (2007) 11(1):115–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engwall M., Svensson C. Cheetah teams. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(2):20–21Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46(12):1554–1568Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Xiao Y. Coordination in fast response organizations. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8):1155–1169Link, Google Scholar
• Fein S. Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 70(6):1164–1184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu Y.-C. Measuring personal networks with daily contacts: A single-item survey question and the contact diary. Soc. Networks (2005) 27:169–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E., Ghose A. The economic incentives for sharing security information. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):186–205Link, Google Scholar
• GAO (2006) . U.S. Government Accountability Office, Homeland Security and Information Sharing, GAO-06-385, U.S. Government Accountability OfficeGoogle Scholar
• Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):213–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Wilson J. M., Neale M., Mannix B., Griffith T. Substitutes for socialization in exocentric teams. Research in Groups and Teams (2000) 3(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 53–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grand S., von Krogh G., Leonard D., Swap W. Resource allocation beyond firm boundaries: A multi-level model for open source innovation. Long Range Planning (2004) 37:591–610Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray P. H., Meister D. B. Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Sci. (2004) 50(6):821–834Link, Google Scholar
• Hagel J., Brown J. S.The Only Sustainable Edge (2005) (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Hannah D. R. Who owns ideas? The effects of trade secret protection procedures on employees' obligations. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):71–84Link, Google Scholar
• Heiman B. A., Nickerson J. A. Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations. Managerial Decision Econom. (2004) 25:401–420Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill R. A., Dunbar R. I. M. Social network size in humans. Human Nature (2003) 14(1):53–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81:1080–1089Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Staples S. Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(1):150–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Tanriverdi H. Knowledge ownership and territoriality: A conceptualization and scenario-based experimental investigation. Best Paper Proc. Acad. Management Conf. (2006) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalman M. E., Monge P., Fulk J., Heino R. Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Comm. Res. (2002) 29(2):125–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Killworth P. D., Johnson E., Bernard H. R., Shelley G. A., McCarty C. Estimating the size of personal networks. Soc. Networks (1990) 12:289–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Korsgaard M. A., Brodt S. E., Whitener E. M. Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(2):312–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R., Thompson L. L., Levine J. M., Messick D. M. Social uncertainty and collective paranoia in knowledge communities. Shared Cognition in Organizations (1999a) (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 163–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999b) 50:569–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laumann E.Prestige and Association in an Urban Community (1966) (Bobbs-Merrill, New York) Google Scholar
• Levin D. Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1477–1490Link, Google Scholar
• Lewicki R. J., McAllister D. J., Bies R. J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):438–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(4):587–604Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K., Lange D., Gallis L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):581–598Link, Google Scholar
• Liang D., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21(4):384–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell M. K., Whitney D. J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):114–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macdonald S., Piekkari R. Out of control: Personal networks in European collaboration. R&D Management (2005) 35(4):441–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Jarvenpaa S. L. Information security in cross-enterprise collaborative knowledge work. Emergence (2005) 6(4):4–8Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Jarvenpaa S. L., Hollingshead A. B. Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):147–161Link, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Malhotra A., John R. Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology-enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):9–27Link, Google Scholar
• Marin A., Hampton K. N. Simplying the personal network name generator: Alternative to traditional multiple and single name generators. Field Methods (2007) 19(2):163–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden P. V. Network data and measurement. Ann. Rev. Soc. (1990) 16:435–463Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massey A. P., Montoya-Weiss M. M. Unraveling the temporal fabric of knowledge conversion: A model of media selection and use. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(1):94–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarty C., Killworth P. D., Bernard H. R., Johnsen E. C., Shelley G. A. Comparing two methods for estimating network size. Human Organ. (2001) 60(1):28–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B., Peronne V., Zaheer A. Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):91–103Link, Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Argote L., Peterson R., Mannix E. Transactive memory in dynamic organizations. Understanding the Dynamic Organization (2003) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 135–162Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Levine J. M., Turner M. Socialization in organizations and work groups. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (2000) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 69–112Google Scholar
• Norman P. M. Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances resource and relational characteristics. J. High Tech. Management Res. (2002) 13:177–202Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen G. A., Eisenhardt K. M. Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):370–386Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P., El Sawy O. The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):198–227Link, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12:69–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical rev. of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(3):240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y., Carley K. M., Argote L. The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):671–682Link, Google Scholar
• Scott S. V., Walsham G. Reconceptualizing and managing reputation risk in the knowledge economy: Toward reputable action. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):308–322Link, Google Scholar
• Swart J., Kinnie N. Sharing knowledge in knowledge-intensive firms. Human Resources Management J. (2003) 13(2):60–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. Explaining internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices with the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Te'eni D. Review: A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):251–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 44(5):996–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulmer R. R., Sellnow T. C. Ambiguity in organizational crisis communication: Jack in the box as a case study. J. Bus. Ethics (2000) 25:143–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Mullen G., Goethals G. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–208Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Erber R., Raymond P. Transactive memory in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1991) 61:923–929Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Roberts K. H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:357–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman B.Networks in the Global Village (1999) (Westview, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 9(2):141–159Google Scholar