The Penguin Has Entered the Building: The Commercialization of Open Source Software Products

References

• Arora A. Licensing tacit knowledge: Intellectual property rights and the market for know-how. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1995) 4:41–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17:99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessen J., Hunt R. M. An empirical look at software patents. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2007) 16:157–189Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C., Giannangeli S. Adaptive entry strategies under dominant standards: Hybrid business models in the Open Source software industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1085–1098Link, Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A., Holbrook M. B. The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. J. Marketing (2001) 65(2):81–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Nelson R., Walsh J. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). (2000) . NBER Working Paper 7552. NBER, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Conner K. R. Strategies for product cannibalism. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:9–26Google Scholar
• Dahlander L., Magnusson M. G. Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Res. Policy (2005) 34(4):481–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dam K. W. Some economic considerations in the intellectual property protection of software. J. Legal Stud. (1995) 24(2):321–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Literature (1988) 26(3):1120–1171Google Scholar
• Economist, The An open secret. (2005) Oct. 20):31–33Google Scholar
• eWeek Novell's earnings fall short. (2005) Aug. 25):8Google Scholar
• Gambardella A., Hall B. Proprietary vs. public domain licensing of software and research products. Res. Policy (2006) 35(6):875–892Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandal N., Greenstein S., Salant D. Adoptions and orphans in the early microcomputer market. J. Indust. Econom. (1999) 47(1):87–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Kumaraswamy A. Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of Sun Microsystems' open systems strategy. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(5):351–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatignon H., Tushman M. L., Smith W., Anderson P. A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Sci. (2002) 48(9):1103–1122Link, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P. Market incumbency and technological inertia. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(2):161–173Link, Google Scholar
• Green W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Gruber M., Henkel J. New ventures based on open innovation: An empirical analysis of start-up firms in embedded Linux. Internat. J. Tech. Management (2006) 33(4):256–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B., MacGarvie M. The private value of software patents. (2006) . NBER Working Paper 12195. NBER, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B., Ziedonis R. The determinants of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1980–1994. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32:101–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardin J., Hilbe J.Generalized Linear Models and Extensions (2001) (Stata Press, College Station, TX) Google Scholar
• Hecker F. Setting up shop: The business of open source software. IEEE Software (1999) 16(1):45–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henkel J. Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux. Res. Policy (2006) 35:953–969Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A. A., Tucci C. L. Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):171–186Link, Google Scholar
• Koenig J. Seven open source business strategies for competitive advantage. IT Manager's J. (2004) May 14Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50(2):197–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. The scope of open source licensing. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2005) 21:20–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mann R. J. Commercializing open source software: Do property rights still matter? Harvard J. Law Technology (2006) 20:1–46Google Scholar
• Mitchell W., Singh K. Incumbents' use of preentry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1992) 18(3):347–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy K. M., Topel R. H. Estimation and inference in 2-step econometric models. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1985) 3(4):370–379Google Scholar
• O'Mahony S. Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1179–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Mahony S., Ferraro F. The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(5):1079–1106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Personal Computer World Let the Linux music play. (2006) 1:15Google Scholar
• PR Newswire Microsoft blocks distribution of desktop Linux in Sweden; Judge issues temporary restraining order halting LindowsOS sales to Swedes. (2003) 7(12, Dec. 11Google Scholar
• Roberts J., Hann I., Slaughter S. Understanding the motivations, participation and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache Projects. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):984–999Link, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. IBM's pragmatic embrace of open source. Comm. ACM (2006) 49(10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seethamraju C., Hand J. R. M., Lev B. The value relevance of trademarks. Intangible Assets: Values, Measures and Risks (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Shah S. K. Motivation, governance and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1000–1014Link, Google Scholar
• Smith G. V., Parr L. R.Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets (2000) 3rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Spaeth S., Stuermer M., Haefliger S., von Krogh G. Sampling in open source software development: The case for using the Debian GNU/Linux distribution. (2006) . Unpublished manuscript, ETH Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
• Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15(1):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terza J. V. Estimating count data models with endogenous switching: Sample selection and endogenous treatment effects. J. Econometrics (1998) 8:129–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torrisi S.Industrial Organisation and Innovation: An International Study of the Software Industry (1998) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:119–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):209–223Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Haefliger S. Knowledge reuse in open source software: An exploratory study of 15 open source projects. Proc. 38th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2005) 198–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziedonis R. H. Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Sci. (2004) 50(6):804–820Link, Google Scholar