An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities

References

• Agrawal A., Knoeber C. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1996) 31:377–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera R. V., Aguilera R. V., Federowicz M. Are Italy and Spain mediterranean sisters? A comparison of corporate governance systems. Corporate Governance in a Changing and Political Environment: Trajectories of Institutional Change on the Europe Continent (2003) (Macmillan Palgrave, London, UK) 23–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera R. V. Corporate governance and director accountability: An institutional comparative perspective. British J. Management (2005) 16S39–S53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera R. V., Cuervo-Cazurra A. Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? Organ. Stud. (2004) 25:415–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera R. V., Jackson G. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(3):447–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadjian C. L., Robbins G. E. A clash of capitalisms: Foreign shareholders and corporate restructuring in 1990s Japan. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2005) 70(3):451–471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson R., Reeb D. Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:209–237Google Scholar
• Aoki M.Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki M., Aoki M., Dore R. The Japanese firm as a system of attributes. The Japanese Firm: Sources of Competitive Strength (1994) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 11–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki M.Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki M., Jackson G. Understanding the emerging diversity of corporate governance and organizational architecture: An essentiality based analysis. Indust. Corporate Change (2008) 17(1):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki M., Patrick H.The Japanese Main Bank System: Its Relevance for Developing and Transforming Economies (1994) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Aoki M., Jackson G., Miyajima H.Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity (2007) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arcot S. R., Bruno V. G. One Size Does Not Fit All, After All: Evidence from Corporate Governance. (2006) . Mimeo graphed. Financial Markets Group, London School of Economics, London, UKGoogle Scholar
• Bansal P., Roth K. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 43(4):717–736Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baums T., Prentice D. D., Holland P. R. J. Takeovers versus institutions in corporate governance in Germany. Contemporary Issues in Corporate Governance (1993) (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK) 151–183Google Scholar
• Beatty R. P., Welch I. Issuer expenses and legal liability in initial public offerings. J. Law Econom. (1996) 39:545–602Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beatty R. P., Zajac E. J. Managerial incentives, monitoring and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(2):313–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L., Fried J.Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation (2004) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Becht M., Roel A. Blockholding in Europe: An international comparison. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1999) 43:1049–1056Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau P. M., Schoenherr R. A.The Structure of Organizations (1971) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Boyd B. K. Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:335–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brennan N. Voluntary disclosure of profit forecasts by target companies in takeover bids. J. Bus. Finance and Accounting (1999) 26:883–918Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buck T. W., Shahrim A. The translation of corporate governance changes across national cultures: The case of Germany. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2005) 36:42–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buck T. W., Filatotchev I., Nolan P., Wright M. Different path to economic reform in Russia and China: Causes and consequences. J. World Bus. (2000) 35(4):379–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo T. S., Daily C. M., Dalton D. R. Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:641–658Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng E., Courtenay S. Board Composition, Regulatory Regime, and Voluntary Disclosure. (2004) . Mimeo graphed. Nanyang Business School, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
• Child J. Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organ. Stud. (1997) 18(1):43–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffee J. C. What caused Enron?: A capsule social and economic history of the 1990s. (2003) . Working Paper 214, Columbia Law and Economics, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Connolly T., Conlon E. J., Deutsch S. J. Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Acad. Management Rev. (1980) 5(2):211–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conyon M. J., Girma S., Thompson S., Wright P. Do hostile mergers destroy jobs? J. Econom. Behavioral Organ. (2001) 45(4):427–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crouch C.Capitalist Diversity and Change. Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crouch C., Streeck W., Boyer R., Amable B., Hall P. A., Jackson G. Dialogue on “institutional complementarity and political economy”. Socio-Econom. Rev. (2005) 2(4):359–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daily C., Dalton D., Rajagopalan N. Governance through ownership: Centuries of practice, decades of research. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:115–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton D., Daily C., Certo S., Roengpitya R. Meta-analysis of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion? Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:13–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton D. R., Daily C. M., Ellstrand A. E., Johnson J. L. Meta-analytic review of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:269–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton D. R., Daily C. M., Johnson J., Ellstrand A. E. Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:674–686Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta D. K., Pinches G. P., Narayanan V. K. Factors influencing wealth creation from mergers and acquisitions: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(1):67–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F. New directions in corporate governance. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2005) 31(1):143–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F., Marquis C. Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):332–343Link, Google Scholar
• Deutsch Y. The impact of board composition on firm's critical decisions: A meta-analytic review. J. Management (2005) 31(3):424–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhnadirek R., Tang J. Corporate governance problems in Thailand: Is ownership concentration the cause? Asia Pacific Bus. Rev. (2003) 10(2):121–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L.The Contingency Theory of Organization (2001) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dore R. Unions between class and enterprise. Industrielle Beziehungen (1996) 3(2):187–196Google Scholar
• Fama E. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Political Econom. (1980) 88:288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E., Jensen M. Agency problems and residual claims. J. Law Econom. (1983) 26:327–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I., Bishop K. Board composition, share ownership and “underpricing” of UK IPO firms. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(10):941–955Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I., Toms S. Corporate governance, strategy and survival in a declining industry: A study of UK cotton textile companies. J. Management Stud. (2003) 40(4):895–920Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I., Wright M.Corporate Governance Life-Cycle (2005) (Edward Elgar, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I., Jackson G., Gospel H., Allcock D. Key drivers of “good” corporate governance and the appropriateness of UK policy responses. (2007) (Department of Trade and Industry, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Fiss P. C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(4):1180–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss P. C., Zajac E. The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49(4):501–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman R. E.Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984) (Pitman, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Gospel H., Pendleton A.Corporate Governance and Labour Management: An International Comparison (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Gourevitch P. A., Shinn J.Political Power and Corporate Control: The New Global Politics of Corporate Governance (2005) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Goyer M., Milhaupt C. Corporate governance, employees, and the focus on core competencies in France and Germany. Global Markets, Domestic Institutions: Corporate Law and Governance in a New Era of Cross-Border Deals (2003) (Columbia University Press, New York) 183–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:109–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall P. A., Soskice D., Hall P. A., Soskice D. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (2001a) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 1–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall P. A., Soskice D.Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (2001b) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C. Taxonomic approaches to studying strategy: Some conceptual and methodological issues. J. Management (1984) 10:27–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., D'Aveni R. A. Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Sci. (1992) 38:1445–1466Link, Google Scholar
• Hart O. The market mechanism as an incentive system. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14:42–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healy P., Palepu K. G. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital market: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 31(1–3):405–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin B. E., Weisbach M. S. Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88:96–118Google Scholar
• Hillman A. J., Dalziel T. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(3):383–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holderness C. G., Sheehan D. P. The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 20:317–346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoshi T., Aoki M., Dore R. The economic role of corporate grouping and the main bank system. The Japanese Firm: The Source of Competitive Strength (1994) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 285–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R. E., Cannella A. A., Tihanyi L., Faraci R. Asset restructuring and business group affiliation in French civil law countries. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(6):525–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R. E., Hitt M. A., Johnson R. A., Grossman W. Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeniety and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:697–716Crossref, Google Scholar
• Itami H., Roehl T.Mobilizing Invisible Assets (1987) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson G., Streeck W., Yamamura K. The origins of nonliberal corporate governance in Germany and Japan. The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison (2001) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) 121–170Google Scholar
• Jackson G. Modeling complementarity: Multiple functions and different levels. Socio-Econom. Rev. (2005a) 3:381–384Google Scholar
• Jackson G. Stakeholders under pressure: Corporate governance and labour management in Germany and Japan. Corporate Governance: An Internat. Rev. (2005b) 13(3):419–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacoby S. M., Gospel H., Pendleton A. Corporate governance and employees in the United States. Corporate Governance and Labour Management: An International Comparison (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 284–309Google Scholar
• Jensen M. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:323–329Google Scholar
• Jensen M., Murphy K. Performance pay and top-management incentives. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(2):225–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:323–329Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C. The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance (1993) 48(3):831–880Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Eur. Financial Management (2001) 7(3):297–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Ruback R. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. J. Financial Econom. (1983) 11:5–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Warner J. B. The distribution of power among corporate managers, shareholders, and directors. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 20:3–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeong D. Y., Aguilera R. V. The evolution of enterprise unionism in Japan: A socio-political perspective. British J. Indust. Relations (Forthcoming) Google Scholar
• Johnson R. B. The board of directors over time: Composition and the organizational life cycle. Internat. J. Management (1997) 14:339–344Google Scholar
• Ketchen D. J., Combs J. G., Russell C. J., Schook C., Dean M. A., Runge J., Lohrke F. T., Nahmann S. E., Haptonstahl D. E., Baker R., Beckstein B. A., Handler C., Honig H., Lamoureux S. Organizational configurations and performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(1):223–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T., Rivkin J. W. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(1):45–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• King D. R., Dalton D. R., Daily C. M., Covin J. G. Meta-analysis of post-acquisitions performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:187–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Ragin C. C. Exploring complexity when diversity is limited: Institutional complementarity in theories of rule of law and national systems revisited. Eur. Management Rev. (2006) 3(1):44–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., MacDuffie J. P., Ragin C. C. Prototypes and strategy: Assigning causal credit using fuzzy sets. Eur. Management Rev. (2004) 1(2):114–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kubo K. Directors' incentive in Japan and the UK. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung (Quart. J. Econom. Res.) (2001) 70(2):228–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kubo K. Executive compensation policy and company performance in Japan. Corporate Governance: An Internat. Rev. (2005) 13(3):429–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lang M., Lundholm R. Voluntary disclosure during equity offerings: Reducing information asymmetry or hyping the stock? Contemporary Accounting Res. (2000) 17(4):623–663Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luoma P., Goodstein J. Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Acad. Management J. (1998) 42(5):553–563Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynall M. D., Goden B. R., Hillman A. J. Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(3):416–431Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney J. T., Pandian J. R. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:363–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mangena M., Pike R. Shareholding of audit committee members, audit committee size and expertise, and the quality of interim financial reporting. British Accounting Association Conf. (2004) York, UKGoogle Scholar
• Manne H. Mergers and the market for corporate control. J. Political Econom. (1965) 73:110–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maurice M., Sellier F., Silvestre J.-J.The Social Foundations of Industrial Power: A Comparison of France and Germany (1986) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Meeks G. K., Roberts C. B., Gray S. J. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK, and continental European multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1995) 26:555–573Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. R., Roberts J. Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica (1990) 59:1255–1277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. R., Roberts J. Complementarities and systems: Understanding Japanese economic organization. Estudios Economicos (1994) 9(1):3–42Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. R., Roberts J. Complementarities, industrial strategy, structure, and change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. (1995) 19:179–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miyajima H., Aoki M., Jackson G., Miyajima H. Relational banking in post bubble Japan: Co-existence of soft and hard-budget constraint. Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity (2007) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:285–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan M.Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Parkinson J.Corporate Power and Responsibility. Issues in the Theory of Company Law (1993) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Penrose E.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Peteraf M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(3):179–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107(1):33–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin C. C.Fuzzy-Set Social Science (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Rao H. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(8):29–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rediker K. J., Seth A. Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:85–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee M., Haunschild P. R. The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):101–117Link, Google Scholar
• Rhodes M., van Apeldoorn B., Rhodes M., Heywood P., Wright V. Capitalism versus capitalism in Western Europe. Developments in West European Politics (1997) (St. Martins Press, London, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V. P., Williamson I. O., Petkova A. P., Sever J. M. Doing good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(6):1033–1049Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabel C. F., Smelser N. J., Sweberg R. Learning by monitoring: The institutions of economic development. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Sako M.Prices, Quality, and Trust. Inter-Firm Relations in Britain and Japan (1992) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders G. W., Boivie S. Sorting things out: Valuation of new firms in uncertain markets. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:167–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt R. H., Spindler G., Gordon J. N., Roe M. J. Path dependence and complementarity in corporate governance. Covergence and Persistance in Corporate Governance (2004) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) 114–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt R. H., Hackethal A., Tyrell M. The convergence of financial systems in Europe. Schmalenbach Bus. Rev. (2002) 1:7–53Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (2003) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Shleifer A., Summers L. H., Auerbach A. J. Breach of trust in hostile takeovers. Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences (1988) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 33–68Google Scholar
• Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. A survey of corporate governance. J. Finance (1997) 52:737–783Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stark D., DiMaggio P. Ambiguous assets for uncertain environments: Heterarchy in postsocialist firms. The Twenty-First-Century Firm. Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective (2001) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 69–104Google Scholar
• Streeck W. The uncertainties of management in the management of uncertainty: Employers, labor relations and industrial adjustment in the 1980s. Work, Employment Soc. (1987) 1(3):281–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Streeck W., Streeck W. Co-determination: After four decades. Social Institutions and Economic Performance. Studies of Industrial Relations in Advanced Capitalist Societies (1992) (Sage Publications, London, UK) 137–168Google Scholar
• Talaulicar T., Grundei J., Werder A. v. Strategic decision making in start-ups: The effect of top management team organization and processes on speed and comprehensiveness. J. Bus. Venturing (2005) 20(4):519–541Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Trento S., Gospel H., Pendleton A. Corporate governance and industrial relations in Italy. Corporate Governance and Labour Management: An International Comparison (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Useem M.Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers Are Changing the Face of Corporate America (1996) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Van den Berghe L., Levrau A., Carchon S., Van der Elst C.Corporate Governance in a Globalising World: Convergence or Divergence? A European Perspective (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verrecchia R. E. Discretionary disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. (1983) 12:179–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• v. Werder A., Talaulicar R., Kolat G. Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code: An empirical analysis of the compliance statements by German listed companies. Corporate Governance: An Internat. Rev. (2005) 13(2):178–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P., Seward J. K. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:421–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Washington M., Zajac E. Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(2):282–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitley R.Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems (1999) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: Analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991a) 36:269–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management J. (1991b) 12:75–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., Filatotchev I. Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based perspective. J. Management Stud. (2004) 41(5):883–895Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang I. Economic consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (2005) . Working paper, University of Rochester, Rochester, NYGoogle Scholar