Coming Forward: The Effects of Social and Regulatory Forces on the Voluntary Restatement of Earnings Subsequent to Wrongdoing

References

• Abrahamson E., Fairchild G. Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:708–740Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E., Rosenkopf L. Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:487–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E., Rosenkopf L. Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:289–309Link, Google Scholar
• Akhigbe A., Kudla R. J., Madura J. Why are some corporate earnings restatements more damaging? Appl. Financial Econom. (2005) 15:327–336Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman E. I. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J. Finance (1968) 23:589–609Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthaud-Day M. L., Certo S. T., Dalton C. M., Dalton D. R. A changing of the guard: Executive and director turnover following corporate financial restatements. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:1119–1136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayres I., Braithwaite J.Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (1992) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Baucus M. S. Pressure, opportunity and predisposition: A multivariate model of organization illegality. J. Management (1994) 20:699–721Google Scholar
• Bedard J. C., Johnstone K. M. Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors' planning and pricing decisions. Accounting Rev. (2004) 79:277–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beneish M. D. Incentives and penalties related to earnings overstatements that violate GAAP. Accounting Rev. (1999) 74:425–457Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benoit W. L.Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies (1995) (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) Google Scholar
• Benson M. L. Denying the guilty mind: Accounting for involvement in a white-collar crime. Criminology (1985) 23:583–606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J. Enforced self-regulation: A new strategy for corporate crime control. Michigan Law Rev. (1982) 80:1466–1507Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J.Crime, Shame, and Reintegration (1989) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J., Fisse B. Asbestos and health: A case of informal social control. Australian-New Zealand J. Criminology (1983) 16:67–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J., Makkai T. Testing an expected utility model of corporate deterrence. Law Soc. Rev. (1991) 25:7–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks M., Highhouse S., Russell S., Mohr D. Familiarity, ambivalence, and organization reputation: Is organization fame a double-edged sword? J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:904–914Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S., Nohria N., Eccles R. The social structure of competition. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard University Press, Boston) 57–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G. R., Swaminathan A. Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106:715–762Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleves M. A., Gould W. W., Gutierrez R. G.An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata (2004) (Stata Press, College Station, TX) Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Cohen P.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Coleman J. W. Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 93:406–439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Core J. E. A review of the empirical disclosure literature: Discussion. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 31:441–456Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox D. R. Regression models and life-tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1972) 34:187–220Google Scholar
• Darley J., Latane B. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1968) 10:215–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson W. N., Jiraporn P., Kim Y. S., Nemec C. Earnings management following duality-creating successions: Ethnostatistics, impression management, and agency theory. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:267–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:583–613Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse D. L. Does isomorphism legitimate? Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:1024–1039Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse D. L. To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:147–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse D. L., Carter S. M. An examination of differences between organisational legitimacy and organisational reputation. J. Management Stud. (2005) 42:329–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai H., Krishnamurthy S., Venkataraman K. Do short sellers target firms with poor earnings quality? Evidence from earnings restatements. Rev. Accounting Stud. (2006) 11:71–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson T., Dunfee T. W. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19:252–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dye R. A. An evaluation of “essays on disclosure” and the disclosure literature in accounting. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 32:181–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The A price worth paying? Auditing Sarbanes-Oxley. (2005) May 21):71–73Google Scholar
• Edelman L. B. Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. Amer. J. Sociol. (1992) 97:1531–1576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman L. B., Uggen C., Erlanger H. S. The endogeneity of legal regulation grievance procedures as rational myth. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105:406–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. (1996) 32:5–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:350–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberg T., Macey J. R. Was Arthur Andersen different? An empirical examination of major accounting firms' audits of large clients. J. Empirical Legal Stud. (2004) 1:263–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach K. D. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:57–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach K. D. Organizational perception management. Res. Organ. Behav. (2003) 25:296–332Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation Securities/commodities fraud. (2004) . http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/fc/ec/about/about_scf.htmGoogle Scholar
• Ferrier W. J., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. The role of competition in market share erosion and dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:372–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Field L., Lowry M., Shu S. Does disclosure deter or trigger litigation? J. Accounting Econom. (2005) 39:497–507Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finney H. C., Lesieur H. R., Bacharach S. B. A contingency theory of organizational crime. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (1982) 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 255–299Google Scholar
• Fligstein N. The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1985) 50:377–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun C. J.Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (1996) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Gayer J. J., Paterson J. S. The association between external monitoring and earnings management in the property-casualty insurance industry. J. Accounting Res. (2001) 39:269–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S., Moran P. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:13–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• General Accounting OfficeFinancial Statement Restatements: Trends, Market Impacts, Regulatory Responses, and Remaining Challenges (2002) (United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greening D. W., Gray B. Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:467–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R. Market niche entry decisions: Competition, learning, and strategy in Tokyo banking, 1894–1936. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:816–836Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen M. F. Structural inertia, imitation, and foreign expansion: South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–1995. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:509–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:293–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., D'Aveni R. A. Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 33:1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris J., Bromiley P. Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:350–367Link, Google Scholar
• Harvard Law Review The good, the bad, and their corporate codes of ethics: Enron, Sarbanes-Oxley, and the problems with legislating good behavior. (2003) 116:2123–2141Google Scholar
• Hasnas J. Up from flatland: Business ethics in the age of divergence. Bus. Ethics Quart. (2007) 17:399–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R. How much is that company worth? Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty and acquisition premiums. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:391–411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R., Miner A. S. Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:472–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H. Follow the leader. Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:593–627Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healy P. M. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. J. Accounting Econom. (1985) 7:85–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healy P. M., Palepu K. G. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 31:405–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellman T., Puri M. The interaction between product market and financing strategy: The role of venture capital. Rev. Financial Stud. (2000) 13:959–984Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman A. J., Ocasio W. Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:414–434Link, Google Scholar
• Hollander E. P. Conformity, status, and the idiosyncrasy credit. Psych. Rev. (1958) 65:117–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huron Consulting GroupAn Analysis of Restatement Matters: Rules, Errors, Ethics (2002) (Huron Consulting Group, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Simons T. Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:1466–1482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Innes R. Self-policing and optimal law enforcement when violator remediation is valuable. J. Political Econom. (1999) 107:1305–1325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ip G. Is a U.S. listing worth the effort? Wall Street Journal (2006) November 28):C1Google Scholar
• Johnson C. Motivated to prosecute. Cracking down on corporate crime. Washington Post (2004) October 20):E1Google Scholar
• Johnson C. Paulson says business is over-regulated: Treasury chief still backs Sarbanes-Oxley. Washington Post (2006a) November 21):D1Google Scholar
• Johnson C. Five years after Enron, firms seek weaker rules. Washington Post (2006b) November 29):A1Google Scholar
• Johnson C. Shift in corporate prosecution ahead. Washington Post (2006c) November 30):D1Google Scholar
• Jones L. M., Foshay N. N. Diffusion of responsibility in a nonemergency situation: Response to a greeting from a stranger. J. Soc. Psych. (1984) 123:155–158Google Scholar
• Kasznik R., Lev B. To warn or not to warn: Management disclosures in the face of an earnings surprise. Accounting Rev. (1995) 70:113–134Google Scholar
• Keating E. K. Sarbanes-Oxley Act: What has it wrought? (2006) . Teaching note. Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Kenny D. A.Correlation and Causality (1979) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• King A. A., Lenox M. J. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's responsible care program. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:698–716Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinney W. R., Palmrose Z.-V., Scholz S. Auditor independence, non-audit services, and restatements: Was the U.S. government right? J. Accounting Res. (2004) 42:561–588Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker D. F. The association between performance plan adoption and corporate capital investment. J. Accounting Econom. (1983) 5:3–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee K., Pennings J. M. Mimicry and the market: Adoption of a new organizational form. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:144–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee F., Peterson C., Tiedens L. Z. Mea culpa: Predicting stock prices from organizational attributions. Personal Soc. Psych. Bull. (2004) 30:1636–1649Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomis C. J. Lies, damned lies, and managed earnings: The crack down is here. Fortune (1999) August):75–92Google Scholar
• Marcus A. A., Goodman R. S. Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting organization policy during a crisis. Acad. Management J. (1991) 14:281–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• May P. J. Compliance motivations: Affirmative and negative bases. Law Soc. Rev. (2004) 38:41–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mercer M. The fleeting effects of disclosure forthcomingness on management's reporting credibility. Accounting Rev. (2005) 80:723–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michel J. G., Hambrick D. C. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:9–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M. S., Fein L. C. The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:653–683Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel I. H., Swenson W. M. The federal sentencing guidelines for corporations: Their development, theoretical underpinnings, and some thoughts about their future. Washington Univ. Law Quart. (1993) 71:205–259Google Scholar
• National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)2004–2005 NCAA Division I Manual: Constitution, Operating Bylaws, Administrative Bylaws (2004) (The National Collegiate Athletic Association, Indianapolis) Google Scholar
• Norris F., Eichenwald K. Fuzzy rules of accounting and Enron. The New York Times (2002) January 30):ClGoogle Scholar
• Ocasio W. Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:187–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Connor J. P., Priem R. I., Coombs J. E., Gilley K. M. Do CEO stock options prevent or promote fraudulent financial reporting? Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:483–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:697–713Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. (1979) 9:833–848Link, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25:129–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmrose Z.-V., Scholz S. The circumstances and legal consequences of non-GAAP reporting: Evidence from restatements. Contemporary Accounting Res. (2004) 21:139–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmrose Z.-V., Richardson V. J., Scholz S. Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. J. Accounting Econom. (2004) 37:59–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paternoster R., Simpson S. S. Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law Soc. Rev. (1996) 30:549–584Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearce F., Tombs S., Matthews R., Young J. Realism and corporate crime. Issues in Realist Criminology (1992) (Sage, London) 70–101Google Scholar
• Pearlstein S. Paulson may find sensible doesn't sell. Washington Post (2006) November 22):D1Google Scholar
• Pedhazur E. J.Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction (1997) (Wadsworth-Thomson Learning, Stamford, CT) Google Scholar
• Peteraf M., Shanley M. Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:165–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfarrer M. D., DeCelles K. A., Smith K. G., Taylor M. S. After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Acad. Management Rev. (2008) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips D. J., Zuckerman E. W. Middle-status conformity, theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107:379–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98:829–872Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:458–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Koput K., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:116–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H., Neilsen E. H. An ecology of agency arrangements: Mortality of savings and loan associations, 1960–1987. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:448–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H., Davis G. F., Ward A. Embeddedness, social identity, and mobility: Why firms leave the NASDAQ and join the New York Stock Exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:268–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H., Greve H., Davis G. F. Fool's gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:502–526Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reason T. The limits of mercy. CFO Magazine (2005) . http://www.cfo.comGoogle Scholar
• Reed G. E., Yeager P. C. Organizational offending and neoclassical criminology: Challenging the reach of a general theory of crime. Criminology (1996) 34:357–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rees J. V.Hostages of Each Other: The Transformation of Nuclear Safety Since Three Mile Island (1994) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richardson S., Tuna I., Wu M. Predicting earnings management: The case of earnings restatements. (2002) . Working paper, the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Rindova V. P., Williamson I. O., Petkova A. P., Sever J. M. Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J. (2005) 1033–1050Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roncek D. W. Using logit coefficients to obtain the effects of independent variables on changes in probabilities. Soc. Forces (1991) 70:509–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik G. R., Meindl J. R. Organization attributions as strategic illusions of management control. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:238–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schnatterly K. Increasing firm value through detection and prevention of white-collar crime. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:587–614Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schuman J. A corporate oversight rule looks set to be eased. Wall Street J. Online (2006) November 10Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (2001) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Short J. L., Toffel M. W. Coerced confessions: Self-policing in the shadow of the regulator. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (2008) 29:45–71Google Scholar
• Siegel P. A., Brockner J. Individual and organizational consequences of CEO claimed handicapping: What's good for the CEO may not be so good for the firm. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96:1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson S. S.Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer A. W. Your good name after you lost it. Across Board (2004) 41:33–38Google Scholar
• Skinner D. J. Why firms voluntarily disclose bad news. J. Accounting Res. (1994) 32:38–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith R., Scannell K. NASD, NYSE agree to merge some oversight. Wall Street J. (2006) 248(November 29):C1Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S. Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. J. Accounting Res. (2005) 43:291–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D., Macy M. W. In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107:147–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman M. A. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20:571–610Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suijs J. Voluntary disclosure of bad news. J. Bus. Finance Accounting (2005) 32:1423–1435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teather D. AIG owns up to 2bn in accounting errors. Bus. Guardian. (2005) . http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1475182,00. htmlGoogle Scholar
• Terlaak A., King A. The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 quality management standard: A signaling approach. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2006) 60:579–602Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troy C., Smith K. G., Gordon L. A. Motivation and opportunity to commit accounting fraud: The role of CEO experience, stock options, and board oversight. (2005) . Working paper, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CAGoogle Scholar
• Tuma N., Hannan M.Social Dynamics Models and Methods (1984) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61:674–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandenbergh M. Beyond elegance: A testable typology of social norms in corporate environmental compliance. Stanford Environ. Law J. (2003) 22:55–144Google Scholar
• Veiga J. F., Golden T. D., Dechant K. Why managers bend company rules. Acad. Management Executive (2004) 18:84–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verrechia R. Essays on disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 32:97–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wade J. B., Porac J. F., Pollock T. G., Graffin S. D. The burden of celebrity: The impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:643–660Crossref, Google Scholar
• Washington M., Zajac E. J. Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:282–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiseman R. M., Gomez-Mejia L. R. A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:133–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Wu M. Earnings restatements: A capital markets perspective. (2002) . Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, KowloonGoogle Scholar
• Zhang X. M., Bartol K. M., Smith K. G., Pfarrer M. D., Khanin D. M. CEOs on the edge: Earnings manipulation and stock-based incentive misalignment. Acad. Management J. (2008) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao B., Olivera F. Error reporting in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31:1012–1030Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G. Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1987) 113:443–464Crossref, Google Scholar