The Asymmetrical Influence of Sex Dissimilarity in Distributive vs. Colocated Work Groups

References

• Ashford S., George E., Blatt R. Old assumptions, new work: The opportunities and challenges of research on nonstandard employment. Ann. Acad. Management (Forthcoming) Google Scholar
• Barsness Z. I., Diekmannm K. A., Seidel M.-D. L. Motivation and opportunity: The role of remote work, demographic dissimilarity, and social network centrality in impression management. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:401–419Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baugh S. G., Graen G. B. Effects of team gender and racial composition on perceptions of team performance in cross-functional teams. Group Organ. Management (1997) 22:366–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell B., Kozlowski S. A typology of virtual teams. Group Organ. Management (2002) 27:14–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhappu A., Griffith T., Northcraft G. Media effects and communication bias in diverse groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 70:199–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhappu A., Zellmer-Bruhn M., Anand V. The effects of demographic diversity and virtual work environments on knowledge processing in teams. Adv. Interdisciplinary Stud. Work Teams (2001) 8:145–161Google Scholar
• Brown R., Condor S., Mathews A., Wade G., Williams J. Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. J. Occupational Psych. (1986) 59:273–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cascio W. Managing a virtual workplace. Acad. Management Executive (2000) 14:81–90Google Scholar
• Chatman J. A., Polzer J. T., Barsade S. G., Neale M. A. Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:749–781Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P. Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:273–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P., George E., Lawrence S. Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement and uncertainty reduction. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89:892–900Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P., Tluchowska M., George E. Identifying the ingroup: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29:180–202Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Culnan M., Markus M., Jablin F., Putnam L., Roberts K., Porter L. Information technologies. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (1987) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 85–121Google Scholar
• De Dreu C. K. W., Weingart L. R. Task versus relationship conflict and team effectiveness: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:741–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Vaus D.Analyzing Social Science Data: 50 Key Problems in Data Analysis (2002) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S., Sethna B. The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human Comput. Interaction (1991) 6:119–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J., Dukerich J., Harquail C. V. Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:239–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T., Neale M. Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Research in Organizational Behavior (2001) 23(JAI, Greenwich, CT) 379–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T., Sawyer J., Neale M. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quart. (2003) 27:265–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R. A normative model of work team effectiveness. (1983) . Technical Report 2, School of Organization and Management, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Heilman M. Affirmative action: Some unintended consequences for working women. Res. Organ. Behav. (1994) 5:269–298Google Scholar
• Heilman M., Alcott V. B. What I think you think of me: Women's reactions to being viewed as beneficiaries of preferential selection. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86:574–582Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman M., Blader S. Assuming preferential selection when the admission policy is unknown: The effect of gender rarity. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86:118–193Google Scholar
• Hinds P., Mortensen M. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:290–302Link, Google Scholar
• Hobman E., Bordia P., Gallois C. Perceived dissimilarity and work group involvement: The moderating effects of group openness to diversity. Group Organ. Management (2004) 29:560–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Hains S. C. Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 70:295–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Terry D. J. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:121–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998) 74:659–671Crossref, Google Scholar
• International Labor Organization Breaking through the glass ceiling: Women in management. (2001) . Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
• Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C.Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S., Leidner D. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S., Knoll K., Leidner D. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. System (1998) 14(4):29–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1994) 5:223–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K., Northcraft G., Neale M. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A., Liao H., Jackson S. Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:459–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabanoff B. Equity, equality, power, and conflict. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16:416–441Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M.Men and Women of the Corporation (1993) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Kline R. B.Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (1991) (Guilford Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Konrad A., Gutek B., Oskamp S., Spacapan S. Theory and research on group composition: Applications to the status of women and ethnic minorities. Interpersonal Processes (1987) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M. Inter-group relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Res. Organ. Behav. (1991) 13:191–228Google Scholar
• Krebs S., Hobman E., Bordia P. Virtual teams and group member dissimilarity: Consequences for the development of trust. Small Group Res. (2006) 37:721–741Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linnehan F., Chrobot-Mason D., Konrad A. Diversity attitudes and norms: The role of ethnic identity and relational demography. J. Organ. Behav. (2006) 27:419–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martins L. L., Gilson L. L., Maynard M. T. What do we know and where do we go from here. J. Management (2004) 30:805–836Google Scholar
• Mullen B., Brown R., Smith C. Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1992) 22:103–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M.Applied Linear Regression Models (1989) (Irwin, Boston)Google Scholar
• Pearce J., Gregersen H. Task interdependence and extra-role behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. J. Appl. Psych. (1991) 76:838–844Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raghuram S., Garud R., Wiesenfeld B., Gupta G. Actors contributing to virtual work adjustment. J. Management (2001) 27:383–405Google Scholar
• Ravlin E. C., Thomas D. C. Status and stratification processes in organizational life. J. Management (2005) 31:966–987Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riordan C., Shore L. M. Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography among work units. J. Appl. Psych. (1997) 82:342–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sachdev I., Bourhis R. Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1991) 21:1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. (1986) 32:1492–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Stephan W., Lindsey G., Aronson E. Intergroup relations. The Handbook of Social Psychology (1985) (Random House, New York) 599–658Google Scholar
• Stewart G., Barrick M. Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:135–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoddard D. B., Donnellon A. Verifone, a Harvard Business School Case Study, 9-398-030. (1997) (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston) Google Scholar
• Tajfel H.Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) Google Scholar
• Tajfel H., Turner J., Worchel S., Austin W. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1986) (Nelson Hall, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Terry D., Callan V. In-group bias in response to organizational merger. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res. Practice (1998) 2:67–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui A., Egan T., O'Reilly C. Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:549–579Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner J.Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (1987) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford) Google Scholar
• Wharton A., Baron J. So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1987) 52:574–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld B., Raghuram S., Garud R. Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:777–790Link, Google Scholar
• Withey M., Cooper W. Predicting exit, voice, loyalty and neglect. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:521–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger T., Lawrence B. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distribution on technical communication. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:353–376Crossref, Google Scholar