An Entrainment-Based Model of Temporal Organizational Fit, Misfit, and Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0330

References

  • Aldrich H. E.Organizations and Environments (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E., Fiol C. M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(4):645–670CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E., Pfeffer J. Environments of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1976) 2:79–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amburgey T. L., Rao H. Organizational ecology: Past, present, and future directions. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(5):1265–1286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D., Chong C., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior (1996) 18(JAI, Greenwich, CT) 251–284Google Scholar
  • Ancona D., Goodman P. S., Lawrence B. S., Tushman M. Time: A new research lens. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(4):645–663CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aschoff J., Krieger D. T. Circadian rhythms: General features and endocrinological aspects. Endocrine Rhythms (1979) (Raven Press, New York) 1–61Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:187–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):238–256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bluedorn A. C. Pilgrim's progress: Trends and convergence in research on organizational size and environments. J. Management (1993) 19:163–191Google Scholar
  • Bluedorn A. C.The Human Organization of Time: Temporal Realities and Experience (2002) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bluedorn A. C., Standifer R. L. Time and the temporal imagination. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. (2006) 5(2):196–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and timepaced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:1–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton R. M., Obel B.Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit (2004) (Kluwer Publishers, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton R. M., DeSanctis G., Obel B.Organizational Design: A Step-by-Step Approach (2006) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton R. M., Lauridsen J., Obel B. Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Sci. (2002) 48(11):1461–1485LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burton R. M., Lauridsen J., Obel B. Erratum: Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Sci. (2003) 49(8):1119LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Child J. Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology (1972) 6:1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J. Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organ. Stud. (1997) 18(1):43–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chong C. Temporal patterns of change in groups. (1995) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Crossan M., Cunha M. P., Vera D., Cunha J. Time and organizational improvisation. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):129–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunha M. P. Organizational time: A dialectical view. Organization (2004) 11(2):271–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das T. K. Time in-management and organizational studies. Time Soc. (1993) 2:267–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D'Aveni R. A.Hyper-Competition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donaldson L.In Defence of Organization Theory: A Reply to Critics (1985) (University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Donaldson L. Strategy and structural adjustment to regain fit and performance: In defence of contingency theory. J. Management Stud. (1987) 24(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donaldson L.For a Positivist Organization Theory (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donaldson L.Performance-Driven Organizational Change: The Organizational Portfolio (1999) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Donaldson L.The Contingency Theory of Organizations (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dooley K. J., Van de Ven A. Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:358–372LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doty D. H., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1196–1250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:543–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Brown S. Time pacing: Competing in markets that won't stand still. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 76(March–April):59–69Google Scholar
  • Fraisse P.The Psychology of Time (1963) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • George J. M., Jones G. The role of time in theory and theory building. J. Management (2000) 26:657–684Google Scholar
  • Gersick C. J. G. Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:9–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gherardi S., Strati A. The temporal dimension of organizational studies. Organ. Stud. (1988) 9:149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ginsberg A., Venkataraman N. Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of the empirical research. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(3):421–434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall E. T.The Dance of Life: The Other Dimension of Time (1983) (Anchor Press, Garden City, NY) Google Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Abrahamson E. Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multimethod approach. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(5):1427–1441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Finkelstein S., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior (1987) 9(JAI, Greenwich, CT) 369–406Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology or organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82:929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49:149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D., Mohammed S., McGrath J. E., Florey A. T., Vanderstoep S. W. Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psych. (2003) 56:633–669CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison M. E., France J. J. Trouble shooting distillation columns, Part 3: Trayed columns. Chemical Engrg. (1989) 96(5):126–133Google Scholar
  • Haveman H. A., Russo M. V., Meyer A. D. Organizational environments in flux: The impact of regulatory punctuations on organizational domains, CEO succession, and performance. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):253–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hrebiniak L. G., Joyce W. F. Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:336–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G., Glick W., Huber G., Glick W. Sources and forms of organizational change. Organizational Change and Redesign (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) 3–15Google Scholar
  • Huy Q. N. Time, temporal capability, and planned change. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(4):601–623CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kay J.Foundations of Corporate Success (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Koka B. R., Madhavan R., Prescott J. E. The evolution of interfirm networks: Environmental effects on patterns of network change. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(3):721–737CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Labianca G., Moon H., Watt I. When is an hour not 60 minutes? Deadlines, temporal schemata, and individual and task group performance. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(4):677–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lang J., Lockhart D. Increased environmental uncertainty and changes in board linkage patterns. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(1):106–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsen E. R., Morecroft J. D. W. Devil's staircase and chaos from macroeconomic mode interaction. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (1993) 17:759–769CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath J. E., Rotchford N. L., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Time and behavior in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1983) 5(JAI, Greenwich, CT) 57–101Google Scholar
  • McGrath J. E., Kelly J. R., Machatka D. E., Oskamp S. The social psychology of time: Entrainment of behavior in social and organizational settings. Applied Social Psychology Annual (1984) 5(Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 21–44Google Scholar
  • McKinley W., Mone M. A., Moon G. Determinants and development of schools in organizational theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24:634–648CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer A. D. Adapting to environmental jolts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27(4):515–537CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miller D. Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Sci. (1991) 37(1):34–52LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. Environmental fit versus internal fit. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):159–178LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Modis T.Conquering Uncertainty: Understanding Corporate Cycles and Positioning Your Company to Survive the Changing Environment (1998) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mosakowski E., Earley P. C. A selective review of time assumptions in strategy research. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:796–812CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naman J. L., Slevin D. P. Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:137–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oatley K., Goodwin B. C., Colquhoun W. P. The explanation and investigation of biological rhythms. Biological Rhythms and Human Performance (1971) (Academic Press, London) 1–38Google Scholar
  • Ofori-Dankwa J., Julian S. D. Complexifying organizational theory: Illustrations using time research. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(3):415–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16:145–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Payne G. T. Examining configurations and firm performance in a suboptimal equifinality context. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(6):756–770LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pittendrigh C. S., Yaker H., Osmond H., Cheek F. On temporal organizations on living systems. The Future of Time (1972) (Anchor Books, Garden City, NY) 179–218Google Scholar
  • Romanelli E., Tushman M. L. Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:1141–1165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R. The adolescence of institutional theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1987) 32:493–511CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short J. C., Ketchen D. J., Bennett N., Du Toit M. An examination of firm, industry, and time effects on performance using random coefficients modeling. Organ. Res. Methods (2006) 9:259–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smircich L., Stubbart C. Strategic management in an enacted world. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10:724–736CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sobel A. H., Plumb R. A. Quantitative diagnostics of mixing in a shallow water model of the stratosphere. J. Atmospheric Sci. (1999) 56(16):2811–2829CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stacey R. E.Complexity and Creativity in Organizations (1996) (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Standifer R. L., Bluedorn A. C. Alliance management teams and entrainment: Sharing temporal mental models. Human Relations (2006) 59:903–927CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stevenson W. B., Pearce J. L., Porter L. W. The concept of “coalition” in organization theory and research. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10:256–268Google Scholar
  • Tang I.-H., Murakami D. M., Fuller C. A. Effects of square-wave and simulated natural light-dark cycles on hamster circadian rhythms. Amer. J. Physiology (1999) 276(4):1195–1202Google Scholar
  • Thomas P. R., Gallace L. J., Martin K. R. Quality alone is not enough. AMA Management Briefing (1992) (AMA Membership Publications Division, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyre M. J., Orlikowski W. J. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:98–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkataraman N., Camillus J. C. Exploring the concept of fit in strategic management. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:513–525Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Whetten D. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):490–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajac E. J., Kraatz M. S., Bresser R. K. F. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:429–453CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L. G. Institutional theories of organization. Annual Rev. Sociology (1987) 13:443–464CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.