Too Risky to Hold? The Effect of Downside Risk, Accumulated Equity Wealth, and Firm Performance on CEO Equity Reduction

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0334

References

  • Aggarwal R. K., Samwick A. A. The other side of the trade-off: The impact of risk on executive compensation. J. Political Econom. (1999) 107(1):65–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A., Mandelker G. N. Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers—The case of anti-takeover charter amendments. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1990) 25(2):143–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amburgey T. L., Miner A. S. Strategic momentum—The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(5):335–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson B. F., Settle J. W. The influence of portfolio characteristics and investment period on investment choice. J. Econom. Psych. (1996) 17(3):343–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Greve H. R. A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):337–349LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Greve H. R. Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(1):83–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barberis N., Huang M. Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. J. Finance (2001) 56(4):1247–1292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y. T. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(4):536–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bawa V. S. Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects. J. Financial Econom. (1975) 2(1):95–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bawa V. S. Safety-1st, stochastic dominance, and optimal portfolio choice. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1978) 13(2):255–271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bawa V. S., Lindenberg E. B. Capital-market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework. J. Financial Econom. (1977) 5(2):189–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beatty R. P., Zajac E. J. Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing—A study of executive-compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(2):313–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benartzi S. Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401(k) accounts to company stock. J. Finance (2001) 56(5):1747–1764CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benartzi S., Thaler R. H. Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Sci. (1999) 45(3):364–381LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bettis J. C., Bizjak J. M., Lemmon M. L. Managerial ownership, incentive contracting, and the use of zero-cost collars and equity swaps by corporate insiders. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2001) 36(3):345–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom M., Milkovich G. T. Relationships among risk, incentive pay, and organizational performance. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(3):283–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman E. H. A risk-return paradox for strategic management. Sloan Management Rev. (1980) Spring):17–31Google Scholar
  • Breen R.Regression Models: Censored, Sample Selected, or Truncated Data (1996) (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk-taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(1):37–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P., Miller K., Rau D., Hitt M. A., Freeman R. E., Harrison J. S. Risk in strategic management research. Handbook of Strategic Management (2001) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) 259–288Google Scholar
  • Chaganti R., Damanpour F. Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(7):479–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee S., Wiseman R. M., Fiegenbaum A., Devers C. E. Integrating behavioural and economic concepts of risk into strategic management: The twain shall meet. Long Range Planning (2003) 26(1):61–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clotfelter C. T., Cook P. J. The gamblers fallacy in lottery play. Management Sci. (1993) 39(12):1521–1525LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coles J. L., Daniel N. D., Naveen L. Managerial incentives and risk-taking. J. Financial Econom. (2006) 79(2):431–468CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coombs C. H., Huang L. Tests of a portfolio theory of risk preference. J. Experiment. Psych. (1970) 85(1):23–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Core J. E., Larcker D. F. Performance consequences of mandatory increases in executive stock ownership. J. Financial Econom. (2002) 64(3):317–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corporate LibraryThe Corporate Library's CEO Pay Survey—CEO Pay 2003 (2004) JulyGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. C.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Daily C. M., Johnson J. L., Ellstrand A. E., Dalton D. R. Compensation committee composition as a determinant of CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(2):209–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David P., Kochhar R., Levitas E. The effect of institutional investors on the level and mix of CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(2):200–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devers C. E., Wiseman R. M., Holmes R. M. The effects of endowment and loss aversion in managerial stock option valuation. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(1):191–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenmann T. R. The effects of CEO equity ownership and firm diversification on risk taking. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(6):513–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiegenbaum A., Thomas H. Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox—Prospect-theory explanations. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(1):85–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S., Hambrick D. C.Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (1996) (West Publishing Company, Minneapolis/St. Paul) Google Scholar
  • Fishburn P. C. Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1977) 67(2):116–126Google Scholar
  • Garvey G. T., Milbourn T. T. Incentive compensation when executives can hedge the market: Evidence of relative performance evaluation in the cross-section. J. Finance (2003) 58(4):1557–1582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garvey G. T., Grant S., King S. P. Myopic corporate behaviour with optimal management incentives. J. Indust. Econom. (1999) 47(2):231–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray S. R., Cannella A. A. The role of risk in executive compensation. J. Management (1997) 23(4):517–540Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(1):58–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grootveld H., Hallerback W. Variance vs. downside risk: Is there really that much difference? Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1999) 114(2):304–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guay W. R. The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk: An analysis of the magnitude and determinants. J. Financial Econom. (1999) 53(1):43–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B. J., Liebman J. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113(3):653–691CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris J., Bromiley P. Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):350–367LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Murphy K. J. Performance pay and top management incentives. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(2):225–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Murphy K. J., Wruck E. G. Remuneration: Where we've been, how we got to here, what are the problems, and how to fix them. (2004) . Harvard NOM Working Paper 04-28, ECGI—Finance Working Paper 44/2004, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Jin L. CEO compensation, diversification, and incentives. J. Financial Econom. (2002) 66(1):29–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Lovallo D. Timid choices and bold forecasts—A cognitive perspective on risk-taking. Management Sci. (1993) 39(1):17–31LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory—Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Amer. Psych. (1984) 39(4):341–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econom. Perspect. (1991) 5(1):193–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Wakker P. P., Sarin R. Back to Bentham?—Explorations of experienced utility. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(2):375–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehner J. M. Shifts of reference points for framing of strategic decisions and changing risk-return associations. Management Sci. (2000) 46(1):63–76LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D., March J. G. A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1981) 2(4):307–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Libby R., Fishburn P. C. Behavioral models of risk taking in business decisions: A survey and evaluation. J. Accounting Res. (1977) 15(2):272–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luce R. D., Weber E. U. An axiomatic theory of conjoint, expected risk. J. Math. Psych. (1986) 30:188–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Shapira Z. Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. (1992) 99(1):172–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markowitz H. M. Portfolio selection. J. Finance (1952) 7(1):77–91Google Scholar
  • Markowitz H. M.Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments (1959) (Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar
  • Markowitz H. M. Foundations of portfolio theory. (1990) . Nobel Prize Lecture. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1990/markowitz-lecture.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Meulbroek L. The efficiency of equity-linked compensation: Understanding the full cost of awarding executive stock options. Financial Management (2000) 30(2):5–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. Stale in the saddle—CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Sci. (1991) 37(1):34–52LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller J. S., Wiseman R. M., Gomez-Mejia L. R. The fit between CEO compensation design and firm risk. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(4):745–756CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller K. D., Bromiley P. Strategic risk and corporate performance—An analysis of alternative risk measures. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(4):756–779CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller K. D., Reuer J. J. Measuring organizational downside risk. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(9):671–691CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller K. D., Shapira Z. An empirical test of heuristics and biases affecting real option valuation. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(3):269–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy K. J., Card D. Executive compensation. Handbook of Labor Economics (1999) (New Holland, Amsterdam) 2485–2563CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ofek E., Yermack D. Taking stock: Equity-based compensation and the evolution of managerial ownership. J. Finance (2000) 55(3):1367–1384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rom B. M., Ferguson K. W. Post-modern portfolio theory comes of age. J. Investing (1994) Fall):11–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy A. D. Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica (1952) 20(3):431–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruefli T. W., Collins J. M., Lacugna J. R. Risk measures in strategic management research: Auld lang syne? Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(2):167–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanders W. G. Behavioral responses of CEOs to stock ownership and stock option pay. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(3):477–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shefrin H. M., Statman M. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. J. Finance (1985) 40(3):777–792CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1980) 1:39–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decision Making (1999) 12(3):183–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R., Johnson E. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcome on risky choice. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):643–660LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. H., Tversky A., Kahneman D., Schwartz A. The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(2):647–661CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tobin J. Estimation for relationships with limited dependent variables. Econometrica (1958) 26(1):24–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84(4):327–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Belief in law of small numbers. Psych. Bull. (1971) 76(2):105–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty—Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185(4157):1124–1131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science (1981) 211(4481):453–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. (1986) 59(4):S251–S278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Koehler D. J. Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psych. Rev. (1994) 101(4):547–567CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Slovic P., Kahneman D. The causes of preference reversal. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(1):204–217Google Scholar
  • Wiseman R. M., Bromiley P. Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance, and decline. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):524–543LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wiseman R. M., Gomez-Mejia L. R. A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(1):133–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright P., Ferris S. P., Sarin A., Awasthi V. Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(2):441–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajac E. J., Westphal J. D. Accounting for the explanations of CEO compensation—Substance and symbolism. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):283–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.