Constrained Growth: How Experience, Legitimacy, and Age Influence Risk Taking in Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0335

References

  • Argote L. Organizational learning curves: Persistence, transfer and turnover. Internat. J. Tech. Management (1996) 11(7–8):759–769Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):140–154LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Greve H. R. Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52:83–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Locke E. A., Smith K. G. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(5):837–853CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal P., Clelland I. J. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:93–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barron D. N., West E., Hannan M. T. A time to grow and a time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City, 1914–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. (1995) 100:381–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Dahlin K. Aspiration performance and railroads' patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:368–385LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):996–1016LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baumard P., Starbuck W. H. Learning from failures: Why it may not happen. Long Range Planning (2005) 38(3):281–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boeker W., Goodstein J. Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:805–826CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyer K. D. The costs of price regulation: Lessons from railroad deregulation. RAND J. Econom. (1987) 18:408–416CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:37–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Darr E. D., Argote L., Epple D. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. (1995) 41(11):1750–1762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Holan P. M., Phillips N. Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1603–1613LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse D. L. Does isomorphism legitimate? Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):1024–1039CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse D. L. To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Stategic Management J. (1999) 20(2):147–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse D. L., Carter S. M. An examination of the differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. J. Management Stud. (2005) 42(2):329–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited—Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drury G. H.The Historical Guide to North American Railroads (2000) (Kalmback Publishing, Waukesha, WI) Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(1):58–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Sticky aspirations: Organizational time perspective and competitiveness. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:1–17LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding. Indust. Corporate Change (2003a) 12:1051–1076CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R.Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (2003b) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T. Rethinking age dependence in organizational mortality: Logical formalizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1998) 104(1):126–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational-change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49(2):149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris J., Bromiley P. Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:350–367LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R., Rhee M. The role of volition in organizational learning: The case of automotive product recalls. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1545–1560LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R., Sullivan B. Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines' learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(4):609–643CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47:153–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson J., Cool K. Corporate governance, investment bandwagons and overcapacity: An analysis of the worldwide petrochemical industry, 1975–95. Stategic Management J. (2003a) 24(4):349–373Google Scholar
  • Henderson J., Cool K. Learning to time capacity expansions: An empirical analysis of the worldwide petrochemical industry, 1975–95. Stategic Management J. (2003b) 24(5):393–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hicks J. P. Notes on the new year of industry; cost-cutting railroads. New York Times (1986) January 5):3–4Google Scholar
  • Ketchen D. J., Palmer T. B. Strategic responses to poor organizational performance: A test of competing perspectives. J. Management (1999) 25:683–706CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Hurley A. E. A contingency model of response to performance feedback—Escalation of commitment and incremental adaptation in resource investment decisions. Group Organ. Management (1999) 24(4):421–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Batra B. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Stategic Management J. (1992) 13:585–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin D. Z. Organizational learning and the transfer of knowledge: An investigation of quality improvement. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):630–647LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual R. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk-taking. Management Sci. (1987) 33(11):1404–1418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Shapira Z. Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. (1992) 99(1):172–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations—Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83(2):340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Chen M. J. Sources and consequences of competitive inertia—A study of the United States airline industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(1):1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller K. D., Chen W. Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira model. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:105–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milligan B. Ocean ports expand, but worry about service. Purchasing (2000) 128(9):77–78Google Scholar
  • Milliken F. J., Lant T. K. The effect of an organization's recent performance history on strategic persistence and change: The role of managerial interpretations. Adv. Strategic Management (1991) 7:129–156Google Scholar
  • Mone M. A., McKinley W., Barker V. L. Organizational decline and innovation: A contingency framework. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:115–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nystrom P. C., Starbuck W. H. To avoid organizational crisis, unlearn. Organ. Dynam. (1984) 12(4):53–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W. The enactment of economic adversity: A reconciliation of theories of failure-induced change and threat rigidity. Res. Organ. Behav. (1995) 17:287–331Google Scholar
  • Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Stategic Management J. (1997) 18:187–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):145–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer T. B., Wiseman R. M. Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Stategic Management J. (1999) 20:1037–1062CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park K. M. Antecedents of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning: The effects of performance and aspiration on the direction of strategic change. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:386–402LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pollock T. G., Rindova V. P. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(5):631–642CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Railroad Ten-Year Trends (1984) 1Economics and Finance Department, Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Ranger-Moore J. Bigger may be better, but is older wiser? Organizational age and size in the New York life insurance industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1997) 62(6):903–920CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Stategic Management J. (1994) 15:29–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts P. W., Dowling G. R. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Stategic Management J. (2002) 23(12):1077–1093CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruef M. Assessing organizational fitness on a dynamic landscape: An empirical test of the relative inertia thesis. Stategic Management J. (1997) 18(11):837–853Google Scholar
  • Ruef M., Scott W. R. A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:877–904CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz M. Limits to bureucratic growth: The density dependence of organizational rule births. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:845–876CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Shimizu K., Hitt M. A. What constrains or facilitates divestitures of formerly acquired firms? The effects of organizational inertia. J. Management (2005) 31(1):50–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. V. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29:562–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siomkos G., Shrivastava P. Responding to product liability crises. Long Range Planning (1993) 26(5):72–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin S. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Res. Organ. Behav. (1992) 14:231–266Google Scholar
  • Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. Environmental variation, strategic change and firm performance—A study of railroad deregulation. Stategic Management J. (1987) 8(4):363–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O. Interdependence and adaptability: Organizational learning and the long-term effect of integration. Management Sci. (2003) 49:446–463LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H., Hedberg B. L., Thorelli H. Saving an organization from stagnating environments. Strategy+Structure=Performance (1978) (University Press, Bloomington, IN) 249–259Google Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Sandelands L. E., Dutton J. E. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational-behavior—A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(4):501–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suchman M. C. Managing legitimacy—Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):571–610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornhill S., Amit R. Learning about failure: Bankruptcy, firm age, and the resource-based view. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(5):497–509LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Transportation Statistics Annual Report (1994–2004) . U.S. Dept of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Watson R. 60 rail inspectors blitz UP to check safety procedures. J. Commerce (1997) 413:13Google Scholar
  • Weber R. P.Basic Content Analysis (1990) 2nd ed.(Sage, Newbury Park, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wezel F. C., Saka-Helmhout A. Antecedents and consequences of organizational change: “Institutionalizing” the behavioral theory of the firm. Organ. Stud. (2006) 27(2):265–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiseman R. M., Bromiley P. Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance and decline. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:524–543LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zellmer-Bruhn M. E. Interruptive events and team knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. (2003) 49:514–528LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman M. A., Zeitz G. J. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27:414–431CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.