Dealing with the Paradox of Embeddedness: The Role of Contracts and Trust in Facilitating Movement Out of Committed Relationships

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0336

References

  • Abreu D. On the theory of infinitely repeated games with discounting. Econometrica (1988) 56:383–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Afuah A. How much do your co-competitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:387–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Akerlof G. The market for “lemons”: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84:488–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof G. Labor contracts as a partial gift exchange. Quart. J. Econom. (1982) 97:543–569CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D.Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data (1984) (Sage, Newbury Park) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S., Bercovitz J., Mayer K. J. Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: An empirical study of IT service contracts. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:3–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R.The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. Quart. J. Econom. (1994) 109:1125–1156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W. E., Faulkner R. R., Fisher G. A. Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1998) 63:147–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bercovitz J., Jap S. D., Nickerson J. A. The antecedents and performance implications of cooperative exchange norms. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:724–740LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P.Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Blumberg B. F. Cooperation and contracts between embedded firms. Organ. Stud. (2001) 22:825–852CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown M., Falk A., Fehr E. Contractual incompleteness and the nature of market interactions. (2002) . Working paper series, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler J. S., Moffitt R. A computationally efficient quadrature procedure for the one-factor multinomial probit model. Econometrica (1982) 50:761–764CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chamberlain G. Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1980) 47:225–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G., Frechette G. R., Kagel J. H. How robust is laboratory gift exchange? Experimental Econom. (2004) 7:189–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y. Promises, trust, and contracts. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (2000) 16:209–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook K. S., Emerson R. M. Power, equity, and commitment in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1978) 43:721–739CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deci E. L., Ryan R. M.Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (1985) (Plenum, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J. Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:227–243LinkGoogle Scholar
  • De Soto H.The Other Path: The Economic Answer to Terrorism (2002) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:660–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eccles R. G. The quasifirm in the construction industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1981) 2:335–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eccles R. G., Crane D. B.Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work (1988) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ellickson R. C.Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (1991) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E., Gächter S. Do incentive contracts crowd out voluntary cooperation? (2000) . Working paper, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E., Gächter S., Kirchsteiger G. Reciprocity as a contract enforcement device: Experimental evidence. Econometrica (1997) 64:833–860CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank R. H.Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of Emotions (1988) (W. W. Norton & Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Frey B. S. A constitution for knaves crowds out civic virtues. Econom. J. (1997) 107:1043–1053Google Scholar
  • Friedman M.Capitalism and Freedom (1962) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Glaeser E. L., Laibson D. I., Scheinkman J. A., Soutter C. L. Measuring trust. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115:811–846CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greif A., Drobak J. N., Nye J. V. C. On the interrelations and economic implications of economic, social, political, and normative factors: Reflection from two late medieval societies. The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics (1997) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 57–94Google Scholar
  • Greif A., Milgrom P., Weingast B. R. Coordination, commitment, and enforcement: The case of the merchant guild. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102:745–776CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:85–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardin R., Cook K. Conceptions and explanations of trust. Trust in Society (2001) (Russell Sage, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hayek F. A. The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1945) 35:519–530Google Scholar
  • Helper S. Strategy and irreversibility in supplier relations: The case of the U.S. automobile industry. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1991) 65:781–824CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holt C. A., Kagel J. H., Roth A. E. Industrial organization: A survey of laboratory research. Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 350–443Google Scholar
  • Huff L., Kelley L. Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven-nation study. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:81–90LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson S., McMillan J., Woodruff C. Courts and relational contracts. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (2002) 18:221–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C., Hesterly W. S., Borgatti S. P. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22:911–945CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B. Why hold-ups occur: The self-enforcing range of contractual relationships. Econom. Inquiry (1996) 34:444–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B., Leffler K. B. The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89:615–641CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B., Crawford R. A., Alchian A. Vertical integration, appopriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. (1978) 21:297–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kollock P. The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Amer. J. Sociol. (1994) 2:313–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kranton R. E., Minehart D. F. Networks versus vertical integration. RAND J. Econom. (2000) 31:570–601CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazzarini S. G., Zenger T. R. The strength of churning ties: A dynamic theory of interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Conf. (2002) Denver, COGoogle Scholar
  • Lazzarini S. G., Miller G. J., Zenger T. R. Order with some law: Complementarity vs. substitution of formal and informal arrangements. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (2004) 20:261–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lubell M., Scholz J. T. Cooperation, reciprocity, and the collective-action heuristic. Amer. J. Political Sci. (2001) 45:160–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macaulay S. Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1963) 28:55–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macneil I. R. Contracts: Adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. (1978) 72:854–905Google Scholar
  • Malhotra D., Murnighan J. K. The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:534–559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J.Economics, Organization and Management (1992) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P., North D. C., Weingast B. R. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Econom. Politics (1990) 2:1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • North D. C.Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pauly M. The economics of moral hazard. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1968) 58:31–58Google Scholar
  • Piore M. J., Sabel C. F.The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Page K. L. Network forms of organization. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1998) 24:57–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L., Zenger T. R. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:707–726CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Portes A., Sensenberger J. Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98:1320–1350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putnam R. D.Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (1993) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19:90–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson T. S., Gatignon H. Technology development mode: A transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:515–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosett A.Contract Law and Its Application (1994) (The Foundation Press, Westbury, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rowley T., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:369–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seabright M. A., Levinthal D. A., Fichman M. Role of individual attachments in the dissolution of interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:122–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro D. L., Sheppard B. H., Cheraskin L. Business on a handshake. Negotiation J. (1992) 8:365–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh K., Mitchell W. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:99–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Roth N. L. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:367–394LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan R., Brush T. H. Supplier performance in vertical alliances: The effects of self-enforcing agreements and enforceable contracts. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:436–452LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Strickland L. H. The effects of surveillance on trust. J. Personality (1958) 26:200–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor M.The Possibility of Cooperation (1987) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Telser L. G. A theory of self-enforcing agreements. J. Bus. (1980) 53:27–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tenbrunsel A. E., Messick D. M. Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:684–707CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thibaut J. W., Kelley H. H.The Social Psychology of Groups (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tirole J. Incomplete contracts: Where do we stand? Econometrica (1999) 67:741–781CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. J. Law Econom. (1993) 36:453–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Mechanisms of Governance (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yamagishi T., Yamagishi M. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion (1994) 18:129–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yamagishi T., Cook K. S., Watabe M. Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. Amer. J. Sociol. (1998) 104:165–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zak P. J., Knack S. Trust and growth. Econom. J. (2001) 111:295–321Google Scholar
  • Zucker L. G. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Res. Organ. Behav. (1986) 8:53–111Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.