Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis

References

• Adner R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84:98–110Google Scholar
• Ahmadjian C. L., Okumura A., Mallin C. A. Corporate governance in Japan. Handbook on International Corporate Governance (2006) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G., Katila R. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:197–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J., Gittelman M. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influcence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88:774–779Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M.The Social Psychology of Creativity (1983) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1988) Vol. 10(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 123–167Google Scholar
• Armour H. O., Teece D. J. Vertical integration and technological innovation. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1980) 62:470–474Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M., Frese M. Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behavior (2003) 24:45–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuck L. A., Roe M. J. A theory of path dependence in corporate ownership and governance. Stanford Law Rev. (1999) 52:127–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell G. G., Zaheer A. Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):955–972Link, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:676–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boden M.The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2003) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Chan D. Functional relations among constraints in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of compositional models. J. Applied Psych. (1998) 83:234–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Coffee J. C. The future as history: The prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. (1999) 93:641–707Google Scholar
• Cowan R., Jonard N. The dynamics of collective invention. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2003) 52:513–532Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan R., Jonard N. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2004) 28:1557–1575Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Acad. Management J. (1978) 21:193–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H.Process Innovation (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Drucker P.Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2006) (Collins, New York) Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:350–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C., Bohmer R., Pisano G. P. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology adaptation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:685–716Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., King C., Juda A. I. Small worlds and regional innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):938–954Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Waguespack D. M. Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):165–184Link, Google Scholar
• Frambach R. T., Barkema H. G. Adoption of a service innovation in the business market: An empirical test of supply-side variables. J. Bus. Res. (1998) 41:161–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J. L., Porter M. E., Stern S. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy (2002) 31:899–933Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner H.Creating Minds: An Anatomy of Creativity Seen Through the Lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi (1994) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Getzels J. W., Jackson P. W.Creativity and Intelligence (1962) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S.Missing Organizational Linkages (2000) (Sage Publications, Inc., London) Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper echelons—The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):193–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A.How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Hess D., Rothaermel F. Promising research directions for research on organizational innovation. Organ. Sci. Winter Conf. (2007) February 8–11Steamboat Springs, COGoogle Scholar
• Howell J. M., Boies K. Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. Leadership Quart. (2004) 15:123–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isen A. M., Daubman K. A., Nowicki G. P. Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 52:1122–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108:577–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:1183–1194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirton M. J.Personality and Individual Differences (1996) (Elsevier Science, New York) Google Scholar
• Kitschelt H. Industrial governance structures, innovation strategies, and the case of Japan: Sectoral or cross-national comparative analysis? Internat. Organ. (1991) 45:453–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein K. J., Sorra J. S. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:1055–1080Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein K. J., Dansereau F., Hall R. J. Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19:195–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S. Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86:562–583Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S. W. J., Klein K. J., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 3–90Google Scholar
• Lee F., Edmondson A. C., Thomke S., Worline M. The mixed effects of inconsistency on experimentation in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:310–326Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt T.Innovation in Marketing: New Perspectives for Profit and Growth (1962) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Lieberman M. B., Montgomery D. B. First-mover advantage. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:41–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Miron E., Erez M., Naveh E. Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? J. Organ. Behav. (2004) 25:175–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson F. P., Hofmann D. A. The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24:249–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F., O'Mahony S. Perspective—Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: Implications for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):1006–1021Link, Google Scholar
• Oldham G. R., Cummings A. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:607–634Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82:74–82Google Scholar
• Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith J. E. Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:85–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P., Singh H., Zollo M. Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:263–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quigley N., Tesluk P. E., Bartol K. M., Locke E. A. A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:71–88Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Organ. Sci. (2003) 48:240–267Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F., Hess A. M. Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):898–921Link, Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M., Cummings L. L., Staw B. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior (1985) Vol. 7(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–38Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. P., Lamb R. B. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 556–570Google Scholar
• Saxenian A.Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (1996) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J.Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1942) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Scott S. G., Bruce R. A. Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:580–607Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior (1947) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Solow R. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1957) 39:312–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somaya D., Williamson I. O., Zhang X. Combining patent law expertise with R&D for patenting performance. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):922–937Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor A., Greve H. R. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:723–740Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation. Res. Policy (1986) 15:285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen G. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tschang F. Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):989–1005Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P.Managing Strategic Innovation and Change: A Collection of Readings (2004) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Moore W. L.Readings in the Management of Innovation (1982) (Pitman, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Utterback J. The process of technological innovation within the firm. Acad. Management J. (1971) 14:75–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Sci. (1986) 32:590–607Link, Google Scholar
• Van Dyck C., Frese M., Baer M., Sonnentag S. Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. J. Appl. Psych. (2005) 90:1228–1240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wade J. Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:111–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105:493–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D., Strogatz S. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature (1998) 393:440–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• West M. A. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Appl. Psych. Internat. Rev. (2002) 51:355–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• West M. A., Anderson N. R. Innovation in top management teams. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81:680–693Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa T., Tsui-Auch L. S., McGuire J. Corporate governance reform as institutional innovation: The case of Japan. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):973–988Link, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., Bell G. Geography, networks and knowledge flow. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:955–972Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:339–351Link, Google Scholar