Alliance Portfolio Internationalization and Firm Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0341

References

  • Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000a) 45(3):425–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management J. (2000b) 21:317–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand B. N., Khanna T. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:295–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E., Gatignon H. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1986) 17(3):1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):150–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkema H. G., Vermeulen F. What differences in the cultural background of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures? J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1997) 28(4):845–864CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkema H., Bell J., Pennings J. Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:151–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkema H., Shenkar O., Vermeulen F., Bell J. Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:426–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):996–1016LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Calabrese T., Silverman B. S. Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:267–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K. A., Jackman R. W. Economic and non-economic determinants of political democracy in the 1960s. Res. Political Sociol. (1985) 1:27–48Google Scholar
  • Brush T. H., Bromiley P., Hendrickx M. The free cash flow hypothesis for sales growth and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(4):455–472CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buckley P. J., Casson M.The Economic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise (1976) (Macmillan, London) Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Contractor F. J., Lorange P.Cooperative Strategies in International Business (1988) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Contractor F., Kundu S., Hsu C.-C. A three-stage theory of international expansion: The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2003) 34:5–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R., March J.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) 2nd ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Das T. K., Teng B.-S. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):491–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das S., Sen P. K., Sengupta S. Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(1):27–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):345–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategies and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eden L., Miller S. Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Adv. Internat. Management (2004) 16:187–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):136–150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eriksson K., Johanson J., Majkgard A., Sharma D. Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1997) 28:337–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erramilli K. Nationality and subsidiary ownership patterns in multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1996) 27:225–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gertler M. Best practice? Geography, learning and the institutional limits to strong convergence. J. Econom. Geography (2001) 1:5–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P. Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(8):137–147Google Scholar
  • Goerzen A., Beamish P. W. The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:333–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grinblatt M., Keloharju M. How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. J. Finance (2001) 17(3):769–809Google Scholar
  • Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choices. Acad. Management J. (1995) 35(4):85–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(4):293–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(5):397–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Higgins M. C. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(2):127–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Singh H. The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(4):781–814CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagedoorn J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(5):371–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haggard S.Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrialized Countries (1990) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Hamel G. Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:83–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrigan K. R. Joint ventures and competitive strategy. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:361–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica (1978) 46:1251–1271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47:153–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henisz W. J. The institutional environment for economic growth. Econom. Politics (2000) 12(1):1–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt M. A., Hoskisson R. E., Kim H. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:767–798CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G.Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Value (1980) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hymer S. H.The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment (1976) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Inkpen A. C., Beamish P. W. Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(1):177–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic location of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(3):577–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen R., Szulanski G. Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2004) 35(6):508–523CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johanson J., Vahlne J.-E. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1977) 8:23–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P., Dyer J. H., Singh H. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(8):747–767CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P., Singh H., Perlmutter H. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):217–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalmbach C. J., Roussel C. Dispelling the myths of alliances. Outlook (1999) 5–32Google Scholar
  • Kanungo R. N., Jaeger A. M., Jaeger A. M., Kanungo R. N. Chapter 1: Introduction. Management in Developing Countries (1990) (Routledge, London) 1–19Google Scholar
  • Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. Governance matters V: Aggregate and individual governance indicators for 1996–2005. (2006) (World Bank, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Khanna T., Gulati R., Nohria N. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(3):193–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinbaum D. G., Lawrence L. K., Muller K. E., Nizam A.Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods (1998) 3rd ed.(Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
  • Kogut B., Kulatilaka N. Operating flexibility, global manufacturing, and the option value of a multinational network. Management Sci. (1993) 39(11):123–139Google Scholar
  • Kogut B., Singh H. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1988) 19(3):411–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kostova T. Country institutional profiles: Concept and measurement. Best Paper Proc. Acad. Management Annual Meeting (1997) 180–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kostova T., Zaheer S. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24:64–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar R., Nti K. O. Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: A process and outcome discrepancy model. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):356–367LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kurokawa S., Iwata S., Roberts E. B. Global R&D activities of Japanese MNCs in the U.S.: A triangulation approach. Res. Policy (2007) 36:3–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane H. W., Beamish P. W. Cross-cultural cooperative behavior in joint ventures in LDCs. Management Internat. Rev. (1990) 30:87–102Google Scholar
  • Lane P. J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(5):461–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane P. J., Salk J. E., Lyles M. A. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:1139–1161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(3):638–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(12):1187–1212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D., Rosenkopf L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(6):797–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G., Scott W. R., Short J. F. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociology (1988) (Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA) 319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lorenzoni G., Lipparini A. The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:317–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loughran T., Ritter J. R. Why has IPO underwriting changed over time? Financial Management (2004) 33(3):5–37Google Scholar
  • Lu J. W., Beamish P. W. International diversification and firm performance: The s-curve hypothesis. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):598–609CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu J., Beamish P. W. Partnering strategies and performance of SMEs' international joint ventures. J. Bus. Venturing (2006) 21:461–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maddala G. S.Introduction to Econometrics (2001) 3rd ed.(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Makino S., Beamish P. W. Performance and survival of joint ventures with non-conventional ownership structures. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1998) 29:797–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin X., Salomon R. Tacitness, learning, and international expansion: A study of foreign direct investment in a knowledge-intensive industry. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:297–311LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Monteverde K., Teece D. Appropriable rents and quasi-vertical integration. J. Law Econom. (1982) 321–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Novick L. R. Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. J. Experiment. Psych., Learn., Memory, Cognition (1988) 14:510–520CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Grady S., Lane H. W. The psychic distance paradox. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1996) 27(2):309–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osborn R. N., Baughn C. Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33:503–519CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkhe A. Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1991) 22(4):579–601CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennings J., Barkema H., Douma S. Organizational learning and diversification. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:608–640CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phene A., Fladmoe-Lindquist K., Marsh L. Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27:369–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M. E. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68(2):73–91Google Scholar
  • Pothukuchi V., Damanpour F., Choi J., Chen C. C., Park S. H. National and organizational culture differences and international joint venture performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2002) 33(2):243–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behav. (1990) 12:295–336Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):116–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reuer J. J., Leiblein M. J. Downside risk implications of multinationality and international joint ventures. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:201–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothaermel F. T. Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:687–699CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:369–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rudy J. Standard & Poor's Industry Surveys—Computers: Software. (2000) 1–38Google Scholar
  • Sampson R. C. Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:1009–1031CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S. Why do some societies invest more than others? J. Bus. Venturing (1992) 7(1):29–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver M. J. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. (1998) 44(4):571–585LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shenkar O. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2001) 32:519–535CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shenkar O., Li J. T. Knowledge search in international cooperative ventures. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(2):134–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simonin B. L. The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(5):1150–1174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonin B. L. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:595–623CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steensma H. K., Lyles M. A. Explaining IJV survival in a transitional economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:831–851CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steensma H. K., Tihanyi L., Lyles M. A., Dhanaraj C. The evolving value of foreign partnerships in transitioning economies. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(2):213–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(8):791–811CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:315–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):9–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tallman S., Li J. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(1):179–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. Competition, cooperation, and innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1992) 18:1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas D., Eden L. What is the shape of the multinationality-performance relationship? Multinational Bus. Rev. (2004) 12:89–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tihanyi L., Griffith D. A., Russell C. J. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2005) 36(3):270–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61:674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:269–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woodcock C. P., Beamish P. W., Makino S. Ownership-based entry mode strategies and international performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1994) 2:253–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu D., Shenkar O. Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(4):608–618CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yan A., Gray B. Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States–Chinese joint ventures: A comparative case study. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(6):1478–1517CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yan A. M., Zeng M. International joint venture instability: A critique of previous research, a reconceptualization, and directions for future research. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1999) 30(2):397–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer S. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:341–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer S., Earley P. C., Singh H. Time zone economics and managerial work in a global world. Innovations in International and Cross-Cultural Management (2000) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 339–353CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):185–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Reuer J. J., Singh H. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(6):701–713LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.