Institutional Logics or Agency Costs: The Influence of Corporate Governance Models on Business Group Restructuring in Emerging Economies

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0342

References

  • Ahmadjian C. L., Robbins G. E. A clash of capitalisms: Foreign shareholders and corporate restructuring in 1990s Japan. Amer. Soc. Rev. (2005) 70:451–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson R. C., Reeb D. M. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. J. Finance (2003) 58:1301–1327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Backman M.Asia Eclipse: Exposing the Dark Side of Business in Asia (1999) (Wiley, Singapore) Google Scholar
  • Berger P. L., Luckmann T.The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (1966) (Anchor Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Berry C. H.Corporate Growth and Diversification (1975) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bertrand M., Mehta P., Mullainathan S. Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):121–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman E. H., Singh H. Corporate restructuring: Reconfiguring the firm. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(4):5–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S. J. An evolutionary perspective on diversification and corporate restructuring: Entry, exit, and economic performance during 1981–89. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(8):587–611CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S. J. Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:238–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S. J., Hong J. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:429–448CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S. J., Chung C., Mahmood I. P. When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:637–656LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chu Y.-P., Mai C.-C., Shih C.-S. Liberalization policies since the 1980s. Taiwan's Economic Success Since 1980 (2001) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) 89–119Google Scholar
  • Claessens S., Djankov S., Lang L. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. J. Financial Econom. (2000) 52:81–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Claessens S., Djankov S., Fan J., Lang L. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. J. Finance (2002) 57(6):2741–2771CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemens E. S., Cook J. M. Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1999) 25:441–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Council for Economic Planning and DevelopmentTaiwan Statistical Data Book (2000) (Taipei, Republic of China)Google Scholar
  • Davis G. F., Diekmann K. A., Tinsley C. H. The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1994) 59(4):547–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faccio M., Lang L., Young L. Dividends and expropriation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91:54–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama E. F., Jensen M. C. Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. (1983) 26:301–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Filatotchev I., Wright M., Uhlenbruck K., Tihanyi L., Hoskisson R. E. Governance, organizational capabilities, and restructuring in transition economies. J. World Bus. (2003) 38(4):331–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss P., Zajac E. The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:501–534Google Scholar
  • Fligstein N.The Transformation of Corporate Control (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fligstein N., Brantley P. Bank control, owner control, or organizational dynamics: Who controls the large modern corporation? Amer. J. Sociol. (1992) 98(2):280–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fraser InstituteEconomic Freedom of the World (1997) (The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia) Google Scholar
  • Friedland R., Alford R. R., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Bring society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 232–263Google Scholar
  • Fukuyama F. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. (1995) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ghemawat P., Khanna T. The nature of diversified business groups: A research design and two case studies. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46:35–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbs P. A. Determinants of corporate restructuring: The relative importance of corporate governance, takeover threat, and free cash flow. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(4):51–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Coase revisited: Business groups in the modern economy. Indust. Corporate Change (1995) 4:93–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W.Econometric Analysis (1993) 2nd ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(4):1022–1054CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guillén M. F.The Limits of Convergence: Globalization and Organizational Change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain (2001) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hall P. A., Soskice D., Hall P. A., Soskice D. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (2001) (Oxford University Press, New York) 1–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton G. G., Biggart N. W. Market, culture, and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the Far East. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94:S52–S94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton G. G., Kao C. S., Calhoun C. The institutional foundation of Chinese business: The family firm in Taiwan. Comparative Social Research (1990) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 135–151Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Soc. (1977) 82(5):929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobday M. East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics. World Development (1995) 23:1171–1193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoskisson R. E., Cannella A. A., Tihanyl L., Faraci R. Asset restructuring and business group affiliation in French civil law countries. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(6):525–539CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoskisson R. E., Johnson R. A., Tihanyi L., White R. E. Diversified business groups and corporate refocusing in emerging economies. J. Management (2005) 31(6):941–965CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsiao H.-H. M. The political economy of state-business relations in Taiwan. Acta Oeconomica (1993) 45:145–172Google Scholar
  • Hsu Y.-H.Tsou Kuo Pa Shih Sui Yueh [Passing Through Eighty Years] (1994) (Hsun-Tung Hsu, Taipei, Taiwan) Google Scholar
  • Ingram P., Silverman B. S. The new institutionalism in strategic management. Adv. Strategic Management (2002) 19:1–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:323–329Google Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:305–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jepperson R. L., Meyer J., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. The public order and the construction of formal organizations. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 204–231Google Scholar
  • Journalist The evolution of enterprises in the past ten years [in Chinese]. (1996) October 6Google Scholar
  • Khanna T., Palepu K., Morck R. Emerging market business groups, foreign intermediaries, and corporate governance. Concentrated Corporate Ownership (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 265–293Google Scholar
  • Khanna T., Rivkin J. W. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:45–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T., Rivkin J. W. Interorganizational ties and business group boundaries: Evidence from an emerging economy. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:333–352LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T., Yafeh Y. Business groups and risk sharing around the world. J. Bus. (2005) 78:301–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim H., Hoskisson R. E., Tihanyi L., Hong J. Evolution and restructuring of diversified business groups in emerging markets: The lessons from chaebols in Korea. Asia Pacific J. Management (2004) 21:25–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Corporate ownership around the world. J. Finance (1999) 54:471–517CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luo X., Chung C. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:404–439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyles M. A., Salk J. E. Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical examination in the Hungarian context. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1996) 27(5):877–903CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCullagh P., Nelder J. A.Generalized Linear Models (1983) (Chapman and Hall, London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Soc. (1977) 83:340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pack H. The role of acquisition of foreign technology in Taiwanese growth. Indust. Corporate Change (2001) 10:713–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palepu K. Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6:239–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D., Barber B. M. Challengers, elites, and owning families: A social class theory of corporate acquisitions in the 1960s. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:87–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D. A., Jennings P. D., Zhou X. Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:100–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D., Friedland R., Jennings P. D., Powers M. E. The economics and politics of structure: The multidivisional form and the large U.S. corporation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1987) 32:25–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng M. W. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:275–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sachs J. D., Warner A. M. Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1995) 25th anniversary issue):1–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanders W. G., Tuschke A. C. The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50:33–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Seo M. G., Creed W. E. D. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):222–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma P., Manikutty S. Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2005) 29(3):293–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirmon D. G., Hitt M. A. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2003) 27(4):339–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taiwan Stock Exchange Research on the management of foreign investment by our country's security market and reflection on qualification of foreign institutional investors [in Chinese]. (2001) (Taiwan Stock Exchange, Taipei) Google Scholar
  • Thornton P. Personal versus market logics of control: A historically contingent theory of the risk of acquisition. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:294–311LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thornton P., Ocasio W., Greewood R., Oliver C., Suddaby R., Salin-Anderson K. Institutional logics. Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2008) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Todd E.The Explanation of Ideology, Family Structures and Social Systems (1985) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Useem M.Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers Are Changing the Face of Corporate America (1996) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Useem M. Corporate leadership in a globalizing equity market. Acad. Management Executive (1998) 12:43–59Google Scholar
  • Vuong Q. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica (1989) 57:307–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wealth Magazine Leadership succession of Formosa Plastics [in Chinese]. (1993) MarchGoogle Scholar
  • Whitley R. D. Divergent capitalisms. The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems (1999) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Williamson J. What should the World Bank think about the Washington consensus? World Bank Res. Observer (2000) 15:251–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong S. The Chinese family firm: A model. British J. Soc. (1985) 36(1):58–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young M. N., Peng M., Ahlstrom D., Bruton G. D., Jiang Y. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. J. Management Stud. (2008) 45(1):196–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yuen K. C., Hamilton R. T. Corporate divestment: An overview. J. Managerial Psych. (1993) 8:9–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajac E. J., Westphal J. D. The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2004) 69:433–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman E. W. Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:591–619CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.