Compensating Nondedicated Cross-Functional Teams

References

• Albers S. Optimization models for salesforce compensation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 89:1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alchian A. A., Demsetz H. Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1972) 62(5):777–795Google Scholar
• Auriol E., Friebel G., Pechlivanos L. Career concerns in teams. J. Labor Econom. (2002) 20(1):289–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker J. R. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):408–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Lee C. H. S., Whinston A. B. Incentives and computing systems for team-based organizations. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):487–504Link, Google Scholar
• Beersma B., Hollenbeck J. R., Humphrey S. E., Moon H., Conlon D. E., Ilgen D. R. Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Towards a contingency approach. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:572–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom M. The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Acad. Management J (1999) 42:25–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J., Burkhardt M. E. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:441–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. The contingent value of social capital. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:339–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cobb C. W., Douglas P. H. A theory of production. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1928) 18:139–165Google Scholar
• Coombs G., Gomez-Mejia L. R. Cross-functional pay strategies in high-technology firms. Compensation Benefits Rev. (1991) 23(5):40–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1988) 55:258–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Digman J. M. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Rev. Psych. (1990) 41:417–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Druskat V. U., Wolff S. B. Building the emotional intelligence of groups. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) March):81–90Google Scholar
• Dwyer F. R., Shurr P. H., Oh S. Developing buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing (1987) 51:11–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:57–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E. F., Jensen M. C. Agency problems and residual claims. J. Law Econom. (1983) 26:327–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farley J. U. An optimal plan for salesmen's compensation. J. Marketing Res. (1964) 1(May):39–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris G. R., Witt L. A., Hochwarter W. A. Interaction of social skill and general mental ability on job performance and salary. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86:1075–1082Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank R. H., Cook P. J.The Winner-Take-All Society (1995) (Penguin Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Gross S. E.Compensation for Teams: How to Design and Implement Team-Based Reward Systems (1995) (American Management Association, New York) Google Scholar
• Hansen D. G. Worker performance and group incentives: A case study. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1997) 51(1):37–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B. Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13:324–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:305–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanin-Lovers J., Cameron M. Team-based rewards systems. J. Compensation Benefits Rev. (1993) 56–60Google Scholar
• Kearney, Inc.The Team-Based Organization (1994) (A.T. Kearney Inc., Chicago) . A.T. Kearney Management Reports No. 41Google Scholar
• Lawler E. E., Sundstrom E. Creating effective pay systems for teams. Supporting Work Team Effectiveness (1999) (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco) 188–212Google Scholar
• Lawler E. E., Cohen S. J. Designing pay systems for teams. Amer. Compensation Assoc. J. (1992) 1(1):6–19Google Scholar
• Leana C. R. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):538–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maurer R. The challenge of creating cross-functional teams. (2006) . http://www.beyondresistance.com/htm/2article/cross_fun.htmGoogle Scholar
• McCabe K. A., Mukherji A., Runkle D. A. An experimental study of information and mixed-strategy play in the three-person matching-pennies game. Econom. Theory (2000) 15(2):421–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClurg L. N. Team rewards: How far have we come? Human Resource Management (2001) 40(1):73–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meidinger C., Rulliere J. L., Villeval M. C. Does team-based compensation give rise to problems when agents vary in their ability? Experiment. Econom. (2003) 6(3):253–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94:S154–S179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montemayor E. F. A model for aligning teamwork and pay. Amer. Compensation Assoc. J. (1994) 18–25Google Scholar
• Morgan R. M., Hunt S. D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Marketing (1994) 58(July):20–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitcher P., Smith A. D. Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(1):1–18Link, Google Scholar
• Putnam R. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. Amer. Prospect (1993) 13:25–42Google Scholar
• Putnam R. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. J. Democracy (1995) 6:65–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rob R., Zemsky P. Social capital, corporate culture, and incentive intensity. RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(2):243–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum M. E., Moore D. I., Cotton J. L., Cook M. S., Hieser R. A., Shovar M. N., Gray M. J. Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependency. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1980) 39:626–642Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley T. J. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influence. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):887–910Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin S., Mahajan V. The effect of reward structures on the performance of cross-functional product development teams. J. Marketing (2001) 65(2):35–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saunier A. M., Hawk E. J. Realizing the potential of teams through team-based rewards. Compensation Benefits Rev. (1994) 26(4):24–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw D. G., Schneier C. E. Team measurement and rewards: How some companies are getting it right? Human Resource Planning (1995) 18(3):34–49Google Scholar
• Shields M. D., Young S. M. Determinants of cost consciousness: A study of R&D professionals. J. Management Accounting Res. (1994) 6:175–196Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V. An investigation of the equal commission rate policy for a multi-product salesforce. Management Sci. (1981) 27(July):731–756Link, Google Scholar
• Wageman R. Interdependency and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):145–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R., Baker G. Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependency on group performance. J. Organ. Behav. (1997) 18(2):139–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger T. R., Marshall C. R. Determinants of incentive intensity in group-based rewards. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(2):149–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zobal C. The “ideal” team compensation system—An overview: Part I. Team Performance Management (1998) 4(5):235–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zobal C. The “ideal” team compensation system—An overview, Part II. Team Performance Management (1999) 5(1):23–40Crossref, Google Scholar