Ownership Structure and the Relationship Between Financial Slack and R&D Investments: Evidence from Korean Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0360

References

  • Ahmadjian C. L., Robbins G. A clash of capitalisms: Foreign shareholders and corporate restructuring in 1990s Japan. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2005) 70:451–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen F. Strategic management and financial markets. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:11–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson R., Reeb D. M. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. J. Finance (2003) 58:1301–1327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson R., Reeb D. M. Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:209–237Google Scholar
  • Anderson R., Mansi S., Reeb D. M. Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. J. Financial Econom. (2003) 68:263–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bae K.-H., Kang J.-K., Kim J.-M. Tunneling or value added? Evidence from mergers by Korean business groups. J. Finance (2002) 57:2695–2740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baek J. S., Kang J. K., Lee I. Business groups and tunneling: Evidence from private securities offerings by Korean chaebols. J. Finance (2006) 61:2415–2449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baek J. S., Kang J. K., Park K. S. Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from the Korean financial crisis. J. Financial Econom. (2004) 71:265–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker T., Nelson R. E. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:329–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baysinger B. D., Hoskisson R. E. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:72–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baysinger B., Kosnik R., Turk T. Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:205–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M., Mehta P., Mullainathan S. Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117:121–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Black B. S., Jang H., Kim W. Does corporate governance predict firms' market values? Evidence from Korea. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2006) 22:366–412CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois L. On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. (1981) 6:29–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois L., Singh J. Organizational slack and political behavior within top management groups. Acad. Management Proc. (1983) 43–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley M., Schipani C., Sundaram A., Walsh J. The purposes and accountability of the corporation in contemporary society: Corporate governance at crossroads. Law Contemporary Problems (1999) 62(3):9–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brickley J. A., Lease R. C., Smith C. W. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 20:267–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • An unruly guest from the westBusinessWeek (2006a) February 27Google Scholar
  • BusinessWeek A smoother ride minus the big wheel? (2006b) May 15Google Scholar
  • Casson M. The economics of the family firm. Scandinavian Econom. Hist. Rev. (1999) 17(1):10–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan S. H., Martin J., Kensinger J. Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. J. Financial Econom. (1990) 26:255–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S. J. Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Acad. Management J. (2003a) 46:238–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S. J.Financial Crisis and Transformation of Korean Business Groups: The Rise and Fall of Chaebols (2003b) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S. J., Hong J. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:429–448CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S. J., Chung C.-N., Mahmood I. P. When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:637–656LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cho D. S., Kim D. J., Rhee D. K. Latecomer strategies: Evidence from the semiconductor industry in Japan and Korea. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:489–505LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cho H.-D., Lee J.-K. The developmental path of networking capability of catch-up players in Korea's semiconductor industry. R&D Management (2003) 33:411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choe H., Kho B.-C., Stulz R. M. Do foreign investors destabilize stock markets? The Korean experience in 1997. J. Financial Econom. (1999) 54:227–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coff R. W. When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:119–133LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J., Cohen P., West S., Aiken L.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2003) 3rd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Damanpour F. The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. J. Management (1987) 13:675–688CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:555–590CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David P., Hitt M. A., Gimeno J. The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:144–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David P., Yoshikawa T., Chari M., Rasheed A. Strategic investments in Japanese corporations: Do foreign portfolio owners foster underinvestment or appropriate investment? Strategic Management J. (2006) 27:591–600CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G. F., Stout S. K. Organization theory and the market for corporate control: A dynamic analysis of the characteristics of large takeover targets, 1980–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:1980–1990CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz H., Lehn K. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93:1155–1177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dharwadkar R., George G., Brandes P. Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:650–669CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Douma S., George R., Kabir R. Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: Evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27:637–657CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Easterbrook F. Two agency cost explanations of dividends. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74:650–659Google Scholar
  • Eberhart A., Maxwell W., Siddique A. An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. J. Finance (2004) 59:623–650CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economist Repel boarders; South Korea. (2006) March 4Google Scholar
  • Fan J. P. H., Wong T. J. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. J. Accounting Econom. (2002) 33:401–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss P. C., Zajac E. J. The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:501–534Google Scholar
  • Gedajlovic E., Shapiro D. Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:533–553CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George G. Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:661–676CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gillan S. L., Starks L. T. Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective. J. Appl. Finance (2003) 13(2):4–22Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M., Smelser N. J., Swedberg R. Business groups. Handbook of Economic Sociology (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 453–475Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:685–702CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen G. S., Hill C. W. L. Are institutional investors myopic? A time-series study of four technology driven industries. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoshi T., Kashyap A., Scharfstein D. Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: Evidence from Japanese industrial groups. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106:33–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:323–329Google Scholar
  • Jensen M. C. Eclipse of the public corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1989) 67(5):61–74Google Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:305–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joh S. W. Corporate governance and firm profitability: Evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. J. Financial Econom. (2003) 68:287–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson S., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes A., Shleifer F. Tunneling. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90:22–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T., Palepu J. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75:41–50Google Scholar
  • Khanna T., Palepu K., Morck R. Emerging market business groups, foreign intermediaries, and corporate governance. Concentrated Corporate Ownership (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 265–293Google Scholar
  • Khanna T., Rivkin J. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:45–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim L.Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Kochhar R., David P. Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:73–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Corporate ownership around the world. J. Finance (1999) 54:471–517CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. Investor protection and corporate governance. J. Financial Econom. (2000a) 58:3–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. J. Finance (2000b) 55:1–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee P. M. A comparison of ownership structures and innovations of U.S. and Japanese firms. Managerial Decision Econom. (2005) 24(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee P. M., O'Neill H. Ownership structures and R&D investments of U.S. and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:212–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leff N. Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Econom. Development Cultural Change (1978) 26:661–675CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln J., Gerlach M., Ahmadjian C. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61:67–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahmood I., Mitchell W. Two faces: Effects of business groups on innovation in emerging economies. Management Sci. (2004) 50:1348–1365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McConnell J. J., Muscarella C. J. Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of the firm. J. Financial Econom. (1985) 14:399–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mishra C., McConaughy D. Founding family control and capital structure: The risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (1999) 23(4):53–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell G. R. Global technology policies for economic growth. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change (1999) 60:205–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitton T. A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. J. Financial Econom. (2002) 64:215–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers S. C., Majluf N. S. Corporate financing and investment decision: When firms have information that investors do not have. J. Financial Econom. (1984) 23:187–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakatani I., Heiduk G., Yamamura K. Effectiveness in technological innovation: Keiretsu versus conglomerates. Technological Competition and Interdependence: The Search for Policy in the United States, West Germany, and Japan (1990) (University of Washington Press, Seattle) 151–162Google Scholar
  • Nohria N., Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:1245–1264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Brien J. P. The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:415–431CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramaswamy K., Li M., Veliyath R. Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversify: A study of the Indian corporate context. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:345–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scharfstein D. S., Stein J. C. The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. J. Finance (2000) 55:2539–2564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulze W., Lubatkin M., Dino R. Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Acad. Management J (2003) 46:179–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulze W., Lubatkin M., Dino R., Buchholtz A. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:99–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sharfman M. P., Wolf G., Chase R. B., Tansik D. A. Antecedents of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13:601–614CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shefrin H., Statman M. Explaining investor preference for cash dividends. J. Financial Econom. (1984) 13:253–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shin H., Park Y. Financing constraints and internal capital markets: Evidence from Korean chaebols. J. Corporate Finance (1999) 5:169–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29:562–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solomon J., Solomon A., Park C.-Y. The evolving role of institutional investors in South Korean corporate governance: Some empirical evidence. Corporate Governance (2002) 10:211–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song M., Droge C., Hanvanich S., Calantone R. Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:259–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Useem M. Corporate leadership in a globalizing equity market. Acad. Management Executive (1998) 12(4):43–59Google Scholar
  • Varsakelis N. C. The impact of patent protection, economy openness and national culture on R&D investment: A cross-country empirical investigation. Res. Policy (2001) 30:1059–1068CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wan W. P., Hoskisson R. E. Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:27–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge J.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Yoshikawa T., Phan P., David P. The impact of ownership structure on wage intensity in Japanese corporations. J. Management (2005) 31:278–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.