New Directions in Corporate Governance Research

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0361

References

  • Aguilera R., Filatotchev I., Gospel H., Jackson G. An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(3):475–492LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C.Strategy, Change and Defensive Routines (1985) (Langman, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Bradley M., Schipani C. A., Sundaram A. K., Walsh J. P. The purposes and accountability of the corporation in contemporary society: Corporate governance at a crossroads. Law Contemporary Problems (2000) 62:9–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dharwadkar R., Goranova M., Brandes P., Khan R. Institutional ownership and monitoring effectiveness: It's not just how much you own, it's what else you own. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(3):419–440LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S. Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:505–538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graffin S. D., Wade J. B., Porac J. F., McNamee R. C. The impact of CEO status diffusion on the economic outcomes of other senior managers. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(3):457–474LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harris J., Bromiley P. Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:350–367LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman A., Nicholson G., Shropshire C. Directors' multiple identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(3):441–456LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Janis I. L.Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (1972) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Kim H., Kim H., Lee P. Ownership structure and the relationship between unabsorbed slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(3):404–418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pfarrer M. D., Smith K. G., Bartol K. M., Khanin D. M., Zhang X. Coming forward: The effects of social and regulatory forces on the voluntary restatement of earnings subsequent to wrongdoing. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(3):386–403LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal J. D., Bednar M. K. Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms' strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:262–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal J. D., Zajac E. J. Substance and symbolism in CEOs' long-term incentive plans. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:367–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal J. D., Zajac E. J. Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:202–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiesenfeld B. M., Wurthmann K. A., Hambrick D. C. The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: A process model. Acad. Management Rev. (2008) 33:231–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoshikawa T., Tsui-Auch L. S., McGuire J. Corporate governance reform as institutional innovation: The case of Japan. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:973–988LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zajac E. J., Westphal J. D., Hambrick D. C., Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L. Toward a behavioral theory of the CEO/board relationship: How research can enhance our understanding of corporate governance practices. Navigating Change: How CEOs, Top Teams, and Boards Steer Transformation (1998) 256–277Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.