Means vs. Ends: Implications of Process and Outcome Focus for Team Adaptation and Performance

References

• Arrow H., McGrath J. E. Membership matters: How member change and continuity affect small group structure, process, and performance. Small Group Res. (1993) 24:334–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick M. R., Neubert M. J., Mount M. K., Steward G. L. Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. (1998) 83(3):377–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettenhausen K., Murnighan J. K. The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:350–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blajenkova O., Kozhevnikov M., Motes M. A. Object-spatial imagery: A new self-report imagery questionnaire. Appl. Cognitive Psych. (2006) 20:239–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandon D. P., Hollingshead A. B. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Org. Sci. (2004) 15:633–644Link, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(3):552–560Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgoon J. K., Dillman L., Stem L. A. Adaptation in dyadic interaction: Defining and operationalizing patterns of reciprocity and compensation. Comm. Theory (1993) 3(4):295–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T. R., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1994) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D. J. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(1):40–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K. Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Org. Sci. (1992) 3(1):20–46Link, Google Scholar
• Choi H.-S., Thompson L. Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Org. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 98(2):121–132Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark R. M.Intelligence Analysis: A Target-Centric Approach (2004) (CQ Press, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Diener C. I., Dweck C. S. An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1978) 36:451–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dollard M. F., Winefield A. H. Organizational response to recommendations based on a study of stress among correctional officers. Internat. J. Stress Management (1994) 1(1):81–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Earley C. P., Wojnaroski P., Prest W. Task planning and energy expended: Exploration of how goals influence performance. J. Appl. Psych. (1987) 72(1–2):107–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericksen J., Dyer L. Right from the start: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49(3):438–471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C. J. Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31:9–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C. J., Hackman J. R. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1990) 47:65–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ginnett R. C., Wiener E., Kanki B., Helmreich R. Crews as groups: Their formation and their leadership. Cockpit Resource Management (1993) (Academic Press, New York) 71–98Google Scholar
• Goodale M. A., Gazzaniga M. S. Perception and action in the human visual system. The New Cognitive Neurosciences (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 365–378Google Scholar
• Goodale M. A., Milner A. D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neuroscience (1992) 15:20–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Lorsch J. W. The design of work teams. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 315–342Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. H. Group influences on individuals in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1992) (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 199–267Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Wageman R. A theory of team coaching. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30:269–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Brousseau K. R., Weiss J. A. The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1976) 16:350–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Perceptions of expertise and transactive memory in work relationships. Group Processes Intergroup Relations (2000) 3(3):257–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janz B. D., Colquitt J. A., Noe R. A. Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psych. (1997) 50(4):877–904Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr N. L., Tindale S. R. Group performance and decision making. Annual Rev. Psych. (2004) 55:623–655Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klimoski R., Mohammed S. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? J. Management (1994) 20(2):403–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov M., Kosslyn S. M., Shephard J. Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory Cognition (2005) 33:710–726Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S. W. J., Gully S. M., Nason E. R., Smith E. M., Ilgen D. R., Pulakos E. D. Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development (1999) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 240–292Google Scholar
• Latham G. P., Winter D. C., Locke E. A. Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. J. Organ. Behav. (1994) 15(1):49–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• LePine J. A. Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. J. Appl. Psych. (2005) 90:1153–1167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine J. M., Choi H. S., Salas E., Fiore S. M. Impact of personnel turnover on team peformance and cognition. Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance (2004) (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.) 153–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K., Lange D., Gillis L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:581–598Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K., Belliveau M., Herndon B., Keller J. Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2007) 103:159–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke E. A., Durham C. C., Poon J. M. L., Weldon E., Friedman S. L., Scholnick E. K. Goal setting, planning, and performance on work tasks for individuals and groups. The Developmental Psychology of Planning: Why, How, and When Do We Plan? (1997) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 239–262Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E.Groups: Interaction and Performance (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Argote L., Peterson R. S., Mannix E. A. Transactive memory in dynamic organizations. Leading and Managing People in the Dynamic Organization (2003) (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 135–162Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Levine J. M., Worchel S., Wood W., Simpson J. A. Problem identification by groups. Group Process and Productivity (1992) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 17–47Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Argote L., Krishnan R., Nye J. L., Brower A. M. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. What's Social about Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 57–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United StatesThe 9/11 Commission Report (2004) (W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Newell A., Simon H. A.Human Problem Solving (1972) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Okhuysen G. A. Structuring change: Familiarity and formal interventions in problem-solving groups. Acad. Management J. (2001) 40:794–808Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pulakos E. D., Arad S., Donovan M. A., Plamondon K. E. Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85(4):612–624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn R. W. Flow in knowledge work: High performance experience in the design of national security technology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:610–641Google Scholar
• Rao R., Argote L. Collective learning and forgetting: The effects of turnover and group structure. (1995) Annual Meeting of the American Psychological AssociationChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Rizzo J. R., House R. J., Lirtzman S. I. Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1970) 15:150–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. L.Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (1991) (McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Sherif M.The Psychology of Social Norms (1936) (Harper Collins, New York) Google Scholar
• Shure G. H., Rogers M. S., Larsen E. M., Tassone J. Group planning and task effectiveness. Sociometry (1962) 25:263–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith E. E. The effects of clear and unclear role expectations on group productivity and defensiveness. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1957) 55:213–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sperry L. Organizations that foster inappropriate aggression. Psych. Ann. (1998) 28(5):279–284Google Scholar
• Squire L. R., Knowlton B. J., Musen G. The structure and organization of memory. Annual Rev. Psych. (1993) 44:435–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Boettger R. D. Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(3):534–559Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steiner I.Group Process and Productivity (1972) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Stevenson H. H., Jarillo J. C., Etzioni A., Lawrence P. R. A new entrepreneurial paradigm. Socio-economics: Toward a New Synthesis (1991) (M. E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, NY) 185–210Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(4):8–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ullman M. T. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition (2004) 92:231–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ullman M. T., Pierpont E. I. Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex (2005) 41:399–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ungerleider L. G., Mishkin M., Ingle D. J., Goodale M. A., Mansfield R. J. W. Two cortical visual systems. Analysis of Visual Behavior (1982) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 549–586Google Scholar
• Vallacher R. R., Wegner D. M. What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psych. Rev. (1987) 94(1):3–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallacher R. R., Wegner D. M. Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 57(4):660–671Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallacher R. R., Wegner D. M., Somoza M. P. That's easy for you to say: Action identification and speech fluency. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 56(2):199–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Mullen B., Goethals G. R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1987) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weingart L. R. Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77(5):682–693Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weldon E., Weingart L. R. Group goals and group performance. British J. Soc. Psych. (1993) 32:307–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley A. W. Putting first things first: Outcome and process focus in task performing teams. J. Organ. Behav. (2009) 30:427–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley A. W., Gerbasi M. E., Chabris C. F., Kosslyn S. M., Hackman J. R. Bringing in the experts: How team composition and work strategy jointly shape analytic effectiveness. Small Group Res. (2008) 39(3):352–371Crossref, Google Scholar