Pre-Entry Knowledge, Learning, and the Survival of New Firms

References

• Agarwal R., Echambadi R., Franco A., Sarkar M. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and performance. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):501–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C., Norton E. C. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. (2003) 80(1):123–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison P. D., Leinhardt S. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology (1982) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 61–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansoff I. Critique of Henry Mintzberg's “The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management”. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(6):449–461Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B.The Entrepreneurial Society (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Bates T. Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1990) 72(4):551–559Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):996–1016Link, Google Scholar
• Bayus B., Agarwal R. The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival. Management Sci. (2007) 53(12):1887–1902Link, Google Scholar
• Bazerman M., Giuliano T., Appleman A. Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1984) 33(2):141–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman C. M., Burton M. D. Founding the future: Oath dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(1):3–24Link, Google Scholar
• Benus J. M. Self-employment programs: A new reemployment tool. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (1994) 19(2):73–85Google Scholar
• BfEGründungen aus dem Jahr 2001 (2004) (Büro für Existenzgründungen, Munich, Germany) Google Scholar
• Bhidé A.The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bird B. Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(3):442–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Block Z., MacMillan I. C. Milestones for successful venture planning. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1985) 63(September–October):184–196Google Scholar
• Boeker W., Carroll G. Organizational origins: Entrepreneurial and environmental imprinting at the time of founding. Ecological Models of Organizations (1988) (Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, MA) 33–51Google Scholar
• Bowen M. G. The escalation phenomenon reconsidered: Decision dilemmas or decision errors? Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(1):52–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd B. K. Strategic planning and financial performance: A meta-analytic review. J. Management Stud. (1991) 28(4):353–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(1):39–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brüderl J., Schüssler R. Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:530–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brüderl J., Preisendörfer P., Ziegler R. Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1992) 57(2):227–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(1):24–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caldwell D. F., O'Reilly C. A. Response to failure: The effects of choice and responsibility on impression management. Acad. Management J. (1982) 25:121–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camillus J. Evaluating the benefits of formal planning systems. Long Range Planning (1975) 8(3):33–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(1):40–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G., Mosakowski E. The career dynamics of self-employment. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1987) 32:570–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G. R., Bigelow L. S., Seidel M. L., Tsai L. B. The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American Automobile Industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:117–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter N., Gartner W., Reynolds P. Exploring start-up event sequences. J. Bus. Venturing (1996) 11:151–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castrogiovanni G. J. Pre-startup planning and the survival of new small businesses: Theoretical linkages. J. Management (1996) 22:801–822Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler G. N., Jansen E. The founder's self-assessed competence and venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing (1992) 7:223–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H., Rosenbloom R. S. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11:529–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper A. C., Sexton D. L., Smilor R. W. Entrepreneurship and high technology. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (1986) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 153–186Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1964) (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Darr E. D., Argote L., Epple E. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. (1995) 41(11):1750–1762Link, Google Scholar
• Dean J. W. J., Sharfman M. P. Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(2):368–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decarolis D. M., Deeds D. L. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotech industry. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:953–968Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmar F., Shane S. Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(12):1165–1185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmar F., Shane S. Does experience matter: The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organ. (2006) 4(3):215–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowell G., Swaminathan A. Racing and back-pedaling into the future: New product introduction and organizational mortality in the US bicycle industry. Organ. Stud. (2000) 21(2):405–431Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dumais S. A. Accumulating advantage and adversity on the path to post-secondary education: An application of a person-centered approach. Soc. Sci. Res. (2005) 34:304–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:543–576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans D. S., Leighton L. S. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(3):519–535Google Scholar
• Feeser H. R., Willard G. E. Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:87–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster A. D., Rosenzweig M. R. Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. J. Political Econom. (1995) 103:1176–1209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franco A. M., Filson D. Spin-outs: Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(4):841–860Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward & looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:113–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J., Folta T. B., Cooper A. C., Woo C. Y. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):750–783Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:109–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Gruber M. Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation—A process and contingency perspective. J. Bus. Venturing (2007) 22(6):782–807Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flow within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:473–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison M. I., Phillips B. Strategic decision making: An integrative explanation. Res. Sociol. Organ. (1991) 9:319–358Google Scholar
• Hatch N. W., Dyer J. H. Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:1155–1178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47:153–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E., Lieberman M. B. The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(4):725–760Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E., Raubitschek R. S. Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities, and products. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:961–979Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks W. A. Adjustment for bias caused by nonresponse in mailed surveys. Agricultural Econom. Res. (1949) 1:52–56Google Scholar
• Hinz T., Jungbauer-Gans M. Starting a business after unemployment: Characteristics and chances of success. Entrepreneurship Regional Development (1999) 11:317–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G. The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28:331–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland J., Holyoak K., Nisbett R., Thagard P.Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery (1986) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):88–115Link, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., Clark K. B. Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3(3):557–603Crossref, Google Scholar
• Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (2005) . Statistik zu Gründungen aus der Arbeitslosigkeit, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Irwin D. A., Klenow P. J. Learning-by-doing spillovers in the semiconductor industry. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102:1200–1227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B. Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica (1982) 50:649–670Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaghna W., Strauss A., Barley S., Brannen M. Y., Thomas R. The practice and uses of field research in the 21st century organization. J. Management Inquiry (1999) 8(1):67–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G., Tomz M., Wittenberg J. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. Amer. J. Political Sci. (2000) 44:347–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S. Employee startups in high-tech industries. Indust. Corporate Change (2001) 10(3):639–674Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S. The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(4):645–666Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S., Simons K. L. Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:997–1016Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Leblebici H., Salancik G. Effects of environmental uncertainty on information and decision processes in banks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:578–596Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lévesque M., Minniti M. The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior. J. Bus. Venturing (2006) 21:177–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., March J. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Soc. (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath R. G., MacMillan I. C.The Entrepreneurial Mindset (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Miller C. C., Cardinal L. B. Strategic planning and firm performance: A synthesis of more than two decades of research. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:1649–1665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mincer J., Ofek H. Interrupted work careers: Depreciation and restoration of human capital. J. Human Resources (1982) 17:3–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner A. S., Haunschild P. R., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Population level learning. Advances in Organizational Behavior (1995) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 115–166Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning (1994) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Mitchell W. Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents' entry into emerging industrial subfields. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(2):208–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• OECD Self-employment programs for the unemployed—Papers and proceedings. (1995) (OECD, Paris) Google Scholar
• Penrose E.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12:531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• SCBNyföretagandet i Sverige 1992 och 1993 (New Firm Formation in Sweden in 1992 and 1993) (1994) (SCB Publishing Unit, Örebro, Sweden) Google Scholar
• Schrader C. B., Mulford C., Blackburn V. Strategic and operational planning, uncertainty, and performance in small firms. J. Small Bus. Management (1989) 27(4):45–60Google Scholar
• Sexton D., Bowman-Upton N. Female entrepreneurs: Psychological characteristics and their role in gender related discrimination. J. Bus. Venturing (1990) 5:29–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sexton D., Bowman-Upton N.Entrepreneurship: Creativity and Growth (1991) (MacMillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Shah S., Agarwal R., Audretsch D. The knowledge context & the entrepreneurial process: Academic, user, and employee entrepreneurship. (2006) . Working paper, University of Illinois, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
• Shane S. Explaining variation in rates of entrepreneurship in the United States: 1899–1988. J. Management (1996) 22(5):747–781Google Scholar
• Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):448–469Link, Google Scholar
• Simon H.Administrative Behavior (1965) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. Strategy and organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:131–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer B., Ryff C., Carr D., Magee W. Linking life histories and mental health: A person centered strategy. Sociol. Methodology (1998) 28:1–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sleeper S. D. The role of firm capabilities in the evolution of the laser industry: The making of a high-tech market. (1998) . Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
• Staw B. M. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Acad. Management Rev. (1981) 6(4):577–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart R. W., Abetti P. A. Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance. J. Bus. Venturing (1991) 5:151–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1995) 17:27–43Google Scholar
• Thompson P. Selection and firm survival: Evidence from the shipbuilding industry, 1825–1914. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2005) 87(1):26–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thune S. S., House R. J. Where long-range planning pays off. Bus. Horizons (1970) 13(4):81–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomz M., Wittenberg J., King G. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results, v. 2.1. (2003) . Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/Google Scholar
• Tyre M. J., von Hippel E. The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(1):71–83Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):429–439Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E., Tyre M. J. How learning is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Res. Policy (1995) 24(1):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G., Nonaka I., Nishigushi T.Knowledge Creation: A Source of Value (1999) (MacMillan, London) Google Scholar
• Watson J., Everett J. E. Do small businesses have high failure rates? Evidence from Australian retailers. J. Small Bus. Management (1996) 34:45–62Google Scholar
• Weick K. Drop your tools: An allegory for organization studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:301–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiessner F. Das Überbrückungsgeld als instrument der arbeitsmarktpolitik - eine Zwischenbilanz. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (1998) 1:123–142Google Scholar
• Wiessner F. Erfolgsfaktoren von Existenzgründungen aus der Arbeitslosigkeit. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (2000) 33:518–532Google Scholar
• Winter S., Szulanski G. Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. (1999) 12(6):730–743Link, Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi K.Event History Analysis (1991) (Sage Publication, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., Covin J. G. Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:451–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):185–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman M. B. Learning effects and the commercialization of new energy technologies: The case of nuclear power. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13:297–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Brewer M. B. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(1):290–306Google Scholar