Value of Strong Ties to Disconnected Others: Examining Knowledge Creation in Biomedicine

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0388

References

  • Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 46:425–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T. J., Henn G. W.The Organization and Architecture of Innovation: Managing the Flow of Technology (2007) (Elsevier, Burlington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Amabile T. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behavior (1988) 10:123–167Google Scholar
  • Ancona D., Caldwell D. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):321–341LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. Economic welfare and the location of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 155–173Google Scholar
  • Baltagi B. H.Econometrics Analysis of Panel Data (2001) 2nd ed.(John Wiley, Chichester, NY) Google Scholar
  • Bian Y. Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2003) 62(3):366–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boissevain J.Friends of Friends: Networks, Manipulators and Coalitions (1974) (St. Martin's Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.Ucinet 5 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (1999) 5.4 ed.(Analytic Technologies, Natick, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bouty I. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researches across organizational boundaries. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(1):50–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bower G. H., Hilgard E. R.Theories of Learning (1981) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S., Lin N., Cook K., Burt R. Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. Social Capital (2001) (Aldine de Gruyter, New York) 31–56Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S., Rauch J. Closure and stability: Persistent reputation and enduring relations among bankers and analysts. The Missing Links: Formation and Decay in Economic Networks (2007) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cameron A. C., Trivedi P. K. Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. J. Econometrics (1990) 46(3):347–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cockburn I., Henderson R. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(2):157–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94:95–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cross R., Sproull L. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):446–462LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz H., Williamson O. E., Winter S. G., Coase R. H. The theory of the firm revisited. The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) 159–179Google Scholar
  • Erickson B. H., Wellman B., Berkowitz S. D. The relational basis of attitudes. Social Structures: A Network Approach (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) 99–121Google Scholar
  • Fleming L., Mingo S., Chen D. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2007) 52:443–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gargiulo M., Benassi M., Leenders R. T. A. J., Gabbay S. M. The dark side of social capital. Corporate Social Capital and Liability (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 298–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S., Marsden P. V., Lin N. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Social Structure and Network Analysis (1982) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 105–130Google Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R., Goldeng E., Ketchen D. J., Bergh D. D. Longitudinal analysis in strategic management. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (2004) 1(Elsevier, New York) Google Scholar
  • Haken H.Synergetics: Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (1978) 2nd ed.(Springer, Berlin) Google Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Staw B. M., Kramer R. M. Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior (2002) (Elsevier, Oxford) 41–85Google Scholar
  • Hargadon A.How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):716–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Building an innovation factory. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(3):157–166Google Scholar
  • Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(6):1183–1194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27(1):81–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):502–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 216–239Google Scholar
  • Kuhn T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Lakatos I.Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (1970) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin D. Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1477–1490LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin N.Social Capital (2001) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lindsay P. H., Norman D. A.Human Information Processing (1977) (Academic Press, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Long J. S. Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1978) 43(6):889–908CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCrimmon K. R., Wagner C. Stimulating ideas through creativity software. Management Sci. (1994) 40(11):1514–1532LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V. Network data and measurement. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1990) 16:435–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V., Campbell K. E. Measuring tie strength. Soc. Forces (1984) 63:482–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadyen M. A., Cannella A. A. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns to the number and strength of exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(5):735–746CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadyen M. A., Cannella A. A. Knowledge creation and the location of university research scientists' interpersonal exchange relations: Within and beyond the university. Strategic Organ. (2005) 3(2):131–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nerkar A., Paruchuri S. Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):771–785LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. United States Amer. (2001) 98(2):404–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J. Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. Complex Networks (2004) (Springer, Berlin) Google Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Nishiguchi T., Nonaka I., Nishiguchi T. Conclusion: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. Knowledge Emergence (2001) (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Knowledge (1995) (Oxford University Press, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. Social networks, the Tertius Iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:100–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M.The Tacit Dimension (1966) (Doubleday and Company, Inc., Garden City, NY) Google Scholar
  • Portes A., Sensenbrenner J. Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98:1320–1135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Provan K. G., Sebastian J. G. Networks within networks: Service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):453–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The transfer problem revisited. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:240–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):502–517LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Seibert S. E., Kraimer M. L., Liden R. C. A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):219–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro D. W., Wenger N. S., Shapiro M. F. The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. (1994) 271:438–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A., Kuhn R. I. What we know about the creative process. Frontiers in Creative and Innovative Management (1985) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 3–20Google Scholar
  • Spender J. C. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):45–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephan P. E. The economics of science. J. Econom. Literature (1996) 34:1199–1235Google Scholar
  • Stephan P. E., Levin S. G. Inequality in scientific performance: Adjustment for attribution and journal impact. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1991) 21(2):351–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton R. I., Hargadon A. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(4):685–718CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(5):996–1004CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):464–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams K. Y., O'Reilly C. A. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. (1998) 20:77–140Google Scholar
  • Woodman R. W., Sawyer J. E., Griffin R. W. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(2):293–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):76–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao Z., Anand J., Mitchell W. Transferring collective knowledge: Teaching and learning in the Chinese auto industry. Strategic Organ. (2004) 2(2):133–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou J., George J. M. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):682–696CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Brewer M. B. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(1):290–306Google Scholar
  • Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Brewer M. B., Peng Y., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Collaboration structure and information dilemmas in biotechnology. Trust in Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 90–113Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.