The Role of Analogy in the Institutionalization of Sustainability Reporting

References

• AccountAbility Strategic challenges for business in the use of corporate responsibility codes, standards, and frameworks. (2004) . World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Accessed December 16, 2009, http://www.wbcsd.org/web/publications/accountability-codes.pdfGoogle Scholar
• AccountAbility The materiality report: Aligning strategy, performance and reporting. (2006) . Accessed December 16, 2009, http://www.accountability.org/uploadedFiles/publications/The%20Materiality%20Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Aldrich H. E., Fiol C. M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(4):645–670Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alinsky S. D.Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals (1971) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Anthony R. N.Rethinking the Rules of Financial Accounting: Examining the Rules for Proper Reporting (2004) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Bansal P. Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(3):197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron J. N., Dobbin F. R., Jennings P. D. War and peace: The evolution of modern personnel administration in U.S. industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (1986) 92(2):350–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J., Leca B., Boxenbaum E. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Ann. (2009) 3:65–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger P. L., Luckmann T.The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (1967) (Anchor Books, Garden City, NY) Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum E., Battilana J. Importation as innovation: Transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organ. (2005) 3(4):355–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• British Petroleum Sustainability report. (2004) . Accessed December 16, 2009, http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/S/Sustainability_Report_2004.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Brown H. S., de Jong M., Lessidrenska T. The rise of the global reporting initiative (GRI) as a case of institutional entrepreneurship. (2007) . Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Working Paper 36, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Campbell J. L. Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory Soc. (1998) 27(3):377–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carruthers B. G., Espeland W. N. Accounting for rationality: Double-entry bookkeeping and the rhetoric of economic rationality. Amer. J. Sociol. (1991) 97(1):31–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• CERES CERES Principles. (2006) . Accessed July 22, 2006, http://www.ceres.org/coalitionandcompanies/principles.phpGoogle Scholar
• Colyvas J. A. Factory, hazard, and contamination: The use of metaphor in the commercialization of recombinant DNA. Minerva (2007) 45(2):143–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen J. P. Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(4):751–764Crossref, Google Scholar
• Creed W. E. D., Langstraat J. A., Scully M. A. A picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organ. Res. Methods (2000) 5(1):34–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarniawska-Joerges B., Sevón G.Translating Organizational Change (1996) (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl D. W., Moreau P. The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(1):47–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F., Diekmann K. A., Tinsley C. H. The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1994) 59(4):547–570Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djelic M.-L.Exporting the American Model: The PostWar Transformation of European Business (1998) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Douglas M.How Institutions Think (1986) (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY) Google Scholar
• Economist, The Corporate storytelling: Non-financial accounting is now too serious to be left to amateurs. (2004) November 4):13–14Google Scholar
• Elkington J., Emerson J., Beloe S. The value palette: A tool for full spectrum strategy. California Management Rev. (2006) 48(2):6–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., March J. G. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(2):171–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss P. C., Hirsch P. M. The discourse of globalization: Framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2005) 70(1):29–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford Motor Company Our route to sustainability: Connecting with society—Ford sustainability report 2004/2005. (2005) . Accessed December 16, 2009, http://www.ford.com/about-ford/investor-relations/company-reports/annual-reports/report-detail/sustain-2004-05Google Scholar
• Friedland R., Alford R. R., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 232–263Google Scholar
• Gamson W. A., Modigliani A. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. Amer. J. Sociol. (1989) 95(1):1–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Jain S., Tuertscher P. Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organ. Stud. (2008) 29(3):351–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. A., Rivkin J. W. Strategy-making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(8):691–712Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D., Vosniadou S., Ortony A. The mechanisms of analogical learning. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (1989) (Cambridge University Press, London) 199–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D., Holyoak K. J. Reasoning and learning by analogy: Introduction. Amer. Psychologist (1997) 52(1):32–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing Accountability J. (1995) 8(2):47–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green S. E. A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29(4):653–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Suddaby R., Hinings C. R. Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):58–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• GRISustainability Reporting Guidelines: Exposure Draft for Public Comment and Pilot Testing (1999) (CERES, Boston) Google Scholar
• GRISustainability Reporting Guidelines (2000) (Global Reporting Initiative, Boston) Google Scholar
• GRISustainability Reporting Guidelines (2002) (Global Reporting Initiative, Boston) Google Scholar
• GRI The GRI—An overview. (2006a) . Accessed April 2, 2006, http://www.globalreporting.org/about/Overview.pdfGoogle Scholar
• GRISustainability Reporting Guidelines (2006b) (Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
• Hargadon A. B., Douglas Y. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(3):476–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H. A., Rao H., Paruchuri S. The winds of change: The progressive movement and the bureaucratization of thrift. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2007) 72(1):117–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawken P., Wackernagel M. Satisfying lives for all within the means of nature: How a honed GRI could advance true sustainability. (2000) . Mimeo, GRI/CERES, Boston. http://globalreporting.org/PilotFeedback/CommissionedFeedback/CommissionedFeedback.htmGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman A. J. A strategic response to investor activism. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 37(2):51–64Google Scholar
• Hoffman A. J., Ventresca M. J. The institutional framing of policy debates: Economics versus the environment. Amer. Behavioral Scientist (1999) 42(8):1368–1392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland J. H., Holyoak K. J., Nisbett R. E., Thagard P. R.Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery (1989) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3(4):305–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolk A. A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance. Internat. J. Environment Sustainable Development (2004) 3(1):51–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• KPMG KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005. (2005) . KPMG, London. Accessed December 16, 2009, http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/International-corporate-responsibility-survey-2005.pdfGoogle Scholar
• KPMG KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2008. (2008) . KPMG, London. Accessed December 16, 2009, http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/International-corporate-responsibility-survey-2008.pdfGoogle Scholar
• KPMG, UNEP Carrots and sticks for starters: Current trends and approaches in voluntary and mandatory standards for sustainability reporting. (2006) . KPMG and UNEP. Accessed December 16, 2009, http://www.kpmg.com/au/Portals/0/Carrots_and_Sticksfinal.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Labelle R., Schatt A., Sinclair-Desgagné B., Allouche J. Corporate sustainability reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility, Volume 1: Concepts, Accountability and Reporting (2006) (Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, UK) 376Google Scholar
• Lakoff G., Johnson M.Metaphors We Live By (2003) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence T. B., Hardy C., Phillips N. Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):281–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leblebici H., Salancik G. R., Copay A., King T. Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:333–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lober D. J., Bynum D., Campbell E., Jacques M. The 100 plus corporate environmental report study: A survey of an evolving environmental management tool. Bus. Strategy Environment (1997) 6(2):57–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M. Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):29–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M. A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(2):289–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M., Glynn M. A. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6–7):545–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maguire S., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(5):657–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsh R. L., Ward T. B., Landau J. D. The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task. Memory Cognition (1999) 27(1):94–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathews M. R. Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: Is there a silver jubilee to celebrate? Accounting, Auditing Accountability J. (1997) 10(4):481–531Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83(2):340–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyerson D. E.Tempered Radicals: How Everyday Leaders Inspire Change at Work (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Milne M. J., Ball A., Gray R. From soothing palliatives and towards ecological literacy: A critique of the triple bottom line. (2005) . Accountancy and Business Law Working Papers, University of Otago, Dunedin, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
• Mills C. W. Situated actions and vocabulary of motive. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1940) 5(6):904–913Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan G. Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(4):605–622Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norman W., MacDonald C. Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Bus. Ethics Quart. (2004) 14(2):243–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oakes L. S., Townley B., Cooper D. J. Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(2):257–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Summer):187–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W., Joseph J. Cultural adaptation and institutional change: The evolution of vocabularies of corporate governance, 1972–2003. Poetics (2005) 33(3–4):163–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Mahony S., Ferraro F. The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(5):1079–1106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oswick C., Keenoy T., Grant D. Metaphor and analogical reasoning in organization theory: Beyond orthodoxy. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):294–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett J. F., McLean P. D. Organizational invention and elite transformation: The birth of partnership systems in Renaissance Florence. Amer. J. Sociol. (2006) 111(5):1463–1568Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips N., Hardy C.Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction (2002) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips N., Lawrence T. B., Hardy C. Discourse and institutions. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29(4):635–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H. Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1998) 103(4):912–961Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay T., Hinings C. R. The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organ. Stud. (2005) 26(3):351–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards T., Dickson D. Guidelines by stakeholders, for stakeholders: Is it worth the effort? J. Corporate Citizenship (2007) 25(Spring):19–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M. What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the U.S. economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Econom. Rev. (2007) 5(1):47–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (1947) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Skillius A., Wennberg U. Continuity, credibility and comparability: Key challenges for corporate environmental performance measurement and communication. (1998) . The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics at Lund University. Accessed December 16, 2009, http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/ESS09Google Scholar
• Stark D. Recombinant property in east European capitalism. Amer. J. Sociol. (1996) 101(4):993–1027Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D., Soule S. A. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1998) 24:265–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman M. C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):571–610Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suddaby R., Greenwood R. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(1):35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• SustainAbility Trust us: The global reporters 2002 survey of corporate sustainability reporting. (2002) . SustainAbility Ltd. and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Accessed December 16, 2009, http://www.sustainability.com/aboutsustainability/article_previous.asp?id=131Google Scholar
• SustainAbility Risk & opportunity: Best practice in non-financial reporting. (2004) . SustainAbility Ltd. and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Accessed December 16, 2009, http://www.sustainability.com/aboutsustainability/article_previous.asp?id=128Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Offices Clearer requirements for information about sustainability for state-owned companies. (2007) . Accessed May 4, 2008, http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/8194/a/93506Google Scholar
• Thelen K. A.How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan (2004) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28(1):22–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townley B. The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):163–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H. Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organization theory. Organ. Stud. (1993) 14(3):323–346Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. (1986) 32(7):791–805Link, Google Scholar
• Waddock S., White A. L. On CERES, the GRI and Corporation 20/20. J. Corporate Citizenship (2007) 26(Summer):38–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M.Economy and Society (1922) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):516–531Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler D., Elkington J. The end of the corporate environmental report? Or the advent of cybernetic sustainability reporting and communication. Bus. Strategy Environment (2001) 10(1):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• White A. L. Sustainability and the accountable corporation: Society's rising expectations of business. Environment (1999) 41(8):30–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willis A. The role of the global reporting initiative's sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. J. Bus. Ethics (2003) 43(3):233–237Crossref, Google Scholar