To Share or Not to Share? Professional Norms, Reference Groups, and Information Withholding Among Life Scientists

References

• Abbott A. Status and status strain in the professions. Amer. J. Sociol. (1981) 86:819–835Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbott A.The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (1988) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45:905–917Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Ophir R., Baum J. A. C. Intraorganizational learning. Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 181–207Google Scholar
• Argyres N. S., Liebeskind J. P. Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1998) 35:427–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberger P., Biron M. Group norms and excessive absenteeism: The role of peer referent others. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2007) 103:179–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J., Feldman M., Malerba F., Brusoni S. Academic entrepreneurs: Who participates and why? Perspectives on Innovation (2007) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 381–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Rosenholtz S. J., Zelditch M. Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1980) 6:479–508Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bierly P., Chakrabarti A. Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:123–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D., Campbell E. G., Anderson M. S., Causino N., Louis K. S. Withholding research results in academic life science: Evidence from a national survey of faculty. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. (1997) 277:1224–1228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D., Campbell E. G., Gokhale M., Yucel R., Clarridge B., Hilgartner S., Holtzman N., Ferris T. G. Data withholding in genetics and the other life sciences: Prevalences and predictors. Acad. Medicine (2006) 81:137–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boisot M.Knowledge Assets, Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy (1998) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Bok S.Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation (1982) (Pantheon Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:40–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R., Knez M., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Trust and third-party gossip. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 68–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabrera A., Cabrera E. F. Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organ. Stud. (2002) 23:687–710Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell E. G., Clarridge B. R., Gokhale M., Birenbaum L., Hilgartner S., Holtzman N. A., Blumenthal D. Data withholding in academic genetics: Evidence from a national survey. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. (2002) 287:473–480Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini R. B., Reno R. R., Kallgren C. A. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1990) 58:1015–1026Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. Links and impact: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. (2000) 48:1–23Google Scholar
• Cook-Deegan R. M., McCormack S. J. Intellectual property: Patents, secrecy, and DNA. Science (2001) 293:217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dacin M. T., Goodstein J., Scott W. R. Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:45–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. (1996) 32:5–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:350–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz H. Entrepreneurial science in the academy: A case of the transformation of norms. Soc. Problems (1989) 36:14–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman S. P. Secrecy, information, and politics: an essay on organizational decision making. Human Relations (1988) 41:73–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations (1954) 7:117–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fowler F. J.Survey Research Methods (1993) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Flynn F. Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30:737–750Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freidson E.Professionalism: The Third Logic (2001) (University of Chicago, Illinois) Google Scholar
• Goode W. J. Community within a community: The professions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1957) 22:194–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S. An examination of the referents used in the evaluation of pay. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1974) 12:170–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagstrom W. O.The Academic Community (1965) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Mors M. L., Løvås B. Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:776–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilgartner S., Brandt-Rauf S. I. Data access, ownership, and control: Toward empirical studies of access practices. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization (1994) 15:355–372Google Scholar
• Hyman H., Singer E.Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research (1968) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:422–447Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson J., Steiner I. D., Fishbein M. Social stratification, social norms, and roles. Current Studies in Social Psychology (1965) (Holt, Rinhart, & Winston, New York) 301–309Google Scholar
• Jansen E., Glinow M. Ethical ambivalence and organizational reward systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10:814–822Google Scholar
• Katz D., Kahn R. L.The Social Psychology of Organizations (1966) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Kidwell R. E., Bennett N. Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:429–456Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina K. Scientific communities or transepistemic arenas of research? A critique of quasi-economic models of science. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1982) 12:101–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina K.Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (1999) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larsson R., Bengtsson L., Henriksson K., Sparks J. The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:285–305Link, Google Scholar
• Lawrence B. S. Organizational reference groups: A missing perspective on social context. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:80–100Link, Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld P. F., Merton R. K., Berger M., Abel T., Page C. H. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (1954) (Van Nostrand, New York) 18–66Google Scholar
• Leicht K. T., Fennell M. L.Professional Work: A Sociological Approach (2001) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
• Levin D. Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50:1477–1490Link, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind J. P., Oliver A. L., Zucker L., Brewer M. Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:428–443Link, Google Scholar
• Louis K. S., Blumenthal D., Gluck M. E., Stoto M. A. Entrepreneurs in Academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:110–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louis K. S., Jones L. M., Anderson M. S., Blumenthal D., Campbell E. G. Entrepreneurship, secrecy, and productivity: A comparison of clinical and non-clinical life sciences faculty. J. Tech. Transfer (2001) 26:233–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski C. F. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60:531–542Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden P. V., Friedkin N. E. Network studies of social influence. Sociol. Methods Res. (1993) 22:127–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCain K. W. Communication, competition, and secrecy: The production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics. Sci. Tech. Human Values (1991) 16:491–516Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K. The ambivalence of scientists. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hospital (1963) 112:77–97Google Scholar
• Merton R. K., Merton R. K. Continuities in the theory of reference groups and social structure. Social Theory and Social Structure (1968) (Free Press, New York) 335–440Google Scholar
• Merton R. K., Merton R. K. The normative structure of science. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1973) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 267–278Google Scholar
• Merton R. K.Sociological Ambivalence (1976) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Merton R. K., Barber E., Tiryakian E. A. Sociological ambivalence. Sociological Theory, Values, and Socio-Cultural Change (1963) (The Free Press, New York) 91–120Google Scholar
• Merton R. K., Rossi A. S., Merton R. K., Lazarsfeld P. F. Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. Continuities in Social Research (1950) (The Free Press, New York) 40–105Google Scholar
• Merton R. K., George G., Kendall P. L.The Student-Physician: Introductory Studies in the Sociology of Medical Education (1957) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Mills E. W. Sociological ambivalence and social order: The constructive uses of normative dissonance. Sociol. Soc. Res. (1983) 67:279–287Google Scholar
• Mitroff I. Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1974) 39:579–595Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulkay M. J. Some aspects of cultural growth in the sciences. Soc. Res. (1969) 36:22–52Google Scholar
• Murray F. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Res. Policy (2004) 33:643–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F., Stern S. Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 63 :648–687Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Research CouncilSharing Publication-Related Data and Materials: Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Sciences (2003) (National Academies Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Nelkin D.Science as Intellectual Property: Who Controls Research? (1984) (MacMillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J. Managing laboratory work through skepticism: Processes of evaluation and control. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2001) 66:427–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:5–21Link, Google Scholar
• Pavalko R. M.Sociology of Occupations and Professions (1988) 2nd ed.(Peacock, Itasca, IL) Google Scholar
• Phillips K. W., Rothbard N. P., Dumas T. L. To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Acad. Management Rev. (2009) 34:710–732Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M. The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva (1962) 1:54–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G. The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:456–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quigley N. R., Tesluk P. E., Locke E. A., Bartol K. M. A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:71–88Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W. R. Reactions to supervision in a heteronomous professional organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1965) 10:65–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel A. E., Siegel S., Doob A., Regan D. T. Reference groups, membership groups, and attitude change. Readings in Experimental Social Psychology (1971) (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York) 391–398Google Scholar
• Singer E., Rosenberg M., Turner R. H. Reference groups and social evaluation. Social Psychology and Sociological Perspectives (1981) (Transaction, New Brunswick, NH) 66–93Google Scholar
• Singh P. Perception and reactions to inequity as a function of social comparison referents and hierarchical levels. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1994) 24:557–565Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sismondo S.An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies (2004) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
• Smelser N. J. The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences: 1997 Presidential Address. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1998) 63:1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen J. B. The use and misuse of the coefficient of variation in organizational demography research. Sociol. Methods Res. (2002) 30:475–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen J. E., Sorensen T. L. The conflict of professionals in bureaucratic organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1974) 19:98–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S.Connections (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Strang D., Meyer J. W. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory Soc. (1993) 22:487–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Ding W. W. When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. (2006) 112:97–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton J. R. Organizational autonomy and professional norms in science: A case study of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1984) 14:197–224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:27–43Google Scholar
• Terry D. J., Hogg M. A., Duck J. M., Abrams D., Hogg M. A. Group membership, social identity, and attitudes. Social Identity and Social Cognition (1999) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 280–314Google Scholar
• Thornton P. H., Ocasio W., Greenwook R., Oliver C., Suddaby R., Sahlin K. Institutional logics. Organizational Institutionalism (2008) (Sage, Los Angeles) 99–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P., Hong W. Secrecy is increasing in step with competition. Nature (2003) 422:801–802Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P., Cohen W. M., Cho C. Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research. Res. Policy (2007) 36 :1184–1203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilensky H. L. The professionalization of everyone? Amer. J. Sociol. (1964) 70:137–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaughan D. The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1999) 25:271–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zabusky S. E., Barley S. R. You can't be a stone if you're cement: Reevaluating the emic identities of scientists in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1997) 19(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 361–404Google Scholar