PERSPECTIVE—Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0503

References

  • Adner R., Helfat C. E. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1011–1025CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):317–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G., Lampert C. M. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:521–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersen T. J., Foss N. J. Strategic opportunity and economic performance in multinational enterprises: The role and effects of information and communication technology. J. Internat. Management (2005) 11:293–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andriopoulos C., Lewis M. W. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):696–717LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Augier M., Teece D. J. Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):410–421LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bacharach S. B. Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:496–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benson D., Ziedonis R. H. Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: Implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):329–351LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bettis R. A., Prahalad C. K. The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:5–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calori R., Johnson G., Sarnin P. CEOs' cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:437–457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Capron L., Mitchell W. Selection capability: How capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):294–312LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough H.Open Innovation (2003) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cockburn I. M., Henderson R. M. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring bahaviour, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46:157–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. (1989) 99:569–596Google Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Sci. (1994) 40(2):227–251LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Fortune favors the prepared firm—Reply. Management Sci. (1997) 43(10):1463–1468LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Cross R., Cummings J. N. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge intensive network. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):928–937CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Czarnitzki D., Kraft K. An empirical test of the asymmetric models on innovative activity: Who invests more into R&D, the incumbent or the challenger? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2004) 54(2):153–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daghfous A. Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. S.A.M. Advanced Management J. (2004) 69(2):21–27Google Scholar
  • Dansereau F., Yammarino F. J., Kohles J. C. Multiple levels of analysis from a longitudinal perspective: Some implications for theory building. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24:346–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David P. A.Technical Choice Innovation and Economic Growth (1975) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • De Boer M., Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. J. Management Stud. (1999) 36 :379–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhanaraj C., Lyles M., Steensma K., Tihanyi L. The dynamics of relational embeddedness: Tacit and explicit learning in international joint ventures. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2004) 35(5):428–443CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dijksterhuis M. S., Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of coevolution. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:569–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A., Tsang E. Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. J. Management Stud. (2008) 45(4):661–674CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eggers J. P., Kaplan S. Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects of incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20:461–477LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feinberg S. E., Gupta A. K. Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:823–845CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T., Foss N. Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organ. (2005) 3(4):441–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol C. M., Lyles M. A. Organizational learning. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10:803–813CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Floyd S. W., Lane P. J. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:154–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N. J. Knowledge and organization in the theory of the multinational enterprise. J. Management Governanace (2006) 10:3–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N., Mahnke V., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. Knowledge management: What can organizational economics contribute? Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (2003) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 78–103Google Scholar
  • Foss N. J., Pedersen T. Organizing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation: An introduction. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2004) 35:340–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N. J., Laursen K., Pedersen T. Organizing to gain from interaction with consumers: The role of organizational practices for absorptive and innovative capacity. (2006) . Working paper, Copenhagen Business School, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R., Nayyar P. R. Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:365–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroski P., Machin S., Van Reenen J. The profitability of innovating firms. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(2):198–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996a) 17:109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996b) 7:375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Puranam P. Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20:422–440LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within the multinational corporation. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:473–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B., Barrell R., Mason G., O'Mahony M. Innovation and market value. Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 177–198Google Scholar
  • Huygens M., Baden-Fuller C., Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Co-evolution of firm capabilities and industry competition: Investigating the music industry, 1877–1997. Organ. Stud. (2001) 22:971–1011CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jansen J. J. P., Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:999–1015CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kedia B. L., Bhagat R. S. Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13:559–571Google Scholar
  • Kogut B. The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):405–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koza M. P., Lewin A. Y. The coevolution of network alliances: A longitudinal analysis of an international professional service network. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):638–653LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lane P. J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and inter-organizational learning. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:461–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane P. J., Koka B. R., Pathak S. The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(4):833–863CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane P. J., Salk J. E., Lyles M. A. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:1139–1161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laursen K., Salter A. J. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovative performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27:131–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lenox M., King A. Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:331–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin A. Y., Volberda H. W. Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:519–534LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin A. Y., Long C. P., Carroll T. N. The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10 :535–550LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lichtenthaler U. Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Acad. Management J. (2009) 52(4):822–846CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim K. The many faces of absorptive capacity: Spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips. Indust. Corporate Change (2009) 18(6):1249–1284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loasby B. J.Choice, Complexity and Ignorance (1976) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Lyles M. A. Learning among joint venture sophisticated firms. Management Internat. Rev. (1988) 28:85–98Google Scholar
  • Lyles M. A., Salk J. E. Knowledge acquisition from foreign partners in international joint ventures. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1996) 27(5):877–904CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyles M. A., Schwenk C. R. Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge structures. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29:155–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29:145–187Google Scholar
  • Matusik S. F., Heeley M. B. Absorptive capacity in the software industry: Identifying dimensions that affect knowledge and knowledge creation activities. J. Management (2005) 31:549–572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily S. K., Chakravarthy B. The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(4):285–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minbaeva D., Pedersen T., Björkman I., Fey C. F., Park H. J. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2003) 34:586–599CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mom T. J. M., Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Investigating manager's exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. J. Management Stud. (2007) 44(6):910–931CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E. Inward technology—Transfer and competitiveness—The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge J. Econom. (1995) 19(1):67–93Google Scholar
  • Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E., Silverman B. S. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:77–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nicholls-Nixon C. Absorptive capacity and technological sourcing: Implications for the responsiveness of established firms. (1993) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, INGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(3):14–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., von Krogh G. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20:635–652LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Noyons E. C. M., Van Raan A. F. J. Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1998a) 49(1):68–81Google Scholar
  • Noyons E. C. M., Van Raan A. F. J. Advanced mapping of science and technology. Scientometrics (1998b) 41:61–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noyons E. C. M., Luwel M., Moed H. F. Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1999) 50(2):115–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennings J. M., Harianto F. The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:29–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G. P. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning—An empirical—Analysis of process-development. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(Special Issue):85–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:116–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prahalad C. K., Bettis R. A. The dominant logic. A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:485–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P., Singh H., Chauduri S. Integrating acquired capabilities: When structural intregration is (un)necessary. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):313–328LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:240–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J.The Modern Firm (2004) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49:751–766LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothaermel F. T., Alexandre M. T. Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):759–780LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sanchez R.Knowledge Management and Organizational Competence (2001) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Organizations—Rational, Natural and Open Systems (1987) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:448–469LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shenkar O., Li J. Knowledge search in international cooperative ventures. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(2):134–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sidhu J., Commandeur H., Volberda H. W. The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sorensen J. B., Stuart T. E. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 47:81–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H. Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29:713–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stiglitz J. E., Dasgupta P., Stoneman P. Learning to learn, localized learning and technological progress. Economic Policy and Technological Performance (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Stock G. N., Greis N. P., Fischer W. A. Absorptive capacity and new product development. J. High Tech. Management Res. (2001) 12:77–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:668–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28:1319–1350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Todorova G., Durisin B. Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(3):774–786CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:996–1004CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:179–190LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1999) 64:481–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bosch F. A. J., Van Wijk R., Sanchez R. Creation of managerial capabilities through managerial knowledge integration: A competence-based perspective. Knowledge Management and Organizational Competence (2001) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 159–176Google Scholar
  • Van den Bosch F. A. J., Van Wijk R., Volberda H. W., Easterby–Smith M., Lyles M. A. Absorptive capacity: Antecedents, models and outcomes. The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (2003) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 278–301Google Scholar
  • Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W., De Boer M. Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:551–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Wijk R., Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A. Knowledge and networks. The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (2003) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 428–453Google Scholar
  • Volberda H. W. Toward the flexible firm: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):359–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Volberda H. W.Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive (1998) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Volberda H. W., Lewin A. Y. Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. J. Management Stud. (2003) 40:2111–2136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volberda H. W., Baden-Fuller C., Van den Bosch F. A. J. Mastering strategic renewal: Mobilising renewal journeys in multi-unit firms. Long Range Planning (2001) 34:159–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whittington R., Pettigrew A., Peck S., Fenton E., Conyon M. Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study 1992–1996. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:583–600LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27:185–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.