Suboptimal Assessment of Interunit Task Interdependence: Modes of Integration and Information Processing for Coordination Performance

References

• Adler P. S. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):147–167Link, Google Scholar
• Adler P. S., Borys B. Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):61–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja M. K., Galletta D. F., Carley K. M. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):21–38Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27(3):420–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barki H., Pinsonneault A. A model of organizational integration, implementation effort, and performance. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):165–179Link, Google Scholar
• Beyer J. M., Chattopadhyay P., George E., Glick W. H., Ogilvie D. T., Pugliese D. The selective perception of managers revisited. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(3):716–737Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. Network analysis of 2-mode data. Soc. Networks (1997) 19(2):243–269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Foster P. C. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management (2003) 29(6):991–1013Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C. UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. (2002) . Analytic Technologies, Lexington, KYGoogle Scholar
• Bourgeois L. J. Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty and economic performance in volatile environments. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28(3):548–573Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois L. J., McAllister D. W., Mitchell T. R. The effects of different organizational environments upon decisions on organizational structure. Acad. Management J. (1978) 21(3):508–514Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bower G. H., Black J. B., Turner T. J. Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psych. (1979) 11(2):177–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd B. K., Fulk J. Executive scanning and perceived uncertainty: A multidimensional model. J. Management (1996) 22(1):1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd B. K., Dess G. G., Rasheed A. M. Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: Causes and consequences. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(2):204–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H., Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (2004) 49(6):795–817Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkhardt M. E., Brass D. J. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):104–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns L. R. Matrix management in hospitals: Testing theories of matrix structure and development. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(3):349–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S., Prencipe A. Making design rules: A multidomain perspective. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(2):179–189Link, Google Scholar
• Cantor N., Mischel W. Traits as prototypes: Effects of recognition memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1977) 35(1):38–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L.Organization Theory and Design (2004) 8th ed.(South-Western, Cincinnati) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Staw B., Cummings L. Information richness: A new approach to manager information processing and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior (1984) 6(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 191–233Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements: Media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 31(5):554–571Link, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Macintosh N. B. A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(2):207–224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Weick K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretive systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):284–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Day D. V., Lord R. G. Expertise and problem categorization: The role of expert processing in organizational sense-making. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29(1):35–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denison D. R., Hart S. L., Kahn J. A. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):1005–1023Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downey H. K., Slocum J. W. Uncertainty: Measures, research, and sources of variation. Acad. Management J. (1975) 18(3):562–578Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downey H. K., Hellriegel D., Slocum J. W. Individual characteristics as sources of perceived uncertainty variability. Human Relations (1977) 30(2):161–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–629Link, Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E.Social Cognition (1984) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Fombrun C. J. Strategies for network research in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1982) 7(2):280–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford R. C., Randolph W. A. Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. J. Management (1992) 18(2):267–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fry L. W., Slocum J. W. Technology, structure, and workgroup effectiveness: A test of a contingency model. Acad. Management J. (1984) 27(2):221–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R., Lorsch J., Lawrence P. Environmental and technological determinants of organizational design. Studies in Organization Design (1970) (Irwin-Dorsey, Homewood, IL) 113–139Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations (1994) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Gargiulo M., Benassi M. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(2):183–196Link, Google Scholar
• Gittell J. H. Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator of input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. (2002) 38(11):1408–1426Link, Google Scholar
• Gresov C. Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(3):431–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin A., Hauser J. R. Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering, and manufacturing: A comparison between two product teams. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):360–373Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Singh H. The architecture or cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(4):781–814Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammer M., Champy J.Reengineering the Corporation (1994) (Harper Collins, New York) Google Scholar
• Hitt M. A., Barr S. H. Managerial selection decision models: Examination of configural cue processing. J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74(1):53–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ito J., Peterson R. B. Effects of task difficulty and inter-unit interdependence on information processing systems. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(1):139–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller R. T. Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(1):167–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Sproull L. Managerial responses to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27(4):548–570Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhard D. Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Soc. Networks (1988) 10:359–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln J. Analyzing relations in dyads: Problems, models, and an application to interorganizational research. Sociol. Methods Res. (1984) 10(1):45–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden P. V. Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1990) 16:435–463Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCann J. E., Galbraith J. R., Nystrom P. C., Starbuck W. H. Interdepartmental relations. Handbook of Organizational Design (1981) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 60–84Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M. S., Marquis C. Egocentric, sociocentric, or dyadic? Identifying the appropriate level of analysis in the study of organizational networks. Soc. Networks (2006) 28(3):187–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L.Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture (1997) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J., Powell W. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(1):5–21Link, Google Scholar
• Perrow C. A. Framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1967) 32(2):194–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Provan K. G. Embeddedness, interdependence, and opportunism in organizational supplier-buyer networks. J. Management (1993) 19(4):841–856Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M., Cooke R. A. Technology and structure: The concrete, abstract, and activity systems of organizations. J. Management (1984) 10(3):345–361Google Scholar
• Schoonhoven C. B. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(3):349–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharfman M. P., Dean J. W. Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. J. Management (1991) 17(4):681–700Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha K. K., Van de Ven A. H. Designing work within and between organizations. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):389–408Link, Google Scholar
• Snyder M., Uranowitz S. W. Reconstructing the past: Some cognitive consequences of person perception. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1978) 36(9):941–950Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song X. M., Montoya-Weiss M. The effects of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):61–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa M. E., Eppinger S. D., Rowles C. M. The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1674–1689Link, Google Scholar
• Souder W. E., Sherman J. D., Woodman R., Pasmore W. Organizational design and organizational development solutions to the problem of R&D/marketing integration. Research in Organizational Change and Development (1993) 7(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 181–215Google Scholar
• Tallman S., Phene A. Leveraging knowledge across geographic boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):252–261Link, Google Scholar
• Tersine R. J.Production/Operations Management: Concepts, Structure, and Analysis (1980) (North Holland, New York) Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tichy N. M., Tushman M. L., Fombrun C. Social network analysis for organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1979) 4(4):507–519Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L. Technical communication in R&D laboratories: The impact of project work characteristics. Acad. Management J. (1978) 21(4):624–645Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L. Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: A contingency analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24(1):82–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Nadler D. A. Information processing: An integrating concept in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(4):613–624Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Pondy L., Slevin D., Killman R. Equally efficient structural variations within organizations. The Management of Organizational Design: Research and Methodology (1976) (Elsevier, New York) 155–170Google Scholar
• Victor B., Blackburn R. S. Interdependence: An alternative conceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(3):486–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R., Gordon F. M. As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):687–700Link, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P. Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers' belief structures and information processing. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(4):873–896Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Staw B. M. Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1979) 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 41–74Google Scholar
• Westerman G., McFarlan F. W., Iansiti M. Organization design and effectiveness over the innovation life cycle. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(2):230–238Link, Google Scholar