Teaching-Learning Ecologies: Mapping the Environment to Structure Through Action

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0511

References

  • Adler P. S., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. The “learning bureaucracy:” New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. Research in Organizational Behavior (1993) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 111–194Google Scholar
  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Innovation (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Barker R. G.The Stream of Behavior (1963) (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York) Google Scholar
  • Barker R. G., Wright H. F.Midwest and Its Children: The Psychological Ecology of an American Town (1955) (Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL) Google Scholar
  • Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(1):78–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Locke M., Gordon D. The social construction of a machine: Ritual, superstition, magical thinking and other pragmatic responses to running a CT scanner. Knowledge and Practice in Medicine: Social, Cultural and Historical Approaches (1988) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 497–540CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):61–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Ackroyd S., Batt R., Thompson P., Tolbert P. What we know (and mostly don't know) about technical work. The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 376–403Google Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Greenwood R., Oliver C., Suddaby R., Sahlin-Anderson K. Coalface institutionalism. Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2008) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 490–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Battilana J. Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals' social position. Organ. (2006) 13(5):653–676Google Scholar
  • Berger P. L., Luckmann T.The Social Construction of Reality (1967) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P.Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):40–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. (2001) 2(2):198–213LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burns T. R., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock Institute, London) Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J. Organization structure, environment, and performance—The role of strategic choice. Sociology (1972) 6(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook S. D. N., Brown J. S. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):381–400LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cross R., Sproull L. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):446–462LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewey J.Experience and Education (1938) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F., Sutton J. R., Meyer J. W., Scott W. R. Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. Amer. J. Soc. (1993) 99(4):265–316Google Scholar
  • Downey G. L., Donovan A., Elliott T. J., Hargens L. L., Jones R. A., Pickering A. The invisible engineer: How engineering ceased to be a problem in science and technology studies. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Science Past and Present (1989) (JAI, Greenwich, CT) 189–216Google Scholar
  • Edelman L. B., Suchman M. C. When the “haves” hold court: Speculations on the organizational internalization of law. Law Soc. Rev. (1999) 33(4):941–999CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(3):295–309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J. R.Organizational Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Garfinkel H.Studies in Ethnomethodology (1967) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Gherardi S.Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning (2006) (Blackwell, Maldern, MA) Google Scholar
  • Giddens A.New Rules of Sociological Method (1976) (Hutchinson, London) Google Scholar
  • Giddens A.The Constitution of Society (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. H. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Soc. (1977) 82(5):929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. H.Organizational Ecology (1988) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Henderson K.On Line and on Paper (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Heritage J.Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (1993) (Blackwell, London) Google Scholar
  • Hinds P., Kiesler S. Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):373–393LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchins E. Organizing work by adaptation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):14–39LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan B. Cosmopolitical obstetrics: Some insights from the training of traditional midwives. Soc. Sci. Med. (1989) 28(9):925–937CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly E., Dobbin F. Civil rights law and work: Sex discrimination and the rise of maternity leave policies. Amer. J. Soc. (1999) 105(2):455–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Carley K., Prietula M. Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. Computational Organizational Theory (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 89–111Google Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Lawrence T. B., Phillips N. From Moby Dick to Free Willy: Macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization (2004) 11(5):1350–1384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazega E., Lemercier C., Mounier L. A spinning top model of formal organization and informal behavior: Dynamics of advice networks among judges in a commercial court. Eur. Management Rev. (2006) 3(2):113–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Soc. (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Olsen J. P. The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. Eur. J. Political Res. (1975) 3(2):147–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Olsen J. P.Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (1976) (Universitetforlaget, Bergen, Norway) Google Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Soc. (1977) 83(2):340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Scott W. R., Deal T. E., Stein H. D. Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure. Organization and the Human Services (1981) (Temple University Press, Philadelphia) 151–178Google Scholar
  • Morrison E. W. Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(3):557–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orr J. E.Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (1996) (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Perlow L. A.Finding Time (1997) (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Perlow L. A. Time to coordinate: Toward an understanding of work-time standards and norms in a multicountry study of software engineers. Work Occup. (2001) 28(1):91–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow L. A., Weeks J. Who's helping whom? Layers of culture and workplace behavior. J. Organ. Behav. (2002) 23(4):354–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow L. A., Gittell J. H., Katz N. Contextualizing patterns of work group interaction: Toward a nested theory of structuration. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):520–536LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1967) 32(2):194–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Professional Engineers Act (2003) . Business and Professions Code Sections 6700–6799, California Law, http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior (1990) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 295–335Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Colyvas J. A., Greenwood R., Oliver C., Suddaby R., Sahlin-Anderson K. Microfoundations of institutional theory. Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2008) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 490–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoggen M., Barker L. S., Barker R. G., Barker R. G. Structure of behavior of American and English children. The Stream of Behavior: Exploration of Its Structure and Content (1963) (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York) 160–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoggen P.Behavior Settings: A Revision and Extension of Roger G. Barker's Ecological Psychology (1989) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
  • Schultze U., Orlikowski W. J. A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: The use of Internet-based self-serve technologies. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):87–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sole D., Edmondson A. Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. Brit. J. Management (2002) 13(2):S17–S34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suchman L. A.Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28(1):22–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaughan D.The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA (1996) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Vincenti W. G.What Engineers Know and How They Know It (1990) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore) Google Scholar
  • Wenger E.Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woodward J.Management and Technology (1958) (HMSO, London) Google Scholar
  • Yanow D., Nicolini D., Gherardi S., Yannow D. Seeing organizational learning: A cultural view. Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach (2003) (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) 32–52Google Scholar
  • Zucker L. G. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1977) 42(5):726–743CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.