When Truces Collapse: A Longitudinal Study of Price-Adjustment Routines

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0513

References

  • Argote L., Darr E., Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Repositories of knowledge in franchise organizations. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 51–68Google Scholar
  • Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(1):78–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., DiTomaso N., Bacharach S. Technology, power, and the social organization of work: Towards a pragmatic theory of skilling and deskilling. Research in the Sociology of Organizations: A Research Annual (1988) 7(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 33–80Google Scholar
  • Barley S. R. Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(3):404–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Orr J. E., Barley S. R., Orr J. E. Introduction: The neglected workforce. Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in U.S. Settings (1997) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) 1–19Google Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. (2003a) 109(3):720–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of knowledge on a production floor. Organ. Sci. (2003b) 14(3):312–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beckert J. What is sociological about economic sociology? Uncertainty and the embeddedness of economic action. Theory Soc. (1996) 25(6):803–840CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beunza D., Stark D. Tools of the trade: The socio-technology of arbitrage in a wall street trading room. Indust. Corporate Change (2004) 13(2):369–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blinder A. S., Canetti E. R. D., Lebow D. E., Rudd J. B.Asking About Prices: A New Approach to Understanding Price Stickiness (1998) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Burns J. The dynamics of accounting change inter-play between new practices, routines, institutions, power and politics. Accounting, Auditing Accountability J. (2000) 13(5):566–596CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callon M., Callon M. Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. The Laws of the Markets (1998) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) 1–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D. Reading dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(5):773–786CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., Burkhardt R., Dosi G., Egidi M., Marengo L., Warglien M. Routines and other recurring action patters of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5(3):653–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Contu A., Willmott H. Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):283–296LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Darr A.Selling Technology: The Changing Shape of Sales in an Information Economy (2006) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Dolan R. J., Simon H.Power Pricing: How Managing Price Transforms the Bottom Line (1996) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G., Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 1–24Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–629LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:94–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T., Barry D., Hansen H. Routine dynamics. The Sage Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organizations (2008) (Sage Publications, London) 302–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T., Foss N. J. Social reality, the boundaries of self-fulfilling prophecy, and economics. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(3):654–668LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ferraro F., Pfeffer J., Sutton R. I. Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):8–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferraro F., Pfeffer J., Sutton R. I. How and why theories matter: A comment on Felin and Foss (2009). Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(3):669–675LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fligstein N. Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):656–673CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank R. H., Gilovich T. D., Regan D. T. Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? J. Econom. Perspectives (1993) 7(2):159–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman M. The methodology of positive economics. Essays in Positive Economics (1953) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 3–43Google Scholar
  • Gavetti G. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capability development. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):599–617LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D., Ocasio W. Perspective: Neo-Carnegie: The carnegie school's past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):523–536LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R. Taking Coase seriously. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):145–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R. What the folk theorem doesn't tell us. Indust. Corporate Change (2006) 15(2):381–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine de Gruyter, New York) Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M., Swedberg R. Introduction to the second edition. The Sociology of Economic Life (2001) 2nd ed.(Westview Press, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
  • Hall R. L., Hitch C. J. Price theory and business behaviour. Oxford Econom. Papers (1939) 2(May):12–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Finkestein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M. A., Sing H., Teece D. J., Winter S. G.Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (2007) (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville J. A. The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):618–636LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazaric N., Raybaut A. Knowledge, hierarchy and the selection of routines: An interpretative model with group interactions. J. Evol. Econom. (2005) 15(4):393–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D., Rerup C. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):502–513LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Machlup F. Marginal analysis and empirical research. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1946) 36(4):519–554Google Scholar
  • Machlup F. Theories of the firm: Marginalist, behavioral, managerial. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1967) 57(1):1–33Google Scholar
  • MacKenzie D., Millo Y. Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. (2003) 109(1):107–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mangolte P. A. Organisational learning and the organisational link: The problem of conflict, political equilibrium and truce. Eur. J. Econom. Soc. Systems (2000) 14(2):173–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Footnotes to organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(4):563–577CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer J. Sociol. (1977) 83(2):340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94(Supplement):S154–S179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mills C. W. Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1940) 5(6):904–913CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monroe K. D.Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions (2002) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nagle T. T.The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing: A Guide to Profitable Decision Making (1987) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of the Firm (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Pashigian B. P.Price Theory and Its Applications (1998) (Irwin/McGraw Hill, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(5):793–815CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quinn R. W., Worline M. C. Enabling courageous collective action: Conversations from United Airlines flight 93. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(4):497–516LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C. Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(5):876–893LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C., Feldman M. Trial-and-error learning in routines as a source of change in organizational schema. Acad. Management J. (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Rotemberg J., Saloner G. Overt interfunctional conflict (and its reduction through business strategy). RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(4):630–653CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salvato C. Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):384–409LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spradley J. P.The Ethnographic Interview (1979) (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sullivan B. N. Competition and beyond: Problems and attention allocation in the organizational rulemaking process. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(2):432–450LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G., Dosi G., Nelson R., Winter S. Appropriability and the challenge of scope: Banc One routinizes replication. The Nature and Dynamics of Routines (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 69–98Google Scholar
  • White H. C., Leinhardt S. L. Production markets as induced role structures. Sociological Methodology (1981) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 1–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zbaracki M. J. A sociological view of costs of price adjustment: Contributions from grounded theory methods. Managerial Decision Econom. (2007) 28(6):553–567CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zbaracki M. J., Ritson M., Levy D., Dutta S., Bergen M. Managerial and customer dimensions of the costs of price adjustment: Direct evidence from industrial markets. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2004) 86(2):514–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Winter S. Deliberative learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–351LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.