Dynamic Managerial Capabilities and the Multibusiness Team: The Role of Episodic Teams in Executive Leadership Groups

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0515

References

  • Adner R., Helfat C. E. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):1011–1025CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amason A. C. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving paradox for top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(1):123–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andriopoulos C., Lewis M. W. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):696–717LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Augier M., Teece D. J. Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):410–421LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnard C. I.The Functions of the Executive (1938) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bartel C. A., Saavedra R. The collective construction of work group moods. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(2):197–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):238–256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M., Schoar A. Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(4):1169–1208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettis R. A. Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms. Strategic Management J. (1981) 2(4):379–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M.Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Boeker W. Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product-market entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(2):213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P.Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois L. J. Performance and consensus. Strategic Management J. (1980) 1(3):227–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman E. H., Helfat C. E. Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(1):1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M.Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter M. A., Geletkanycz M. A., Sanders W. G. Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Management (2004) 30(6):749–778CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castanias R. P., Helfat C. E. Managerial resources and rents. J. Management (1991) 17(1):155–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castanias R. P., Helfat C. E. The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. J. Management (2001) 27(6):661–678CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Chandler A. D. The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:31–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J. Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology (1972) 6(1):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen S. G., Bailey D. E. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management (1997) 23(3):239–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collis D. J. How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(8):143–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conant J. S., Mokwa M. P., Varadarajan P. R. Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures-based study. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11(5):365–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis R., Thomas L. G. Direct estimation of synergy: A new approach to the diversity-performance debate. Management Sci. (1993) 39(11):1334–1346LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dess G. G., Robinson Jr R. B. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5(3):265–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Ashford S. J., O'Neill R. M., Hayes E., Wierba E. E. Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management J. (1997) 23(11):1019–1031Google Scholar
  • Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989a) 32(3):543–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989b) 14(4):532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Bourgeois L. J. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(4):737–770CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Galunic D. C. Coevolving: At last, a way to make synergies work. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(1):91–101Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Graebner M. E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(1):25–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1105–1121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment and growth among U. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(3):504–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):136–150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Kahwajy J. L., Bourgeois L. J. Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. Calif. Management Rev. (1997) 39(2):42–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenmann T. R., Bower J. L. The entrepreneurial M-form: Strategic integration in global media firms. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(3):348–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson R. M. Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1962) 27(1):31–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foushee H. C. Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance. Amer. Psych. (1984) 39(8):885–893CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson J. W., Mitchell T. R. Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Acad. Management J. (1984) 27(2):399–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeland R. F. The myth of the M-form? Governance, consent, and organizational change. Amer. J. Sociol. (1996) 102(2):483–527CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J. R.Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):255–282LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1229–1249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galunic D. C., Rodan S. Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(12):1193–1201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick C. J. G. Time and transition in work teams. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(1):9–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert C. G. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):741–763CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gimeno J., Woo C. Y. Multimarket contact, economies of scope, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(3):239–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Goold M., Alexander M., Campbell A.Corporate-Level Strategy: Creating Value in the Multibusiness Company (1994) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Govindarajan V., Fisher J. Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: Effects on business-unit performance. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(2):259–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graebner M. E. Momentum and serindipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(8/9):751–777CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruenfeld D. H., Mannix E. A., Williams K. Y., Neale M. A. Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 67(1):1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(4):619–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K. SBU strategies, corporate-SBU relations, and SBU effectiveness in strategy implementation. Acad. Management J. (1987) 30(3):477–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Resource sharing among SBUs: Strategic antecedents and administrative implications. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(4):695–714CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R.Groups That Work (And Those That Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork (1990) 1st ed.(Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. Research in Organizational Behavior (1994) 15(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 171–214Google Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Mason P. C. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):193–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Finkelstein S., Mooney A. C. Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(3):472–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49(2):149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A. Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(1):20–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heath C., Staudenmayer N. Coordination neglect: How lay theories or organizing complicate coordination in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. (2000) 22:155–193Google Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Eisenhardt K. M. Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(13):1217–1232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M. A., Singh H., Teece D. J., Winter S. G. Dynamic capabilities: Foundations. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (2007a) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 1–18Google Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M. A., Singh H., Teece D. J., Winter S. G.Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (2007b) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L., Hitt M. A., Hoskisson R. E. Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(4):501–521LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., Power D. J. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6(2):171–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huff A. S.Mapping Strategic Thought (1990) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
  • Huy Q. N. Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(1):39–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iansiti M., Clark K. B. Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3(3):557–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson S. E. Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. Adv. Strategic Management (1992) 8:345–382Google Scholar
  • James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69(1):85–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78(2):306–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K. A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):256–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K. A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(3):530–557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M., Zajac E. J. Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(6):507–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jick T. D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24(4):602–611CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson D. R., Hoopes D. G. Managerial cognition, sunk costs, and the evolution of industry structure. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):1057–1068CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr J. L. Strategies and managerial rewards: An empirical study. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28(1):155–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirzner I. M.Competition and Entrepreneurship (1973) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Kor Y. Y., Mahoney J. T., Michael S. C. Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. J. Management Stud. (2007) 44(7):1187–1212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korsgaard M. A., Schweiger D. M., Sapienza H. J. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):60–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotter J. P.The General Managers (1982) (Free Press, Collier Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kramer R. M. Revisiting the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam decisions 25 years later: How well has the Groupthink hypothesis stood the test of time? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1998) 73(2, 3):236–271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer R. M. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999) 50(1):569–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lambert R. A., Larcker D. F., Weigelt K. The structure of organizational incentives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):438–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(4):691–710CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence B. S. The black box of organizational demography. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(1):1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1519–1533LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating factor of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21(4):384–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipton J. P. On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. J. Appl. Psych. (1977) 62(1):90–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Galunic D. C., Schneider S. Balancing cooperation and competition in human groups: The role of emotional algorithms and evolution. Managerial Decision Econom. (2006) 27(2/3):217–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin J. A., Eisenhardt K. M. Creating cross-business-unit collaborations in multi-business organizations. Acad. Management J. (2010) 53(2):265–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miller C. C., Cardinal L. B., Glick W. H. Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(1):189–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H.The Nature of Managerial Work (1973) (Harper, Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H., McHugh A. Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30(2):160–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitroff I. I. Myth of objectivity or why science needs a new psychology of science. Management Sci. (1972) 18(10):613–618LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery C. A. Product market diversification and market power. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28(4):789–798CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery C. A. Corporate diversification. J. Econom. Perspect. (1994) 8(3):163–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Res. Organ. Behav. (2008) 28:105–206Google Scholar
  • O'Reilly C. A., Caldwell D. F., Barnett W. P. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(1):21–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J. Managing laboratory work through skepticism: Processes of evaluation and control. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2001) 66(3):427–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palich L. E., Cardinal L. B., Miller C. C. Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(2):155–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patton M. Q.Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (2002) 3rd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Peterson R. S., Martorana P. V., Smith D. B., Owens P. D. The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):795–808CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. M. Logitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(3):267–292LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. M. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management J. (1992a) 13(8):163–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. M. The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management J. (1992b) 13(8):5–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J. Organization theory and structural perspectives on management. J. Management (1991) 17(4):789–803CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper, Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Priem R. L., Lyon D. W., Dess G. G. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. J. Management (1999) 25(6):935–953CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roquebert J. A., Phillips R. L., Westfall P. A. Markets vs. management: What “drives” profitability. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(8):653–664CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rumelt R. P.Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance (1974) (Harvard University Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Schilling M. A. Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(2):387–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B., Eisenhardt K. M., Lyman K. Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):177–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sewell W. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Soc. (1992) 98(July):1–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw M. E., Robbin R., Belser J. R.Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior (1981) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N. Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(1):125–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith K. G., Smith K. A., Sims H. P., O'Bannon D. P., Scully J. A., Olian J. D. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):412–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Somaya D., Teece D., Sheshinski E., Strom R. J., Baumol W. J. Patents, licensing and entrepreneurship: Effectuating innovation in multi-invention contexts. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and the Growth Mechanism of the Free-Enterprise Economies (2007) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 185–212Google Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Sandelands L. E., Dutton J. E. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(4):501–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A. L., Corbin J. M.Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Sundaramurthy C., Lewis M. W. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(3):397–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tanriverdi H., Venkatraman N. Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(2):97–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor A., Helfat C. E. Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):718–739LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1980) 1:293–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(13):1319–1350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thompson L. L.Making the Team: A Guide for Managers (2004) 2nd ed.(Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):464–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van De Ven A. H. Suggestions for studying strategy process. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(5):169–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wageman R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):145–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5(2):171–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • West C. T., Schwenk C. R. Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance: A report of resounding nonfindings. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(7):571–676CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams K. Y., O'Reilly C. A. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. (1998) 20:77–140Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (1985) (Free Press, Collier Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Economic Organization: Firms, Markets, and Policy Control (1986) (New York University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Mechanisms of Governance (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):991–995CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wrzesniewski A., Dutton J. E., Debebe G. Interpersonal sensemaking and the meaning of work. Res. Organ. Behav. (2003) 25:93–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2003) 3rd ed.(Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Young G., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. “Austrian” and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):243–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–351LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.