Firm Size and Industry Structure Under Human Capital Intensity: Insights from the Evolution of the Global Advertising Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0518

References

  • Advertising Age EWRR buy makes interpublic first agency to near half-billion mark. (1963a) October 14):1Google Scholar
  • Advertising Age FC&B planning to offer agency stock to public. (1963b) June 24):1Google Scholar
  • Advertising Age Agency report. (2002) April 22):1–59Google Scholar
  • Arzaghi M., Berndt E. R., Davis J. C., Silk A. J. Economic factors underlying the unbundling of advertising agency services. (2008) . Working Paper 14345, NBER, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G. P. Beatrice: A study in the creation and destruction of value. J. Finance (1992) 47(3):1081–1120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Chang H., Cunningham R. The public accounting industry production function. J. Accounting Econom. (2003) 35(2):255–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bojanek R. Merger activity in the advertising industry. (1980) . Unpublished master's thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Bower J. L. WPP–Integrating icons. (1997) Case 9-397-504, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Business Week How Madison Avenue views its own big sell. (1964) May 2):72–78Google Scholar
  • Caves R. E.Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (1996) 2nd ed.(Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Collis D. Saatchi & Saatchi Company PLC: Corporate strategy. (1995) . Teaching Note, Case 9-792-056, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Cook C., Nohria N. Hill, Holliday, Connors, Cosmopulos, Inc. advertising (A). (1991) . Case 9-491-016, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Craswell A. T., Francis J. R., Taylor S. L. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specialization. J. Accounting Econom. (1995) 20(3):297–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doogar R., Easley R. F. Concentration without differentiation: A new look at the determinants of audit market concentration. J. Accounting Econom. (1998) 25:235–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dow G. K.Governing the Firm: Worker's Control in Theory and Practice (2003) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dow G. K., Putterman L. Why capital suppliers (usually) hire workers: What we know and what we need to know. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2000) 43:319–336CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elliott S. Advertising's big four: It's their world now. New York Times (2002) March 31):B1Google Scholar
  • Fendley A.Saatchi & Saatchi: The Inside Story (1996) (Arcade, New York) Google Scholar
  • Galanter M., Palay T.Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm (1990) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Garicano L., Hubbard T. Managerial leverage is limited by the extent of the market: Hierarchies, specialization, and the utilization of lawyers' human capital. J. Law Econom. (2007) 50(1):1–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garicano L., Hubbard T. Specialization, firms, and markets: The division of labor within and between law firms. J. Law Econom. Organ. (2009) 25(2):339–371CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P., Khanna T. The nature of diversified business groups: A research design and two case studies. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 44(1):35–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Empson L. The professional partnership: Relic or exemplary form of governance? Organ. Stud. (2003) 24(6):909–933CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Hinings C. R., Brown J. “P2-Form” Strategic management: Corporate practices in professional service firms. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(4):725–755CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Suddaby R., McDougald M., Greenwood R., Suddaby R. Introduction. Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Professional Service Firms (2006) 24(Elsevier JAI Press, Oxford, UK) 1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groesbeck K. At last! Own a share of America's most glamorous business! Advertising Age (1962) July 2):53Google Scholar
  • Han S.-K. Mimetic isomorphism and its effect on the audit services market. Soc. Forces (1994) 73(2):637–664CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansmann H.The Ownership of Enterprise (1996) (Belknap Harvard, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hart O.Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure (1995) (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard R. G., Palia D. A re-examination of the conglomerate merger wave in the 1960s: An internal capital markets view. J. Finance (1999) 54(3):1131–1152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ireland J., Lennox C. S. The large audit firm fee premium: A case of selectivity bias? J. Accounting, Auditing, Finance (2002) 17(1):73–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M., Meckling W. Rights and production functions: An application to labor-managed firms and codetermination. J. Bus. (1979) 52(4):469–506CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khermouch G. Interpublic group: Synergy—Or sinkhole? Business Week (2003) April 23):76–77Google Scholar
  • King C. I., Silk A. J., Ketelhohn N. Geographic concentration, knowledge spillovers, and growth in the evolution of the U.S. advertising agency industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2003) 12(3):327–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S. Entry, exit, growth and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(3):562–583Google Scholar
  • Krotman M., Sinkin J. The state of consolidation of accounting firms. CPA J. (2000) . http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2000/0800/features/f83100a.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J. Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. J. Finance (1995) 50(1):301–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lorsch J., Tierney T.Aligning the Stars: How to Succeed When Professionals Drive Results (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Lowendahl B.Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms (2000) (Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen) Google Scholar
  • Mailath G. J., Postlewaite A. Workers versus firms: Bargaining over a firm's value. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1990) 57(3):369–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michell P.Advertising Agency-Client Relations: A Strategic Perspective (1988) (Croom Helm, London) Google Scholar
  • Millman N.Emperors of Adland (1988) (Warner Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nachum L.The Origins of the International Competitiveness of Firms (1999) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nanda A. Professional codes of ethics. (2002) . Case 03-064, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Nanda A. Managing client conflict. (2004) . Working Paper 9-904-059, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • O'Connell V. Madison Avenue lacks the urge to merge, despite Publicis deal. Wall Street J. (2002) March 20):B4Google Scholar
  • Powell M. J., Brock D. M., Hinings C. R., Brock D. M., Powell M. J., Hinings C. R. The changing professional organization. Restructuring the Professional Organization: Accounting, Healthcare, and Law (1999) (Routledge, New York) 1–19Google Scholar
  • Printer's Ink Going public: What it means to agencies. (1962) 279(36, May 25):37–39Google Scholar
  • Printer's Ink Wall Streeter looks at agency stocks. (1964) October 9):8–9Google Scholar
  • Rajan R., Zingales L. Power in a theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113(2):387–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajan R., Zingales L., Vives X. Governance of the new enterprise. Corporate Governance: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 201–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ritter J. Initial public offerings? Contemporary Finance Digest (1998) 2(1):5–30Google Scholar
  • Ritter J., Welch I. A review of IPO activity, pricing and allocations. J. Finance (2002) 57(4):1795–1828CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose T., Hinings C. R., Brock D. M., Powell M. J., Hinings C. R. Global client's demands driving change in global business advisory firms. Restructuring the Professional Organization (1999) (Routledge, New York) 41–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothenberg R.Where the Suckers Moon (1994) (Vintage Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sanders L. Stuck in the middle. Advertising Age (2002) 73(10)March 11:43Google Scholar
  • Schmalensee R., Silk A. J., Bojanek R. The impact of scale and media mix on advertising agency costs. J. Bus. (1983) 56(4):453–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaked A., Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49:3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silk A., Berndt E. Scale and scope effects on advertising agency costs. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):53–72LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Silk A., Berndt E. Costs, institutional mobility barriers, and market structure: Advertising agencies as multiproduct firms. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 3(3):437–480CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silk A., Berndt E. Holding company cost economies in the global advertising and marketing services business. Rev. Marketing Sci. (2004) 2(1). Article 5CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silk A., King C. I. Concentration levels in the US advertising and marketing services industry: Myth vs. reality. (2008) . Working Paper 09-044, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Spar D. L. Lawyers abroad: The internationalization of legal practice. Calif. Management Rev. (1997) 39(3):8–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck W. Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29(6):713–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sullivan M. W. The effect of the Big Eight accounting firm mergers on the market for audit services. J. Law Econom. (2002) 45(2):375–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton J.Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising and the Evolution of Concentration (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sutton J.Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • von Nordenflycht A. Lawyers, incorporated? Financial Post (2009) January 20). Accessed March 11, 2010, http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=1196263Google Scholar
  • Vranica S. MDC is on the hunt for ad agencies. Wall Street J. (2003) December 3):B6Google Scholar
  • West D. Multinational competition in the British advertising agency business, 1936–1987. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1988) 62(3):467–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young E. Heller Ehrman hit by defections, failed Mayer Brown merger. San Francisco Bus. Times (2008) September 17). Accessed March 11, 2010, http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2008/09/15/daily50.htmlGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.