Where Do Creative Interactions Come From? The Role of Tie Content and Social Networks

References

• Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Amabile T.Creativity in Context (1996) (West View Press, Inc., Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
• Amabile T., Goldfarb P., Brackfield S. Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Res. J. (1990) 3:6–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T., Barsade S., Mueller J., Staw B. Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(3):367–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum C.An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata (2006) (Stata Press Books, College Station, TX) Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Structural Holes, The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psych. Rev. (1960) 67:380–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M., Sternberg R. J. Society, culture, and person: A system view of creativity. The Nature of Creativity (1988) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 325–339Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M.Creativity (1996) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
• Dekker D., Krackhardt D., Snijders T. Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychomatrika (2007) 72(4):563–581Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finke R., Ward T., Smith S.Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Sorenson O. Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy (2001) 30(7):1019–1039Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Mingo S., Chen D. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2007) 52(3):443–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L., Romney A., Freeman S. Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. Amer. Anthropologist (1987) 89:310–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Gardner H.Creating Minds (1993) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Gargiulo M., Benassi M. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(2):183–196Link, Google Scholar
• Girotra K., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. (2010) 56(4):591–605Link, Google Scholar
• Goodman L. Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1979) 74(367):537–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman L.The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered Categories (1984) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guildford J. P. Creativity. Amer. Psychologist (1950) 5:444–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A., Bechky B. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):484–500Link, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A., Sutton R. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):716–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad. Management J. (1993) 38(3):471–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isen A., Russ S. E. On the relationship between affect and creative problem solving. Affect, Creative Experience and Psychological Adjustment (1999) (Brunner/Mazel, Philadelphia) 3–18Google Scholar
• Janis I. L.Victims of Groupthink (1972) (Houghton Mifflin, New York) Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Soc. Networks (1988) 10(4):359–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labianca G., Brass D., Gray B. Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(1):55–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin D. Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1477–1490Link, Google Scholar
• Lincoln J. Analyzing relations in dyads: Problems, models, and an application to interorganizational research. Sociol. Methods Res. (1984) 13(1):45–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madjar N., Oldham G., Pratt M. There's no place like home? The contribution of work and nonwork creativity support to employees' creative performance. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(4):757–767Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden P. V. Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1990) 16:435–463Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden P. V., Campbell K. E. Measuring tie strength. Soc. Forces (1984) 63(2):482–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFayden M. A., Semadeni M., Cannella A. A. Value of strong ties to disconnect others: Examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(3):552–564Link, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D. Social networks, the Tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(1):100–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborn A. F.Applied Imagination (1953) (Scribner's, New York) Google Scholar
• Parachuri S. Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: A longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(1):63–80Link, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith J. E. Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(1):85–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith J. E., Shalley C. E. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(1):89–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P., Organ D. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R. Preferences, identity, and competition: Predicting tie strength from demographic data. Management Sci. (2005) 51(9):1374–1383Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repenning N. A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(2):109–127Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts P. W., Amit R. The dynamics of innovative activity and competitive advantage: The case of Australian retail banking, 1981 to 1995. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):107–122Link, Google Scholar
• Rodan S., Galunic C. More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(6):541–562Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonton D. K.Scientific Genius: A Psychology of Science (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Simonton D. K.Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Sosa M. E., Eppinger S. D., Rowles C. M. The misalignment of product and organizational structures in complex product development. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1674–1689Link, Google Scholar
• Sternberg R.The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Sternberg R. B.Handbook of Creativity (1999) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Stuart T. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(3):668–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton R., Hargadon A. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(4):685–718Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):9–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thibaut J. W., Kelley H. H.The Social Psychology of Groups (1986) (Transaction, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ) . (Orig. pub. 1959.)Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Torrance E. P. Influence of dyadic interaction in creativity functioning. Psych. Rep. (1970) 26:391–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torrance E. P. Stimulation, enjoyment and originality in dyadic creativity. J. Ed. Psych. (1971) 62(1):45–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M. The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: External knowledge, social networks, and individual innovativeness. (2005) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B., Spiro J. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 111(2):447–504Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis (1994) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams R. L. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics (2000) 56(2):645–646Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodman R. W., Sawyer J., Griffin W. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(2):293–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis Cross-Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):76–92Link, Google Scholar