Taking Sides: The Interactive Influences of Institutional Mechanisms on the Adoption of Same-Sex Partner Health Benefits by Fortune 500 Corporations, 1990–2003

References

• Adams J. S., Solomon T. A.Domestic Partner Benefits: An Employer's Guide (2000) (Thompson Publishing Group, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Allison P., Hardy M., Bryman A. Event history analysis. Handbook of Data Analysis (2004) (Sage, London) 369–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anfuso D. Consider cost, controls and reasons for implementing domestic-partner benefits. Personnel J. (1995) 74(2):97Google Scholar
• Badgett M. V. L. Calculating costs with credibility: Health care benefits for domestic partners. Angles (2000) 5(1):1–8Google Scholar
• Baker S., Judge P. It sees same-sex benefits as a low-cost way to draw top talent. Business Week(October 7):39Google Scholar
• Bansal P., Clelland I. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(1):93–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(1):37–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns L. R., Wholey R. D. Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organization characteristics and interorganizational networks. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(1):106–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Button S. B. Organizational efforts to affirm sexual diversity: A cross-level examination. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):17–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Button J. M., Rienzo B. A., Wald K. D., Rimmerman C. A., Wald K. D., Wilcox C. The politics of gay rights at the local and state level. Politics of Gay Rights (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 269–289Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran R. Same-sex partners win IBM coverage; benefits milestone hailed by activists. Washington Post(September 20):A01Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2003) 3rd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Dacin M. T. Isomorphism in context: The power and prescription of institutional norms. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(1):46–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dacin M. T., Goodstein J., Scott W. R. Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):45–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F., Greve H. R. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. (1997) 103(1):1–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse D. Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource based theories. J. Management (2000) 26(6):1091–1112Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman L. B. Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. Amer. J. Sociol. (1992) 97(6):1531–1576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman L. B., Suchman M. C. The legal environments of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1997) 23:479–515Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmonds P., Jones J. H. County stands its moral ground—Con- troversy swirls over gay rights. USA Today(December 2):2AGoogle Scholar
• Elsbach K. D. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(1):57–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldblum C. R., D'Emillio J., William T. B., Vald U. The federal gay rights bill: From BELLA to ENDA. Creating Change: Sexuality, Public Policy, and Civil Rights (2000) (St. Martin's Press, New York) 149–187Google Scholar
• Friedland R., Alford R. R., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 232–261Google Scholar
• Gitlin T.The Whole World Is Watching (1980) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
• Gossett C. W. Domestic partnership benefits. Rev. Public Personnel Admin. (1994) 14(1):64–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(4):1022–1054Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Suddaby R., Hinings C. R. Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutional fields. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):58–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Oliver C., Sahlin K., Suddaby R., Greenwood R., Oliver C., Sahlin K., Suddaby R. Introduction. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2008) (Sage, London) 1–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith K. H., Hebl M. R. The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: “Coming out” at work. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(6):1191–1199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H. A., Rao H. Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (1997) 102(6):1606–1651Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helitzer J. B. Health care coverage for domestic partners. Benefits Law J. (1993) 6(2):245–257Google Scholar
• Herek G. M. The context of anti-gay violence. J. Interpersonal Violence (1990) 5(3):316–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herek G. M. Beyond “homophobia”: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Res. Sociol. Policy (2004) 1(2):6–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herman D., Rimmerman C. A., Wald K. D., Wilcox C. The gay agenda is the devil's agenda: The Christian right's vision and the role of the state. Politics of Gay Rights (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 139–160Google Scholar
• Herrschaft D., Mills K. I.The State of the Workplace for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Americans 2002 (2002) (Human Rights Campaign, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Hirsch P. M. From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration. Amer. J. Sociol. (1986) 91(3):800–837Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman A. J. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(4):351–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hostetler D., Pynes J. E. Domestic partnership benefits: Dispelling the myth. Rev. Public Personnel Admin. (1995) 15(1):41–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hudson B. A. Against all odds: A consideration of core-stigmatized organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2008) 33(1):252–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hudson B. A., Okhuysen G. A. Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer and improbable persistence of men's bathhouses. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(1):134–153Link, Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Simons T. Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(5):1466–1482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis I. L., Fader R., Lasswell H., Leites N. The coefficient of imbalance. Language of Politics (1965) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 153–169Google Scholar
• Johnston D., Malina M. A. Managing sexual orientation diversity: The impact on firm value. Group Organ. Management (2008) 33(5):602–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane S. W. Proposal for a model employee benefits program: Responding to the changing trends in society. Benefits Quart. (1998) 14(2):25–38Google Scholar
• Kelly E., Dobbin F. Civil rights law at work: Sex discrimination and the rise of maternity leave policies. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105(2):455–492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P.A Guide to Econometrics (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Kennedy M. T., Fiss P. C. Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U.S. hospitals. Acad. Management J. (2009) 52(5):897–918Crossref, Google Scholar
• King T. R. Office at Disney broadens definition of family—Quiet policy change extends coverage ot the partners of gay, lesbian workers. Wall Street Journal (1995) October 6):B8Google Scholar
• Kraatz M. S., Moore J. H. Executive migration and institutional change. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):120–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz M. S., Zajac E. J. Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(5):812–836Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee G. K., Paruchuri S. Entry into emergent and uncertain product-markets: The role of associative rhetoric. Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(6):1171–1188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loftus J. America's liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2001) 66(5):762–782Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M. Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):29–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maguire S., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(5):657–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAdam D., Scott W. R., David G. F., McAdam D., Scott W. R., Zald M. N. Organizations and movements. Social Movements and Organization Theory (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 4–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M. S., Fein L. C. The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(4):653–683Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan B. C. Adopting Lawrence: Lawrence v. Texas and discriminatory adoption laws. Emory Law J. (2004) 53(3):1491–1531Google Scholar
• O'Leary J., D'Emillio J., William T. B., Vald U. From agitator to insider: Fighting for inclusion in democratic party. Creating Change: Sexuality, Public Policy, and Civil Rights (2000) (St. Martin's Press, New York) 81–114Google Scholar
• Oliver C. The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organ. Stud. (1992) 13(4):563–588Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer D. A., Jennings P. D., Zhou X. Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(1):100–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinsky M. I. Baptists release book on boycott the 88-page send a message to Mickey details the denomination's gripes against Disney. Orlando Sentinel (1998) June 9):A9Google Scholar
• Pollock T. G., Rindova V. P. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(5):631–642Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raeburn N. C.Lesbian and Gay Workplace Rights: Changing Corporate America from Inside Out (2004) (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis) Google Scholar
• Ragins B. R., Cornwell J. M. Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(6):1244–1261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins B. R., Cornwell J. M., Miller J. S. Heterosexism in the workplace: Do race and gender matter? Group Organ. Management (2003) 28(1):45–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H., Sivakumar K. Institutional sources of boundary-spanning structures: The establishment of investor relations departments in the Fortune 500 industrials. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):27–42Link, Google Scholar
• Sanders W. M. G., Tuschke A. C. The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(1):33–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Seo M. G., Creed W. E. D. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):222–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine W. D., David R. J., Mitsuhashi H. From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organ. Sci. (2008) 18(4):578–594Link, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Epstein L. D. What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(3):523–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton J. R., Dobbin F. The two faces of governance: Responses to legal uncertainty in U.S. firms, 1955–1985. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(5):794–811Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton P. The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):81–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. S. Institutional sources of change in the formal structures of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28(1):22–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhovek S. H. Texas county retreats over Apple's gay policy. New York Times (1993) December 8):A18Google Scholar
• Washington M. M., Ventresca J. How organizations change: The role of institutional support mechanisms in the incorporation of higher education visibility strategies, 1874–1995. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(1):82–97Link, Google Scholar
• Weber R. P.Basic Content Analysis (1991) 2nd ed.(Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Westphal J. D., Gulati R., Shortell S. M. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(2):366–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilke M. Commercial closet report: Coors print campaign reframes longstanding issues. (2002) . Retrieved November 16, 2002, http://www.hrc.org/worknet/workalert/2002/0510/article01.aspGoogle Scholar
• Zilber T. B. Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):234–254Crossref, Google Scholar