Too Good to Be True? The Unintended Signaling Effects of Educational Prestige on External Expectations of Team Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0523

References

  • Ancona D. G. Outward bound—Strategies for team survival in an organization. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(2):334–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(4):634–665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G. S.Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (1964) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Berger J., Fisek M. H. Consistent and inconsistent status characteristics and determination of power and prestige orders. Sociometry (1970) 33(3):287–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Cohen B. P., Zelditch Jr M. Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1972) 37(3):241–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M., Mullainathan S. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(4):991–1013CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braddock J., Crain R., McPartland J., Dawkins R. Applicant race and job placement decisions: A national survey experiment. Internat. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy (1986) 6(1):3–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brezina T., Winder K. Economic disadvantage, status generalization, and negative racial stereotyping by white Americans. Soc. Psych. Quart. (2003) 66(4):402–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgoon J. K., Burgoon M., Robinson W. P., Giles H. Expectancy theories. The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (2001) (John Wiley & Sons, London) 79–102Google Scholar
  • Cabrera S. F., Sauer S. J., Thomas-Hunt M. C. The evolving manager stereotype: The effects of industry gender-typing on performance expectations for leaders and their teams. Psych. Women Quart. (2009) 33(4):419–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castilla E. Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. Amer. J. Sociol. (2008) 113(6):1479–1526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correll S. J., Bernard S., Paik I. Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? Amer. J. Sociol. (2007) 112(5):1297–1338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox T. H., Nkomo S. M. Differential appraisal criteria based on the race of the ratee. Group Organ. Stud. (1986) 11:101–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox T. H., Lobel S. A., McLeod P. L. Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(4):827–847CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crosby F. J.Affirmative Action Is Dead; Long Live Affirmative Action (2004) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Curry G. E.The Affirmative Action Debate (1996) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dovidio J. F., Gaertner S. L. Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psych. Sci. (2000) 11(4):315–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dovidio J. F., Gaertner S. L., Bachman B. A., Turner M. E. Racial bias in organizations: The role of group processes in its causes and cures. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 415–444Google Scholar
  • Edley C., Jr.Not All Black and White: Affirmative Action and American Values (1996) (Hill and Wang, New York) Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:504–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elvira M., Town R. The effects of race and worker productivity on performance evaluations. Indust. Relations (2001) 40(4):571–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn F. J., Staw B. M. Lend me your wallets: The effect of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(4):309–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn F. J., Chatman J. A., Spataro S. E. Getting to know you: The influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different people in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(3):414–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia L. T., Erskine N., Hawn K., Casmay S. R. The effect of affirmative action on attributions about minority group members. J. Personality (1981) 49(4):427–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R.A Primer in Game Theory (1992) (Harvester Wheatsheaf, London) Google Scholar
  • Gladstein D. L. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(4):499–517CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenhaus J. H., Parasuraman S., Wormley W. M. Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(1):64–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwald A. G., Banaji M. R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psych. Rev. (1995) 102(1):4–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hacker A.Two Nations: Black and White, Separate, Hostile, and Unequal (1992) (Charles Scribner's Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):193–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82(5):929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D. A., Price K. H., Bell M. P. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effect of surface- versus deep-level diversity on group cohesiveness. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(1):96–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D. A., Kravitz D. A., Mayer D. M., Leslie L. M., Lev-Arey D. Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. J. Appl. Psych. (2006) 91(5):1013–1036CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hastie R. Causes and effects of causal attribution. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1984) 46(1):44–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heilman M. E., Blader S. L. Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: The effects of gender rarity. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(2):188–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heilman M. E., Block C. J., Stathatos P. The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(3):603–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hilton D. J., Slugoski B. R. Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psych. Rev. (1986) 93(1):75–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt M. A., Bierman L., Shimizu K., Kochhar R. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):13–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B., Fraidin S. N. Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2003) 39(4):355–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnston W. B. Global work force 2000: The new world labor-market. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1991) 69(2):115–127Google Scholar
  • Keck S. Top management team structure: Differential effects by environmental context. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(2):143–156LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kraiger K., Ford J. K. A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. J. Appl. Psych. (1985) 70(1):56–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer R. M., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behaviour (1991) 13(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 191–228Google Scholar
  • Lau D. C., Murnighan J. K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):325–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12(1):1–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lefkowitz J. Sex-related differences in job attitudes and dispositional variables: Now you see them, …. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(2):323–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonhardt D. Who's in the corner office? New York Times (2005) November 27, Section 3):1Google Scholar
  • Milliken F. J., Martins L. L. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(2):402–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. Organizational context and characteristics and tenure of hospital administrators. Acad. Management J. (1977) 20(1):74–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips D. J. The promotion paradox: Organizational mortality and employee promotion chances in Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(4):1058–1098CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pugh M. D., Wahrman R. Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? Amer. J. Sociol. (1983) 88(4):746–762CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pulakos E. D., White L. A., Oppler S. H., Borman W. C. Examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings. J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74(5):770–780CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quillian L., Pager D. Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107(3):717–767CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R. E., Zuckerman E. W. Networks, diversity and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):502–517LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. Status in groups: The importance of motivation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1982) 47(1):76–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Correll S. J. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on cultural beliefs and social relations. Gender Soc. (2004) 18(4):510–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Erickson K. G. Creating and spreading status beliefs. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106(3):579–615CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosette A., Leonardelli G. J., Phillips K. W. The white standard: Racial bias in leader categorization. J. Appl. Psych. (2008) 93(4):758–777CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sackett P. R., Dubois C. L. Z. Rater–ratee race effects on performance evaluation: Challenging meta-analytic conclusions. J. Appl. Psych. (1991) 76(6):873–877CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (1992) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Shackelford S., Wood W., Worchel S. Behavioral styles and the influence of women in mixed-sex groups. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1996) 59(3):284–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sniderman P., Piazza T.The Scar of Race (1993) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sommers S. R. On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2006) 90(4):597–612CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M. Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. (1973) 87(3):355–379CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stauffer J. M., Buckley M. R. The existence and nature of racial bias in supervisory ratings. J. Appl. Psych. (2005) 90(3):586–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas D. A., Gabarro J. J.Breaking Through: The Making of Minority Executives in Corporate America (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Thomas M. E., Horton H. D. Race, class, and family structure: The case of family income. Sociol. Perspectives (1992) 35(3):433–450CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tomaskovic-Devey D., Thomas M., Johnson K. Race and the accumulation of human capital over the career: A theoretical model and fixed effects application. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 111(1):58–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsui A. S., Egan T. D., O'Reilly C. A. Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(4):549–579CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Unzueta M. M., Lowery B. S., Knowles E. D. How believing in affirmative action quotas protects white men's self-esteem. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2008) 105(1):1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. News & World Report America's Best Colleges 2005. U.S. News & World Report (2004) 137(6):64–67Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. An appreciation of social context: One legacy of Gerald Salancik. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(4):563–573CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiner B. “Spontaneous” causal thinking. Psych. Bull. (1985) 97(1):74–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams K. Y., O'Reilly c. A., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior (1998) 20(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 77–140Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.