Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines

References

• Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. I. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):43–68Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G., Katila R. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(3):197–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Amit R., Belcourt M. HRM processes: A value-creating source of competitive advantage. Eur. Management J. (1999) 17(2):174–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P. Complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(3):216–232Link, Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos C., Lewis M. W. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational amibidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):696–717Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Greve H. R. A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):337–349Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Introduction to the special issue on managing knowledge in organizations: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):v–viiLink, Google Scholar
• Arrow K. The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1962) 29:155–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashby R.An Introduction to Cybernetics (1956) (Chapman and Hall, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autio E., Sapienza H. J., Almeida J. G. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(5):909–924Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin T., Magjuka R. J., Loher B. T. The perils of participation: Effects of choice of training on trainee motivation and learning. Personnel Psych. (1991) 44:51–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkema H. G., Vermeulen F. International expansion though start-up acquisition: A learning perspective. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(1):7–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(1):41–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumol W. J.The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker M. A Framework for applying organization routines in empirical research: Linking antecedents, characteristics and performance outcomes of recurrent interaction patterns. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(5):817–846Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker M., Lazaric N., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(5):775–791Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker M. C. Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change (2004) 13(4):643–677Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker W., Peters J. Technological opportunities, absorptive capacities, and innovation. (2000) . Discussion Paper Series 195, Institute for Economics, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Belderbos R., Carree M., Lokshin B. Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Res. Policy (2004) 33(10):1477–1492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresman H. External learning activities and team performance: A multimethod field study. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(1):81–96Link, Google Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K.Competing from the Edge (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(2):325–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman J. A., Cha S. E. Leading by leveraging culture. California Management Rev. (2003) 45(4):20–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H.Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2003) (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston) Google Scholar
• Cockburn I. M., Henderson R. M. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(2):157–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D. Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):135–139Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. (1989) 99(397):569–596Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Goto A., Nagata A., Nelson R., Walsh J. R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Res. Policy (2002) 31(8–9):1349–1367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins J. C., Porras J. I.Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies (1997) (HarperBusiness, New York) Google Scholar
• Coombs R., Metcalfe J. S., Foss N., Mahnke V. Organizing for innovation: Co-ordinating distributed innovation capabilities. Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 209–231Google Scholar
• Cooper R., Edgett S., Kleinschmidt E. Portfolio management for new products development: Results of an industry practices study. R&D Management (2001) 31(4):361–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costello N.Stability and Change in High-Tech Enterprises—Organisational Practices and Routines (2000) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Daghfous A. Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. SAM Advanced Management J. (2004) 69(2):21–27Google Scholar
• Dosi G., Faillo M., Marengo L. Organizational capabilities, patterns of knowledge accumulation and governance structures in business firms: An introduction. Organ. Stud. (2008) 29(8–9):1165–1185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edquist C.Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations (1997) (Pinter, London) Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epple D., Argote L., Devadas R. Organizational learning curves: A method for investigating intra-plant transfer of knowledge acquired through learning by doing. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):58–70Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–629Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(4):727–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Rafaeli A. Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. J. Management Stud. (2002) 39:309–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss N., Pedersen T. Sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational means of knowledge transfer. J. Internat. Management (2002) 8(1):49–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman C.Technology, Policy, and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan (1987) (Pinter Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
• Freeman C. The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge J. Econom. (1995) 19:5–24Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):113–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C. J., Hackman J. R. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1990) 47:65–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organization capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–387Link, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R.Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback—A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R., Lewin A. Y., Massini S., Seiford L. M., Zhu J. Organizational efficiency as a determinant of learning and selection: Insights from a Pareto efficiency frontier analysis. (2004) . MimeoGoogle Scholar
• Hargadon A. B., Sutton R. I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):716–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(5):339–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill C. W. L., Rothaermel F. T. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):257–274Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsh P. M., Levin D. Z. Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(2):199–212Link, Google Scholar
• Hodgson G. M.Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics (1988) (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resources management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(3):291–313Google Scholar
• Jacoby N. How does the firm manage internal diversity? (2004) The role of internal selection, Presentation, Organisations, Innovation and Complexity: New Perspectives on the Knowledge Economy ConferenceSeptember 9–10(The Complexity Society, Manchester, UK) Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How organizational antecedents matter. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(6):999–1015Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. J., Kohli A. K. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing (1993) 57(July):53–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joglekar P., Bohl A. H., Hamburg M. Comments on “fortune favors the prepared firm”. Management Sci. (1997) 43(10):1455–1468Link, Google Scholar
• Kerr S. (2000) Fireside presentation, Organization Science Winter ConferenceFebruary 12Keystone Lodge, Keystone, COGoogle Scholar
• Kilduff M. Performance and interaction routines in multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1992) 23(1):133–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim D.-J., Kogut B. Technological platforms and diversification. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):283–301Link, Google Scholar
• Knott A. M. The organizational routines factor market paradox. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):929–943Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koch A., Strotmann H. Absorptive capacity and innovation in the knowledge intensive business service sector. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2008) 17(6):511–531Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Kohli A. K., Jaworski B. J., Kumar A. MARKOR: A measure of market orientation. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(4):467–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koza M., Lewin A. Y. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):255–264Link, Google Scholar
• Lane P. J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(5):461–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane P. J., Koka B., Pathak S. The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(4):833–863Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane P. J., Salk J. E., Lyles M. A. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(12):1139–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenox M. J., King A. Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(4):331–345Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenox M. J., Rockart S. R., Lewin A. Y. Firm and industry profits in the presence of interdependent and potentially complementary activities. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):757–772Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., Rerup C. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):502–513Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociology (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Kim J., Poole M. S. The nation-state and culture as influences on organizational change and innovation. Handbook of Organizational Change and Development (2004) Oxford, UK(Oxford University Press)324–353Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Massini S., Tsoukas H., Mylonopoulos N. Knowledge creation and organizational capabilities of innovating and imitating firms. Organizations as Knowledge Systems: Knowledge, Learning and Dynamic Capabilities (2003) (Palgrave/Macmillan, New York) 209–237Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Volberda H. Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):519–534Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Long C. P., Carroll T. N. The co-evolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):535–550Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Massini S., Peeters C. The configuration of internal and external practiced routines of absorptive capacity: A new perspective. (2008) . Working Paper CEB 08-010, Solvay Business School, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Weigelt C. B., Emery J. D., Poole M. S., Van de Ven A. H. Adaptation and selection in strategy and change—Perspectives on strategic change in organizations. Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation (2004) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 108–160Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Massini S., Ruigrok W., Numagami T., Pettigrew A. M., Whittington R., Melin L., Sanchez-Runde C., Van den Bosch F., Ruigrok W., Numagami T. Convergence and divergence of organizing: The moderating effect of nation state. Innovating Forms of Organizing (2003) (Sage, London) 277–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman M., Asaba S. Why do firms imitate each other? Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(2):366–385Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman S. A., Rumelt R. P. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of inter firm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell. J. Econom. (1982) 13:418–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louis M. R., Sutton R. I. Switching cognitive gears: From habits to mind to active thinking. Human Relations (1991) 44(1):55–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lundvall B.-E.National Systems of Innovation (1992) (Pinter, London) Google Scholar
• Malerba F., Orsenigo L. The dynamics and evolution of industries. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5:51–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organization learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G.A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Massini S., Pettigrew A. M., Pettigrew A. M., Whittington R., Melin L., Sanchez-Runde C., Van den Bosch F., Ruigrok W., Numagami T. Complementarities in organisational innovation and performance: Empirical evidence from the INNFORM survey. Innovating Forms of Organizing (2003) (Sage, London) 133–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massini S., Lewin A. Y., Greve H. R. Innovators and imitators: Organizational reference groups and adoption of organizational routines. Res. Policy (2005) 34(10):1550–1569Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massini S., Lewin A. Y., Numagami T., Pettigrew A. M. The evolution of organizational routines among large western and Japanese firms. Res. Policy (2002) 31(8–9):1333–1348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matusik S. F., Heeley M. Absorptive capacity and firm knowledge: Separating the multiple components of the absorptive capacity construct. (2001) Presentation, August 3–8, Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Meyer A. D. Visual data in organizational research. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(2):218–236Link, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–528Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. Complementarities and fit. Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. (1995) 19:179–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minbaeva D., Pedersen T., Bjorkman I., Fey C. F., Park H. J. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2003) 34(6):586–599Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E. Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge J. Econom. (1995) 19(1):67–93Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E., Silverman B. S. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):77–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narduzzo A., Rocco E., Warglien M., Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Talking about routines in the field. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 27–50Google Scholar
• Negassi S. R&D Co-operation and innovation—A microeconometric study on French firms. Res. Policy (2004) 33(3):365–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R.National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study (1993) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3(1):47–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J. Econom. Literature (1995) 33(1):48–90Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• North D. C.Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Knowing in practice: Enhancing a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. (2000) 13(3):249–273Link, Google Scholar
• Palmberg C. The source of innovation—Looking beyond technological opportunities. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2004) 13(2):183–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patel P., Pavitt K. Large firms in the production of the world's technology: An important case of non-globalisation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1991) 22:1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res. Policy (1984) 13(6):343–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K. Innovating routines in the business firm: What corporate tasks should they be accomplishing? Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(1):117–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T. Grammatical models of organizational processes. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(5):541–556Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(5):793–815Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Rueter H. Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):484–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perren L., Grant P. The evolution of management accounting routines in small businesses: A social construction perspective. Management Accounting Res. (2000) 11:391–411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen B., Pedersen T., Lyles M. A. Closing knowledge gaps in foreign markets. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2008) 39:1097–1113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Postrel S., Rumelt R. Incentives routines and self-command. Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1:397–425Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priem R. L., Butler J. E. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26:22–40Google Scholar
• Reason J. T.Human Error (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):824–844Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):274–293Link, Google Scholar
• Rocha F. Inter-firm technological cooperation: Effects of absorptive capacity, firm-size and specialization. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1999) 8(3):253–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N.Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (1978) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Metiu A., George V. P. From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(4):748–772Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotemberg J. J., Saloner G. Visionaries, managers, and strategic direction. RAND J. Econom. (2000) 31(4):693–716Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F. T., Alexandre M. T. Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):759–780Link, Google Scholar
• Rothwell R. Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management (1992) 22(3):221–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakakibara M. Knowledge sharing in cooperative research and development. Managerial Decision Econom. (2003) 24(2/3):117–132Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
• Silverberg G., Dosi G., Orsenigo L. Innovation, diversity and diffusion: A self-organization model. Econom. J. (1988) 98:1032–1054Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior (1947) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A., Smithburg D. W., Thompson V. A.Public Administration (1950) (A. A. Knopf, New York) Google Scholar
• Simonin B. L. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(7):595–623Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song X. M., Montoya-Weiss M. M., Schmidt J. B. Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing and marketing perspectives. J. Product Innovation Management (1997) 14(2):35–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenma H. K., Corley K. G. On the performance of technology-sourcing partnerships: The interaction between partner interdependence and partner attributes. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(6):1045–1067Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock G. N., Greis N. P., Fischer W. A. Absorptive capacity and new product development. J. High Tech. Management Res. (2001) 12(1):77–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton R. I., Hargadon A. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(4):685–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):9–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G., Winter S. Getting it right the second time. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(1):62–69Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G. The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3(3):537–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tether B. S. Who co-operates for innovation, and why—An empirical analysis. Res. Policy (2002) 31(6):947–967Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todorova G., Durisin B. Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(3):774–786Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):464–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22(4):587–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., O'Reilly C.Winning Through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W., de Boer M. Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):551–568Link, Google Scholar
• Veugelers R. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Res. Policy (1997) 26(3):303–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.Generation and Evaluation of Novel Product Concepts via Analysis of Experienced Users (1984) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Lead users: A source of novel products concepts. Management Sci. (1986) 32(7):791–805Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):429–439Link, Google Scholar
• Weber M., Roth G., Wittich C.Economy and Society (1978) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Weiss H. M., Ilgen D. R. Routinized behavior in organizations. J. Behav. Econom. (1985) 14:57–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenpin T. Knowledge transfer in inter-organizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(5):996–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright S., Clark K.Revolutionizing Product Development (1992) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Whitley R. Developing innovative competences: The role of institutional frameworks. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(3):497–528Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. Economic “natural selection” and the theory of the firm. Yale Econom. Essays (1964) 4:225–272Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):991–995Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):185–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–351Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Reuer J. J., Singh H. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(6):701–713Link, Google Scholar