Location, Decentralization, and Knowledge Sources for Innovation

References

• Argyres N. S., Silverman B. S. R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(8–9):929–958Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck N., Katz J. N. The analysis of binary time-series-cross-section data and/or the democratic peace. (1997) Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology GroupColumbus, OHGoogle Scholar
• Cassiman B., Veugelers R. R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(4):1169–1184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chacar A. S., Lieberman M. B., Baum J. A. C., Sorenson O. Organizing for technological innovation in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Geography and Strategy: Advances in Strategic Management (2003) 20(JAI/Elsevier, Oxford, UK) 317–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Chung W., Alcácer J. Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Sci. (2002) 48(12):1534–1554Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Malerba F. Is the tendency to variation the chief cause of progress? Indust. Corporate Change (2001) 10(3):587–608Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlin K. B., Behrens D. M. When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Res. Policy (2005) 34(5):717–737Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabrizio K., Thomas L. G. Tacit demand and innovation in the global pharmaceutical industry. (2007) . Working paper, Emory University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
• Furman J. L. Location and organizing strategy? Exploring the influence of location on organization of pharmaceutical research. Adv. Strategic Management (2003) 20:49–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J. L., Kyle M. K., Cockburn I., Henderson R. M. Public and private spillovers: Location and the productivity of pharmaceutical research. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique (2006) . No. 79/80Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter special issue):109–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1997) 3rd ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature (1990) 28(4):1661–1707Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(Special issue):63–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Cockburn I. Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27(1):32–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kay N., Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., Soete C. The R&D function: Corporate strategy and structure. Technical Change and Economic Theory (1988) (Pinter, London) 283–294Google Scholar
• Keele L., Kelly N. J. Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis (2006) 14(2):186–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B. Country capabilities and the permeability of borders. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(Summer special issue):33–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1993) 24(4):625–646Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuemmerle W. Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries—results from a survey of multinational firms. Res. Policy (1999) 28(2–3):179–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K., Salter A. J. Searching low and high: What type of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Res. Policy (2004) 33(8):1201–1215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K., Salter A. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovative performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(2):131–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A. Competencies, innovation, and profitability of firms. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2000) 9(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A. Skills and innovation. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2005) 23(5–6):303–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A., Helfat C. E. Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management J. (2010) 31(2):224–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Wulf J. Innovation and incentives: Evidence from corporate R&D. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2007) 89(4):634–644Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mairesse J., Mohnen P. Accounting for innovation and measuring innovativeness: An illustrative framework and an application. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(2):226–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mol M. J., Birkenshaw J. The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. J. Bus. Research (2009) 62(12):1269–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Res. Policy (1990) 19(3):193–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patel P. Localized production of technology for global markets. Cambridge J. Econom. (1995) 19(1–4):141–153Google Scholar
• Penner-Hahn J., Shaver J. M. Does international research and development affect patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(2):121–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver J. M. Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. J. Management (2005) 31(3):330–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J. Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Res. Policy (2008) 37(1):77–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Econom. J. (1977) 87(346):242–261Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Indust. Corporate Change (1997) 6(2):341–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• UCLA Academic Technology Services FAQ: How do I interpret a regression model when some variables are log transformed? (2009) . Accessed January 5, 2009, http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/mult_pkg/faq/general/log_transformed_regression.htmGoogle Scholar
• Von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(2):269–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao M., Islam M. Cross-regional ties within firms: Promoting knowledge flow of discouraging knowledge spillovers? (2006) . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar