The Ratings Game: Asymmetry in Classification

References

• Bielby D. D., Bielby W. T. Women and men in film: Gender inequality among writers in a culture industry. Gender Soc. (1996) 10(3):248–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biodrowski S. Hatchet: Interview with writer-director Adam Green. Cine Fantastique (2007) September 6). Accessed May 27, 2008, http://cinefantastiqueonline.com/2007/09/06/hatchet-adam-green/Google Scholar
• Black G. D.Hollywood Censored: Morality Codes, Catholics, and the Movies (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Blank R. M. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the American economic review. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(5):1041–1067Google Scholar
• CARA Questions & answers: Everything you always wanted to know about the movie rating system. (2008) . Accessed May 27, 2008, http://www.filmratings.com/questions.htmGoogle Scholar
• CARA Agreement to submit motion picture for rating. (2009) . Accessed June 29, 2009, http://www.mpaa.org/CARASubmittal-Paperwork8.docGoogle Scholar
• Christofides A. T. Telephone interview. (2009) . January 30, 2009Google Scholar
• Cole S., Cole J. R., Simon G. A. Chance and consensus in peer review. Science (1981) 214(4523):881–886Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dick K.This Film Is Not Yet Rated (2006) (Independent Film Channel, New York) . Movie.Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. Classification in art. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1987) 52(4):440–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doherty T.Pre-Code Hollywood: Sex, Immorality, and Insurrection in American Cinema 1930–1934 (1999) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Doherty T.Hollywood's Censor: Joseph I. Breen and the Production Code Administration (2007) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Emerson R. M. Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1962) 27:31–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ernst M. L., Lorentz P.Censored: The Private Life of the Movies (1930) (Jonathan Cape and Harrison Smith, New York) Google Scholar
• Espeland W. N., Sauder M. Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. (2007) 113(1):1–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farber S.The Movie Ratings Game (1972) (Public Affairs Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Fleischer A. Ambiguity and the equity of rating systems: United States brokerage firms, 1995–2000. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2009) 54(4):555–574Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C., Rouse C. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):715–741Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould R. V. The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. (2002) 107(5):1143–1178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton D. Hollywood's silent partner: A history of the Motion Picture Association of America movie rating system. (1999) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Pólos L., Carroll G. R.Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes and Ecologies (2007) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Howard J. A.Marketing Management (1963) 2nd ed.(Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Hsu G. Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the U.S. film industry. Indust. Corporate Change (2006) 15(3):467–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kids-in-Mind Just like food labeling. (2008) . Accessed May 27, 2008, http://www.kids-in-mind.com/help/about.htmGoogle Scholar
• Leff L. J., Simmons J. L.The Dame in the Kimono: Hollywood, Censorship and the Production Code (2001) 2nd ed.(University of Kentucky Press, Lexington) Google Scholar
• Lemmems T., Freedman B. Ethics for sale? Conflict of interest and commercial research review boards. Milbank Quart. (2000) 78:547–584Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litman B. R. Predicting the success of theatrical movies: An empirical study. J. Popular Culture (1983) 17:159–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Los Angeles Times Film rating system will be challenged. (1971) March 23Google Scholar
• Merton R. K. The Matthew effect in science. Science (1968) 159(3810):56–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michaely R., Womack K. L. Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Rev. Financial Stud. (1999) 12(4):653–686Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy G. L.The Big Book of Concepts (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips D. J., Zuckerman E. W. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107(2):379–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(4):829–872Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puttnam D.Movies and Money (1997) (Vintage Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Ravid S. A., Basuroy S. Managerial objectives, the R-rating puzzle, and the production of violent films. J. Bus. (2004) 77(2, Part 2):S155–S192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L. Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1997) 62(2):218–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E., Rosch E., Lloyd B. B. Principles of categorization. Cognition and Categorization (1978) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 189–206Google Scholar
• Rosch E., Mervis C. B., Gray W. D., Johnson D. M., Boyes-Braem P. Basic object in natural categories. Cognitive Psych. (1976) 8:382–439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholtz J. T. Cooperation, deterrence, and the ecology of regulation enforcement. Law Soc. Rev. (1984) 18(2):179–224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sklar R.Movie-Made America: A Social History of American Movies (1994) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Waguespack D. M. Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2006) 51(4):560–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson K. M., Yokota F. Violence, sex, and profanity in films: Correlation of movie ratings with content. Medscape General Medicine, 6 (2004) . Accessed September 5, 2008, http://www.medscape.comGoogle Scholar
• Ulin R. C.Vintages and Traditions: An Ethnohistory of Southwest French Wine Cooperatives (1996) (Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Valenti J. How it all began. (2009) . Accessed July 29, 2009, http://www.filmratings.com/about/content.htmGoogle Scholar
• Vaughn S.Freedom and Entertainment: Rating the Movies in an Age of New Media (2006) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• West J. M., West D., Dick K. MPAA ratings, black holes, and my film: An interview with Kirby Dick. Cineaste (2006) 32:14Google Scholar
• White H. C. Where do markets come from? Amer. J. Sociol. (1981) 87(3):517–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolf W.Landmark Films: The Cinema and Our Century (1979) (Paddington Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Zajonc R. B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1968) 9(2):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajonc R. B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. Amer. Psychologist (1980) 35(2):151–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zerubavel E.The Fine Line: Making Distinctions in Everyday Life (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E. W. The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104(5):1398–1438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman H., Merton R. K. Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva (1971) 9(1):66–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E. W., Kim T.-Y., Ukanwa K., von Rittmann J. Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. (2003) 108(5):1018–1073Crossref, Google Scholar