Relational Outcomes of Multicommunicating: Integrating Incivility and Social Exchange Perspectives

References

• Andersson L. M., Pearson C. M. Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):452–471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arbuckle J. L., Wothke W.Amos 4.0 User's Guide (1999) (Small-Waters Corporation, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Becerra M., Gupta A. K. Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):32–44Link, Google Scholar
• Bélanger F., Watson-Manheim M. B. Virtual teams and multiple media: Structuring media use to attain strategic goals. Group Decision Negotiation (2006) 15(4):299–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M., Bonett D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. (1980) 88(3):588–606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bies R. J., Greenberg J., Cropanzano R. Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. Advances in Organizational Justice (2001) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 89–118Google Scholar
• Bitner M. J., Booms B. H., Tetreault M. S. The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):71–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau P. M.Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) . [Reprint, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 2004.]Google Scholar
• Blau G., Andersson L. M. Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. (2005) 78(4):595–614Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bluedorn A. C., Kallaith T. J., Strube M. J., Martin G. D. Polychronicity and the inventory of polychronic values. J. Managerial Psych. (1999) 14(3/4):205–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P., Cummings L. L., Bies R., Lewicki R., Sheppard B. Organizations with trust. Research in Negotiations (1995) 5th ed.(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 219–247Google Scholar
• Cameron D. Language: Small incivilities. Critical Quart. (2000) 42(2):127–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron A. F., Webster J. Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant messaging in the workplace. Comput. Human Behav. (2005) 21(1):85–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron A. F., Webster J. But can you catch them? A multi-method exploration of juggling multiple conversations in the workplace. (2007) . Working paper, HEC Montréal, MontréalGoogle Scholar
• Chell E., Symon G., Cassell C. Critical incident technique. Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 51–72Google Scholar
• Clark H. H., Brennan S. E., Resnick L. B., Levine J. M., Teasley S. C. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (1991) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 127–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• CNN.com International E-mails “hurt IQ more than pot”. (2005) . (April 22), http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/04/22/text.iq/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Ed. Psych. Measurement (1960) 20(1):37–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt J. A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(3):386–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Comrey A. L., Lee H. B.A First Course in Factor Analysis (1992) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cook K. S., Rice E., DeLamater J. Social exchange theory. Handbook of Social Psychology (2003) (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York) 53–76Google Scholar
• Cortina L. M. Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2008) 33(1):55–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortina L. M., Magley V. J., Williams J. H., Langhout R. D. Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. J. Occupational Health Psych. (2001) 6(1):64–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa P., McCrae R. R.Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual (1992) (Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL) Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R., Mitchell M. S. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. J. Management (2005) 31(6):874–900Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. B. Anytime/anyplace computing and the future of knowledge work. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(12):67–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Fuller R. M., Valacich J. S. Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(3):575–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Dirks K. T., Ferrin D. L. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):450–467Link, Google Scholar
• Eaton B. D., Newell S., Whitley E. A., Pouloudi N., Wareham J., Mathiassen J. Bitching, bouncing and brawling—How backchannels brought colour to conference calls. Proc. 17th Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems (2009) Verona, Italy:677–688Google Scholar
• Emerson R. M. Social exchange theory. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1976) 2:335–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Estes B., Wang J. Integrative literature review: Workplace incivility: Impacts on individual and organizational performance. Human Resource Dev. Rev. (2008) 7(2):218–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Field A. P.Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2005) 2nd ed.(Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Fleiss J. L.Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (1981) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Garson G. D. Structural equation modeling. Statnotes: Topics in Multivariate Analysis. (2008) . Retrieved October 30, 2008, http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/structur.htmGoogle Scholar
• Goffman E.The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (1959) (Doubleday, Garden City, NY) Google Scholar
• Goffman E.Interaction Rituals (1967) (Doubleday, Garden City, NY) Google Scholar
• Goldberg L. R. The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psych. Assessment (1992) 4(1):26–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden B. R. The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(4):848–860Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouldner A. W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1960) 25(2):161–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haigney D., Westerman S. J. Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: A critical review of research methodology. Ergonomics (2001) 44(2):132–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hall E. T.The Silent Language (1959) (Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, NY) Google Scholar
• Holmes J. G., Rempel J. K., Hendrick C. Trust in close relationships. Close Relationships: Review of Personality and Social Psychology (1989) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 187–220Google Scholar
• Homans G. C. Social behavior as exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. (1958) 63(3):597–606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen K. J. From persistence to pursuit: A longitudinal examination of momentum during the early stages of strategic change. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(3):276–294Link, Google Scholar
• Jett Q. R., George J. M. Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(3):494–507Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson P. R., Indvik J. Slings and arrows of rudeness: Incivility in the workplace. J. Management Dev. (2001) 20(8):705–713Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson-George C., Swap W. C. Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1982) 43(6):1306–1317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones E. E., Harris V. A. The attribution of attitudes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1967) 3(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones G. R., George J. M. The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):531–546Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalkhoff W., Thye S. R. Expectation states theory and research: New observations from meta-analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. (2006) 35(2):219–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanfer R., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of Indust. Organ. Psych. (1990) 12nd ed.(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 75–170Google Scholar
• Katz J. E., Aakhus M. A. Conclusion: Making meaning of mobiles—A theory of Apparatgiest. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 301–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keohane R. O. Reciprocity in international relations. Internat. Organ. (1986) 40(1):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer M. W. Communication and social exchange processes in community theater groups. J. Appl. Comm. Res. (2005) 33(2):159–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler E. J., Thye S. R. Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1999) 25:217–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leary M. R., Springer C., Negel L., Ansell E., Evans K. The causes, phenomenology, and consequences of hurt feelings. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998) 74(5):1225–1237Crossref, Google Scholar
• Licoppe C. Connected presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environ. Planning D (2004) 22(1):135–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim S., Cortina L. M., Magley V. J. Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. (2008) 93(1):95–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind E. A., Greenberg J., Cropanzano R. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. Advances in Organizational. Justice (2001) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 56–88Google Scholar
• Lindell M. K., Whitney D. J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):114–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ling R. S.New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication Is Reshaping Social Cohesion (2008) (MIT Press, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCallum R. C., Browne M. W., Sugawara H. M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psych. Methods (1996) 1(2):130–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(4):502–527Link, Google Scholar
• Maruyama G. M.Basics of Structural Equation Modeling (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAllister D. J. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):24–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):473–490Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meeker B. F. Decisions and exchange. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1971) 36(3):485–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller C. C., Cardinal L. B., Glick W. H. Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(1):189–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molm L. D., Ritzer G., Smart B. Theories of social exchange and exchange networks. Handbook of Social Theory (2000) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 260–272Google Scholar
• Montgomery K., Kane K., Vance C. M. Accounting for differences in norms of respect. Group Organ. Management (2004) 29(2):248–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morello D. The human impact of business IT: How to avoid diminishing returns. (2005) . Gartner Strategic Analysis Report G00125740, Gartner, Stamford, CTGoogle Scholar
• Mutz D. C., Reeves B. The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (2005) 99(1):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nardi B. A., Whittaker S., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Boston) 83–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psych. Bull. (1994) 116(2):220–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearson C. M., Porath C. L. On the nature, consequences and remedies of workplace incivility: No time for “nice”? Think again. Acad. Management Executive (2005) 19(1):7–18Google Scholar
• Pearson C. M., Andersson L. M., Porath C. L. Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organ. Dynam. (2000) 29(2):123–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearson C. M., Andersson L. M., Wegner J. W. When workers flout convention: A study of workplace incivility. Human Relations (2001) 54(11):1387–1419Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penney L. M., Spector P. E. Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. J. Organ. Behav. (2005) 26(7):777–796Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips T., Smith P. Everyday incivility: Towards a benchmark. Sociol. Rev. (2003) 51(1):85–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piccolo R. F., Colquitt J. A. Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(2):327–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porath C. L., Erez A. Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(5):1181–1197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porath C. L., Shapiro D. L., Duffy M. K. When does perceived incivility lead to production deviance? A test of a systemwide perspective. (2004) Presentation, Academy of Management Annual ConferenceAugust 6–11New OrleansGoogle Scholar
• Reinsch N. L., Turner J. W., Tinsley C. H. Multicommunicating: A practice whose time has come? Acad. Management Rev. (2008) 33(2):391–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rennecker J., Godwin L. Delays and interruptions: A self-perpetuating paradox of communication technology use. Inform. Organ. (2005) 15(3):247–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rennecker J., Dennis A. R., Hansen S. Reconstructing the stage: The use of instant messaging to restructure meeting boundaries. Proc. 39th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2006) . Track 1Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers R. D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Experiment. Psych.: General (1995) 124(2):207–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roloff M. E.Interpersonal Communication: The Social Exchange Approach (1981) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Ross L., Berkowitz L. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1977) 10(Academic Press, New York) 173–240Google Scholar
• Rotter J. B. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J. Personality (1967) 35(4):651–665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudy I. A. A critical review of research on electronic mail. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (1996) 4:198–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santosus M. Why more is less: Recent evidence shows that multitasking is an enormous waste of your time and your company's money. CIO (2003) 16(23):1Google Scholar
• Shook C. L., Ketchen D. J., Hult G. T., Kacmar M. An assessment of use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(4):397–404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith D. R., Snell W. E. Goldberg's bipolar measure of the Big-Five personality dimensions: Reliability and validity. Eur. J. Personality (1996) 10(4):283–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M. Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(3):434–459Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D., Karahanna E. Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):160–175Link, Google Scholar
• Stephens K. K., Davis J. The social influences on electronic multitasking in organizational meetings. Management Comm. Quart. (2009) 23(1):63–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Syracuse University The StudyResponse Project: An online social science research resource. (2006) . Retrieved October 31, 2006, http://studyresponse.syr.edu/studyresponse/Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S.Using Multivariate Statistics (2007) 5th ed.(Pearson, Boston) Google Scholar
• Te'eni D. Review: A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):251–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thibaut J. W., Kelley H. H.The Social Psychology of Groups (1959) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Thompson C. Meet the life hackers. New York Times (2005) October 16). http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/16/magazine/16guru.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Turner J. W., Reinsch N. L. “Except when it's my boss”: Intention to communicate polychronically. (2004) . Working paper, Georgetown University, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Turner J. W., Reinsch N. L. The business communicator as presence allocator: Multicommunicating, equivocality, and status at work. J. Bus. Comm. (2007) 44(1):36–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner J. W., Tinsley C. H. Polychronic communication: Managing multiple conversations at once. (2002) Presentation, Academy of Management Annual ConferenceAugust 9–14DenverGoogle Scholar
• Whitener E. M., Brodt S. E., Korsgaard M. A., Werner J. M. Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):513–530Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams A. Mind your Blackberry or mind your manners. New York Times (2009) June 22). http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/22/us/22smartphones.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Woerner S. L., Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. The media toolbox: Combining media in organizational communication. (2004) Presentation, Academy of Management Annual ConferenceAugust 6–11New OrleansGoogle Scholar
• Zweig D., Webster J. Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems. J. Organ. Behav. (2002) 23(5):605–633Crossref, Google Scholar